Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dan/W4NTI wrote:
I operated on 7.010 and received a notice of violation from the Cleveland Ohio FCC monitor. I was out of band for my class of license. Was there a fine or some other penalty involved? Or did they understand that it was an oversight and told them you won't do that again? I once did a similar mistake (I was in band for my license but was a wrong mode, i.e., SSB in the CW/data segment answering some DX on 40) but soon spotted it and stopped doing it. Haven't heard anything from the FCC, I think they know people occasionally make such mistakes. But if someone keeps doing it then watch out. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Robert Casey" wrote in message ... Dan/W4NTI wrote: I operated on 7.010 and received a notice of violation from the Cleveland Ohio FCC monitor. I was out of band for my class of license. Was there a fine or some other penalty involved? Or did they understand that it was an oversight and told them you won't do that again? I once did a similar mistake (I was in band for my license but was a wrong mode, i.e., SSB in the CW/data segment answering some DX on 40) but soon spotted it and stopped doing it. Haven't heard anything from the FCC, I think they know people occasionally make such mistakes. But if someone keeps doing it then watch out. Since you asked....I called the office in Cleveland that issued the notice. During the conversation I was asked 'where have you been not to know of this change?', or something to that effect. My response was that I had just got back from Nam and wanted to play radio again. The notice was thrown out, no fines or warnings other than to use a higher crystal..hi. Dan/W4NTI |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1412  September 3, 2004 | Dx | |||
Excellent ARRL proposal | General |