| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#19
August 26th 04, 09:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: ARRL to propose subband-by-bandwidth regulation
From: (Brian) Date: 8/25/2004 3:10 PM Central Standard Time Message-id: (N2EY) wrote in message ... But for me the important question is: Should there be CW-only subbands? I say yes - about the lowest 15-20% of each HF/MF hamband. Including 160. Why not? Would it really bother anyone if 3500-3575 and 7000-7050 were CW only? Only if it were to include all other "digital" (hi,hi) modes... As it is, CW is allowed in ALL MF/HF -amateur- spectrum. As it is, Brian, do you understand WHY it's allowed? 73 Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| ARRL Propose New License Class & Code-Free HF Access | Antenna | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | General | |||
| ARRL Walks Away From Bandwidth Restrictions | Dx | |||
Threaded Mode
