bb wrote:
K4YZ wrote:
K4YZ wrote:

Now...About this assertion of yours that ARES won't respond
and
is
"overblown"...?!?!

"Won't respond???"

You'll have to Google up that one.

You've insisted that ARES is overblown and won't/can't respond to
any major disaster.

Still waiting for an answer to that one, Brian...

Why? You've answered it yourself with your own inability to write a
duty schedule with available qualified radio amateur volunteers that
will meet the requirements laid out by the exercise planners.

And you CONTINUE TO LIE by insisting otherwise, Brain. It was
done. You're story blown. Too bad for you.

Too bad for you, too bad for ARES, and too bad for Amateur Radio.

Too bad for YOU that your assertions were proven FALSE WEEKS ago.

Next?

Next? Next we'll expect you to ante up answers to all the
questions still awaiting answers, Brian.

Steve, K4YZ