Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
"an_old_friend" wrote in message oups.com... K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: First none wonders why you consider me an idiot You finally got one thing right this week... Mighty white of you old man K4YZ wrote: an_old_friend wrote: KØHB wrote: "an_old_friend" wrote I'd guess for your answer that Morse encoded Cw isn't allowed but you I guess answering a question si too much for you Hey Dump Huck, I did answer your question, and I did so quite precisely. As a licensed amateur, what part of "2K8J3E" don't you understand? All of it. tht sort of usage is not in vogue, nor is it in english. "...not in vogue..." all true Yes, it's true that you don't understand emission designators...Yet it's supposed to be a part of your licensing scope. not a question about alph numeric mode codes in my question pool The only even mention was mode A1A Morse encoded CW, and that was only as an aside in Gordon book that I used to prepare for it and No suchare even mention in the current Tech pool If you think it should you shouldaddress your coments to the NVEC crying cut for formating improvements You cut yourself out? Why? nop cut out your crying And get this...MARK MORGAN talking about what is or is not "english"..... indeed and you have a problem with that, and need to start another of your personal attack threads It's not a personal attack, Mark. It's a professional observation. Nope a BIG lie for an ER nurse, not your feild You have a problem with English. You're not very proficient at it. but your coment that I am more proficent in Sebian is a lie crying cut for formating improvements Snipped more embarrassing stuff, you mean... Nope just one of your crying 73, de Hans, K0HB 73's on an couple of snide posts is about what you'd expect And you're one of the singularly most idiotic and narrow brained idiots to ever be allowed to get on the Internet or hold an Amateur Radio license! which even if true (and franky you have a real sample problem) has nothing to do with the statement No...not "...even if true..." yes even if true You are the close to most narrowminded idoit haolding a Ham license. Yo Doc was the worst I know of It's absolutely true. nope "Snide"...?!?!?! What an IDIOT! thinking somebody snide makes one an idiot No...YOU calling Hans "snide" for having the temerity to actually think he was doing you a favor by answering your question for you in an accurate and prompt manner makes you an idiot. Well he amswered some OTHER question not mine and not one tht had been asked well then Hoist you idiot Huh...?!?! "Hoist you"...?!?! yes aren't well enough educated Some gay pagan salute? Nope and more of your gaybashing more of your pagan bashing Steve, K4YZ I hate to see this thread continue; perhaps I can shed some light on it. "2K8J3E" is broken down into two parts. 2K8 and J3E. Years ago, A1 was CW. F3 was FM. A3 was AM. Well, they clarified the emission types to indicate whether a signal was single sideband, double sideband, independent sidebands and whether the carrier was suppressed, reduced, or full carrier. J3E refers to the emission type. I have a strong suspicion that 2K8 represents a 2.8 kilohertz bandwidth. We often refer to single sideband, fm, cw, or whatever. The nomenclature that Steve put forth is a formal one that pins down the emission type and bandwidth much more clearly than saying something like "FM". FM, as you might be aware, comes in a number of flavors. Narrowband FM has become even narrower in recent years; however, commercial broadcasting FM is much wider (and often has a subcarrier present too. They have stereo as well as secondary transmissions (perhaps Muzak) as well). So Steve may have been a little strong in his wording, but his conclusion was not in error. You appear to have little knowledge of emission types/bandwidth occupancy. Not slamming you, but Steve was not entirely remiss in his post. 73 from Rochester, NY Jim AA2QA |