Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "N2EY" wrote in message Do you support those free upgrades or not? I (K2UNK) do...on this "one time" basis. Uh huh! I'll ask: Are those who get the so called "one time" upgrade qualified? Why would they be "unqualified?" Let's be serious here! In the incentive license scheme the privileges gained have no bearing at all to the knowledge base in the sylabus for the license test. I'd strongly suggest the greater danger to personal or others life/limb is equally shared by Tech thru Extra as it relates to permitted VHF/UHF operating at the legal limit. If you support them, then by definition you are supoorting a reduction in the written test requirements for those licenses. Incomplete statement. Supporting a one-time upgrade doesn't mean anyone supports "permanent" reductions of the written requirements. THAT is the critical difference. Give me a break, Bill! Are the people getting the "one time upgrade" qualified? Tell me why they would be unqualified? Unqualified as to doing what? Now you might argue that it's only a temporary or one-time reduction, but it's still a reduction. It is a ONE time reduction. You and I can disagree about the reason's to do it, but my support or anyone else's support of the one time upgrade does NOT mean I or anyone else supports permanent reductions in requirements. Are the people qualified? YES...and if you think otherwise, please tell us what makes them unqualified and/or in what specific aspect(s) or priviliges they would be unqualified. And since it affects over 400,000 hams, it's not a small matter. If it goes through it will be forgotten in a couple of years. Why, because no one losses any privileges. Are they qualified? Broken record here it seems. A few things here. IF the people getting the free upgrade are qualified then there is *no reason to increase the requirements ever again*. If you support that you are just as supportive of a hazing requirement (over-testing) as the evil Morse code supporters. I repeat agin, the incentive licensing system bears NO true relation to the increased privileges granted. The incentive system as created simply asks for passage of another test on subject matter of a more difficult content. Knowledge of that material certainly doesn't lead to any special qualification that differentiates an Extra operating in the "Extra Only" spectrum from that of a General operating in the General spectrum of the same band at the same maximum permitted power. If they are not qualified, then you are not only sending them upward and onward without the proper qualifications, you are doing them a great disservice. Quite frankly, I believe that You, Carl, and Mr. W5YI do *indeed* support permanent changes in the written requirement access to HF. The ARRL does not take that position at all...except for the "new" novice which would have greater HF privileges...but with limited power. Carl and I support the ARRL petition (except for the code test) I refuse to believe that you are all that naive to think that we'll just do this once Believe whatever makes you feel good. and no one will notice that suddenly the requirements will go up. The requirements won't go up...they will stay the same. The only thing happening here (if FCC approves) is the written test will be waiver one time for the particular ham going from Tech to General or Advanced to Extra. I remember promises of never accepting reduction in test requirements. I remember the explicit distancing of personal opinions from NCI. But here you all are, supporting reductions in the requirements for access to HF. A pattern forms. Yea, yea...and with the music to twilight Zone in the background too. Believe whatever you want, whatever floats your boat. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "N2EY" wrote in message Do you support those free upgrades or not? I (K2UNK) do...on this "one time" basis. Uh huh! I'll ask: Are those who get the so called "one time" upgrade qualified? Why would they be "unqualified?" Let's be specific: It is because they will not have passed the exam which the FCC says they must pass in order to qualify for a specific class of license. Let's be serious here! It is getting tougher to be serious when you persist in yanking our lanyards. In the incentive license scheme the privileges gained have no bearing at all to the knowledge base in the sylabus for the license test. Let's do this one in your manner: Whatever floats your boat. Life's a--well, you know the drill. I'd strongly suggest the greater danger to personal or others life/limb is equally shared by Tech thru Extra as it relates to permitted VHF/UHF operating at the legal limit. How many beginners do you know who run the legal limit on VHF/UHF. I'm betting that the answer is "none". If you support them, then by definition you are supoorting a reduction in the written test requirements for those licenses. Incomplete statement. Supporting a one-time upgrade doesn't mean anyone supports "permanent" reductions of the written requirements. THAT is the critical difference. Give me a break, Bill! Are the people getting the "one time upgrade" qualified? Tell me why they would be unqualified? Unqualified as to doing what? They will not have met the qualifications for holding the higher class license. No ifs, ands or buts. Now you might argue that it's only a temporary or one-time reduction, but it's still a reduction. It is a ONE time reduction. You and I can disagree about the reason's to do it, but my support or anyone else's support of the one time upgrade does NOT mean I or anyone else supports permanent reductions in requirements. Are the people qualified? YES...and if you think otherwise, please tell us what makes them unqualified and/or in what specific aspect(s) or priviliges they would be unqualified. By your statement, you are supporting a watering down of both the General and Extra class licenses. I'm quite certain that this is something you stated that you'd never support. And since it affects over 400,000 hams, it's not a small matter. If it goes through it will be forgotten in a couple of years. Why, because no one losses any privileges. Are they qualified? Broken record here it seems. The question keeps coming up because straight answers have not been forthcoming. A few things here. IF the people getting the free upgrade are qualified then there is *no reason to increase the requirements ever again*. If you support that you are just as supportive of a hazing requirement (over-testing) as the evil Morse code supporters. I repeat agin, the incentive licensing system bears NO true relation to the increased privileges granted. The incentive system as created simply asks for passage of another test on subject matter of a more difficult content. Knowledge of that material certainly doesn't lead to any special qualification that differentiates an Extra operating in the "Extra Only" spectrum from that of a General operating in the General spectrum of the same band at the same maximum permitted power. So you do stand in support of reduced testing requirements and of the elimination of incentive licensing. There can be no other explanation. If your agenda extends not just to the elimination of morse testing but to the watering down of the written exams, why not be bold? Come out and say so. If they are not qualified, then you are not only sending them upward and onward without the proper qualifications, you are doing them a great disservice. Quite frankly, I believe that You, Carl, and Mr. W5YI do *indeed* support permanent changes in the written requirement access to HF. The ARRL does not take that position at all...except for the "new" novice which would have greater HF privileges...but with limited power. Carl and I support the ARRL petition (except for the code test) The League's position provides a "gimme" to tens of thousands by granting a by on testing. It is apparent that if it can be done on a one-time basis, it can be done permanently. I refuse to believe that you are all that naive to think that we'll just do this once Believe whatever makes you feel good. Is that how you decide what to believe? and no one will notice that suddenly the requirements will go up. The requirements won't go up...they will stay the same. The only thing happening here (if FCC approves) is the written test will be waiver one time for the particular ham going from Tech to General or Advanced to Extra. You mean, those hams who will not have passed the exam to go from Tech to General or Advanced to Extra. You mean a "gimme" for tens of thousands. Tell us again the motivation for such a thing. What makes it necessary to do. I remember promises of never accepting reduction in test requirements. I remember the explicit distancing of personal opinions from NCI. But here you all are, supporting reductions in the requirements for access to HF. A pattern forms. Yea, yea...and with the music to twilight Zone in the background too. I didn't hear music. I did read your words and Carl's words. What you are writing these days is at odds with the earlier statements. Your earlier statements which traditionally began, "all we want is..." sound disingenuous. Believe whatever you want, whatever floats your boat. Opposition to the League's plan floats mine right now. I suppose your comment is better than one of Lennie's "TS" brushoffs. Dave K8MN |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Heil" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "N2EY" wrote in message Do you support those free upgrades or not? I (K2UNK) do...on this "one time" basis. Uh huh! I'll ask: Are those who get the so called "one time" upgrade qualified? Why would they be "unqualified?" Let's be specific: It is because they will not have passed the exam which the FCC says they must pass in order to qualify for a specific class of license. Which, as anyone familiar with incentive licensing, has NOTHING to do with actually being qualified to do anything specific to amateur radio based on the additional privileges. Let's be serious here! It is getting tougher to be serious when you persist in yanking our lanyards. Me? I just support the ARRL petition....I didn't propose it. Seems you don't like anyone giving an opinion contrary to yours. If you don't agree with me, I really don't give a damn...as the ONLY arbiter of the outcome that matters is what the FCC will think and do. In the incentive license scheme the privileges gained have no bearing at all to the knowledge base in the sylabus for the license test. Let's do this one in your manner: Whatever floats your boat. Life's a--well, you know the drill. Glad to see you have nothing credible to refute my statement. I'd strongly suggest the greater danger to personal or others life/limb is equally shared by Tech thru Extra as it relates to permitted VHF/UHF operating at the legal limit. How many beginners do you know who run the legal limit on VHF/UHF. I'm betting that the answer is "none". Doesn't matter. They can if they want. Also, what makes you assume ALL technicians are beginners? If you support them, then by definition you are supoorting a reduction in the written test requirements for those licenses. Incomplete statement. Supporting a one-time upgrade doesn't mean anyone supports "permanent" reductions of the written requirements. THAT is the critical difference. Give me a break, Bill! Are the people getting the "one time upgrade" qualified? Tell me why they would be unqualified? Unqualified as to doing what? They will not have met the qualifications for holding the higher class license. No ifs, ands or buts. Yet you can't offer one operating skill or privilege that would be covered by such lack of having passed the requisit test. Now you might argue that it's only a temporary or one-time reduction, but it's still a reduction. It is a ONE time reduction. You and I can disagree about the reason's to do it, but my support or anyone else's support of the one time upgrade does NOT mean I or anyone else supports permanent reductions in requirements. Are the people qualified? YES...and if you think otherwise, please tell us what makes them unqualified and/or in what specific aspect(s) or priviliges they would be unqualified. By your statement, you are supporting a watering down of both the General and Extra class licenses. I'm quite certain that this is something you stated that you'd never support. If you want it clearer...I support the ARRL petition. In doing so, I acknowledge that there will be, if implemented as submitted, a ONE_TIME reduction of test requirements for those hams that get free upgrades. I also recognize and understand that other than the one-time upgrades, there will be NO reduction in written test requirements for Extra and General. Clear enough for you? And since it affects over 400,000 hams, it's not a small matter. If it goes through it will be forgotten in a couple of years. Why, because no one losses any privileges. Are they qualified? Broken record here it seems. The question keeps coming up because straight answers have not been forthcoming. The question keeps coming up because some people can't understand the difference between a ONE-TIME waiver as opposed to a PERMANENT change in requirements. A few things here. IF the people getting the free upgrade are qualified then there is *no reason to increase the requirements ever again*. If you support that you are just as supportive of a hazing requirement (over-testing) as the evil Morse code supporters. I repeat agin, the incentive licensing system bears NO true relation to the increased privileges granted. The incentive system as created simply asks for passage of another test on subject matter of a more difficult content. Knowledge of that material certainly doesn't lead to any special qualification that differentiates an Extra operating in the "Extra Only" spectrum from that of a General operating in the General spectrum of the same band at the same maximum permitted power. So you do stand in support of reduced testing requirements and of the elimination of incentive licensing. I do NOT support a permanant reduction of written requirements. I support a limited incentive system but I wish the additional privileges bore some relationship to the additional knowledge being tested for. There can be no other explanation. I just gave you one above. The fact that I recognize the reality of privileges vs knowledge being virtually non-existent, and that I am willing to state the obvious, does not mean I must, therefore, oppose incentive licensing. If your agenda extends not just to the elimination of morse testing but to the watering down of the written exams, why not be bold? Come out and say so. Because it isn't true! If they are not qualified, then you are not only sending them upward and onward without the proper qualifications, you are doing them a great disservice. Quite frankly, I believe that You, Carl, and Mr. W5YI do *indeed* support permanent changes in the written requirement access to HF. The ARRL does not take that position at all...except for the "new" novice which would have greater HF privileges...but with limited power. Carl and I support the ARRL petition (except for the code test) The League's position provides a "gimme" to tens of thousands by granting a by on testing. It is apparent that if it can be done on a one-time basis, it can be done permanently. Is that what ARRL is proposing? Is that what I have stated I support? Answer - NO! I refuse to believe that you are all that naive to think that we'll just do this once Believe whatever makes you feel good. Is that how you decide what to believe? Depends on the decision to be made and the circumstances. and no one will notice that suddenly the requirements will go up. The requirements won't go up...they will stay the same. The only thing happening here (if FCC approves) is the written test will be waiver one time for the particular ham going from Tech to General or Advanced to Extra. You mean, those hams who will not have passed the exam to go from Tech to General or Advanced to Extra. You mean a "gimme" for tens of thousands. Tell us again the motivation for such a thing. What makes it necessary to do. Read the ARRL petition. ARRL makes the case and I agree with their logic. No need to repeat it again. I remember promises of never accepting reduction in test requirements. I remember the explicit distancing of personal opinions from NCI. But here you all are, supporting reductions in the requirements for access to HF. A pattern forms. Yea, yea...and with the music to twilight Zone in the background too. I didn't hear music. I did read your words and Carl's words. What you are writing these days is at odds with the earlier statements. Your earlier statements which traditionally began, "all we want is..." sound disingenuous. What is at odds with you is that you don't understand the difference between ONE-TIME and PERMANENT change. If it makes you happy to think that supporting a one-time waiver makes Carl and I supports of reducing requiremnts, then you are free to enjoy your own beliefs. Believe whatever you want, whatever floats your boat. Opposition to the League's plan floats mine right now. I suppose your comment is better than one of Lennie's "TS" brushoffs. Frankly Dave, I don't give a damn. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Do you really believe for a second that if the upgrades take place that there will suddenly be 300K people "on-the-air" in HF that haven't been? If yes, I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. Reality check... 1. How many Techs now own an HF rig at all? 2. How many, if upgraded will buy an HF rig? 3. How many Techs are spouses or family members of an existing ham who is already General, Advanced or Extra? 4. How many of existing 300K techs are SK or otherwise inactive anyway? As for "elmering" those that would become Generals, I'm sure many of us are willing to help anyone that asks for help. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Bill Sohl wrote:
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message link.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Do you really believe for a second that if the upgrades take place that there will suddenly be 300K people "on-the-air" in HF that haven't been? If yes, I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. Reality check... 1. How many Techs now own an HF rig at all? 2. How many, if upgraded will buy an HF rig? 3. How many Techs are spouses or family members of an existing ham who is already General, Advanced or Extra? 4. How many of existing 300K techs are SK or otherwise inactive anyway? As for "elmering" those that would become Generals, I'm sure many of us are willing to help anyone that asks for help. Of course! One thing I can't stand is the p**sy attitude of some OF's toward newcomers. I'll be happy to Elmer these folk. I'll probably point them toward one of the General Study guides, or even the old General Question pool for one thing. Operation of a station will be another thing, and hopefully we can get them off to a good start. IMO they would be at some handicap at the beginning. - Mike KB3EIA - |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Bill Sohl wrote: "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message link.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Do you really believe for a second that if the upgrades take place that there will suddenly be 300K people "on-the-air" in HF that haven't been? If yes, I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. Reality check... 1. How many Techs now own an HF rig at all? 2. How many, if upgraded will buy an HF rig? 3. How many Techs are spouses or family members of an existing ham who is already General, Advanced or Extra? 4. How many of existing 300K techs are SK or otherwise inactive anyway? As for "elmering" those that would become Generals, I'm sure many of us are willing to help anyone that asks for help. Of course! One thing I can't stand is the p**sy attitude of some OF's toward newcomers. I'll be happy to Elmer these folk. I'll probably point them toward one of the General Study guides, or even the old General Question pool for one thing. Operation of a station will be another thing, and hopefully we can get them off to a good start. IMO they would be at some handicap at the beginning. I think there are plenty of folks that have worked DX on VHF and will fit right in. Those that venture into HF that have only repeater experience will, as you note, probably need some helpful direction. I'm with you as to being ready and willing to help anyone. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
"Bill Sohl" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Do you really believe for a second that if the upgrades take place that there will suddenly be 300K people "on-the-air" in HF that haven't been? If yes, I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. Reality check... 1. How many Techs now own an HF rig at all? 2. How many, if upgraded will buy an HF rig? 3. How many Techs are spouses or family members of an existing ham who is already General, Advanced or Extra? 4. How many of existing 300K techs are SK or otherwise inactive anyway? As for "elmering" those that would become Generals, I'm sure many of us are willing to help anyone that asks for help. Cheers, Bill K2UNK It was partially a hypothetical question. Some Techs are inactive anyway so there's probably a signficant portion there. However if even just a third of them get on the air, that's still a big enough increase, even if spread over months, since some will be buying rigs, that it could be a problem for a while. If even 10% of the current Techs get on the HF bands within a relatively short period of time, it will be chaotic for a period of time. But answer this. If they are not going to get on the air, what is the point of the free upgrade??? It is senseless to give people something they are not going to use. Let's take a look at the points 1 to 3. 1. Most Techs that I personally know have an HF+2m rig at home as they are planning to upgrade anyway. Or they have it for all-mode VHF/UHF capability or satellite work. All these people will be in a position to go on the air instantly if free upgrades are instituted. 2. Among the active Techs, a very high percentage can be expected to buy an HF rig as soon as they could afford one. 3. If they are a family member of a higher class licensee and are actually interested in radio for its own sake, they will go on the air immediately. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message ink.net... "Dee D. Flint" wrote in message .com... "Bill Sohl" wrote in message nk.net... Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Do you really believe for a second that if the upgrades take place that there will suddenly be 300K people "on-the-air" in HF that haven't been? If yes, I have a nice bridge in Brooklyn I'd like to sell you. Reality check... 1. How many Techs now own an HF rig at all? 2. How many, if upgraded will buy an HF rig? 3. How many Techs are spouses or family members of an existing ham who is already General, Advanced or Extra? 4. How many of existing 300K techs are SK or otherwise inactive anyway? As for "elmering" those that would become Generals, I'm sure many of us are willing to help anyone that asks for help. Cheers, Bill K2UNK It was partially a hypothetical question. Some Techs are inactive anyway so there's probably a signficant portion there. However if even just a third of them get on the air, that's still a big enough increase, even if spread over months, since some will be buying rigs, that it could be a problem for a while. If even 10% of the current Techs get on the HF bands within a relatively short period of time, it will be chaotic for a period of time. But answer this. If they are not going to get on the air, what is the point of the free upgrade??? It is senseless to give people something they are not going to use. I can turn that around in a heart-beat. If they are not going to get on the air on HF, why would YOU care? Bottom line, none of us know how many will "get into" HF and how many won't. Let's take a look at the points 1 to 3. 1. Most Techs that I personally know have an HF+2m rig at home as they are planning to upgrade anyway. Or they have it for all-mode VHF/UHF capability or satellite work. All these people will be in a position to go on the air instantly if free upgrades are instituted. Do they have an antenna for HF transmitting too? 2. Among the active Techs, a very high percentage can be expected to buy an HF rig as soon as they could afford one. And you base that on what logic or facts? 3. If they are a family member of a higher class licensee and are actually interested in radio for its own sake, they will go on the air immediately. Fine, but they can't be on the same time as their other family member with the HF license. Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In article , "Dee D. Flint"
writes: Supposing that the ARRL petition is the form in which the change actually gets made and that all the newly upgraded people get on HF, how is the ham community supposed to "elmer" 300,000+ new HF users all at once? Put it all on a W1AW bulletin. Will take less than 15 minutes to describe at 20 WPM in a broadcast. :-) LHA / WMD |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|