| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
Dave Heil wrote: N9OGL wrote: 1. The Electromagnetic Spectrum belongs to the people and the people should have a right to Uses the Spectrum. They do. And under our Constitution and laws, the FCC ensures, to the best of it's ability, that this FINITE RESOURCE will be accessible to all. Of course electronic anarchists like N9OGL who believe that anyone should do anything they like would make it impossible for anyone to use it at all. 2. The FCC should only be allowed to license that, which is under 47 USC 151 "Interstate and Foreign Commerce by wire or radio" OK. Let's remove the FCC from the picture for a second. You go ahead and fire up your LPFM station on 107.9 (or whatever frequency you choose). I live next town over and I want to operate on 107.9...Or worse yet, I just want to jam you becasue I think your "opinion" or programming format suck. Who ya gonna call now? State or local agencies? OK...So Illinois allows you to operate here...but just across the state line in Podunk, Missouri, THEY "license" me to operate on that frequency...at 1500 watts, because in MO they define "low power" as anything below 10,000 watts. I'd usually expect a rational person to see where this is going, but hey...it's Todd... 3. Not only should a person have the right to listen to not only the broadcast services but all parts of the electromagnetic spectrum. even the cellular band which is part of the radio spectrum and there by belong to the people. Hey Todd...waddaya say I park a van outside your place and start monitoring your cell and cordless phones. I further record them and play them at local venues. Since everyone can listen to everything under your "plan", nothing you say on "the phone" is protected. 4. The people should have the right to choice his satellite package. The person should have the right if he wants the Network feeds off the satellite and wants to pay for them be allowed to buy them regardless if he recieve local broadcasting. Gee, Todd...We have that here in Tennessee...What's up with you in Ill-annoyed? 5. The FCC should eliminate any useless services on the electromagnetic spectrum (There is still some first generation radio services on the air) Any new service like Digital Cellular Phones should be phased into the old cell band instead of allocating them spectrum. You are incompetent to hold broadcast licensure, and only hold Amateur licensure by the grace of God...Why would they consider your "ideas" for wireless telephone technology? 6. The FCC should make it easier for people to obtain a license, they should promote the Idea of waivering fees and other stuff like Techincal rules. The FCC should accept applications regardless if it's a filing window or not. Oh, heck yeah! Let's let anyone who get's it in thier head to do so to have a license! And since we're loading the bands up with all these citizen-broadcasters, let's screw the technical standards which help to maximize the already dwindling spectrum! What's a little intermod or bleed-over among broadcasters! Live out on the fringes of overlapping stations? Too bad! 7. The FCC shouldn't create quick fixs policies instead should try to improve what they have internally. Does anyone other than Todd have an idea what this means? Todd-to-English translation, please...??? 8. The FCC should stop believing in this "burden on the commission" because there is always going to be a burden regardless. instead the FCC should try to get things done. But Todd! You'd just throw them aside! Besides, Todd...And I know this will be painful for you to accept, but it's ill-informed, narrowminided, functioanlly illiterate IDIOTS like you that create the burden in the first place! 9. The FCC should work more closer to the people then the big companies and organizations. The FCC believes they serve the public's intrest but in reality the FAA serves the public's intrest better then the FCC because the FAA listens to the people. And what was the last NPRM from the FAA YOU responded to, Todd? What "issues" has the FAA addressed that the FCC has failed to do so, Toddie? 10. The Question of what's Interstate and what's Interstate should be answered. BBBWWWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA ! ! ! ! !! well that's it.....that's the changes I think are needed I believe the FCC could care less on what I say or anyone in alt.radio.pirate. then again I like everyone else bitching and voicing my opinion I enjoy seeing you act this way in public too, Todd...It reaffirms my belief that procreation should be licensed, and abortions should be permitted up to age 30. Sure there has been a few cases with interferning with the aircraft band as a pilot myself I wouldn't want that to happen. However there has been a lot of low power services out there that didn't cause interfernce which out weights the cases that do. And which case that DOES cause interference to the avaition allocations is OK, Todd? How many episodes of interference are OK to the safety of flight? Do YOU want to be on the flight that winds up two miles short of the runway because some idiot LIKE YOU was exercising his "free speech" on an ILS frequency? Do you want to be the guy who kept an FAA facility from hearing a distress call or warning of a hijacking just so you could transmit your "bulletins" on "pirate TV"...?!?! That's EXACTLY what you're proposing with your anarchist licensing ideas or relaxation of "technical rules"... I am against thre LOW POWER RADIO PETITION because to me it is a quick fixs the FCC should allow that service now with waivers (which their rules allow) but they will not. I did apply for a license twice and both times it was returned so my view is to HELL with them. I am sure your whole life has been full of people realizing what an idiot you are and did their best to keep you from making a fool out of yourself or harming others with your "me first" attitudes. We can only hope the FCC will keep it up. (I am kinda hoping K2ASP might "drop a dime" on some old friends in Gettysburg to start the mill moving on Toddie now!) Oh one more thing this "chaos" which accured back in the 20's wasn't by Low power operators but by greedy Commercial operators and the Navy. Sure it was by "low power" operators! There were "broadcast stations" popping up on every hotel and newspaper building across the country! Right, but there is a lot of broadcast services that don't cross the line. for example my 8 watt Low power television transmitter which runs on UHF will not cross the state line because 1. i'm in the middle of the state. 2. the power of 8 watts and the antenna height of 60 ft 3. the terrain. fact is my station doesnot cross the state line and there by the FCC doesn't have the juridiction over my signal. So...it's OK if you're "in the middle of the state"...But what about folks who live close to state lines? Or people who live at higher elevations and even low power carries far? Or how about folks who live in realtively small states ie: Rhode Island, Delaware, etc? They're just squat out of luck? Face it, Todd...Not everyone can be or even SHOULD be a "broadcaster". L E A S T of all a racist, incompetent, functionally illiterate idiot like you! But there is an "up" side...You do have a future as a stand up comic...You've had us in stitches for days! Steve, K4YZ |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| The Death of Amateur Radio | Policy | |||
| FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
| a great read | CB | |||
| Response to "21st Century" Part Two (Communicator License) | Policy | |||