Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#26
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Dave Heil wrote: wrote: From: an_old_friend on Sep 17, 8:38 am Michael Coslo wrote: an_old_friend wrote: Dan/W4NTI wrote: Coslo wants a cozy little chatroom with all in general agreement with him. As he's written before, he wants to be entertained. When he can't come up with valid replies on the SUBJECT, he resorts to personal insults such as "ham hating." Tsk, tsk. Is that how you end up resorting to the personal insults here? You can't come up with a valid reply on "the subject" (the subject being defined as anything you want to discuss)? no Coslo falls into too much self-identification of himself as "ham radio." Be opposed to Coslo's opinion and (in his view) one is "hating ham radio." The same with Jeswald, Heil, and Miccolis. Too much self-identification of himself as "ham radio"? How much is too much? much of any is too much Mike may think of himself as a part of ham radio. He is a radio amateur. The same is true of all other radio amateurs who post here. You don't fall into that category. You're not involved. again with the credentcails game Dave? what is the obsessioons with credentcails? Youd think a ham licesen was the equal of a PHD as much as you make of it, instead of being more like a college admission All my exchanges with him have become drearily predictable and not very interesting, at least to me. I don't need the non-sequitars, the name calling, or the constant attempts to steer most every thread to CW testing. realy I don't see that. Len does certainly get rather verbose, sometimes to point of undermining his his point but that is also the hallamrk Jim, N2EY Consider what I write in here as a "first draft." It isn't polished to someone's perfection but then I'm NOT getting paid anything to post. It isn't worth my time to sit and rewrite to publishing standards, not to my wallet, not to my ego. It is, in effect, flow-of-consciousness CONVERSATION with unseen beings somehwere in netland. :-) So "drearily predictable", "not very interesting", the name calling and constant attempts to steer every topic toward morse code testing is the result of your not being paid? result no, his wordyness is, as he said but then you can't read it unless perhaps he sent it in morse ode the real reason is more in line with the exercise of Freedom and Free will 2 things you don't think highly of Mr. Anderson simply hates Hams. That is okay, no one has to like Hams, me, or chunk light tuna. No Len doesn't hate hams, he does hate that fairly visible segment of the ham world that is very inflexible and frankly are dishonest to themselves, and then to the rest of us I don't hate hams and I rather like tuna/albacore, but only if packed in water, not oil. :-) Coslo got ****ed off again and used an old, old computer-modem ploy of winning message points by repeating untruths of his opponents...instead of concentrating on the SUBJECT under discussion. That ploy is sometimes effective to "win friends" (to his viewpoint) but is just egregious. It is well-known to those of us having done computer-modem communications a long time. But, Len, Mike hasn't repeated untruths about you. You belittle Morse Code ops. You belittle the efforts of radio amateur volunteers who rushed to the aid of those in need in the wake of Hurricane Katrina. You belittle DXers. You belittle contesters. You berate the ARRL at every opportunity. You often rant of your "PROFESSIONAL" (by now mostly past professional) status in electronics. You repeat and repeat and repeat what, to you, must be military glories. but he has related unturths, the biggest of them is that the fellows you just rattled off are the totality of Ham radio A rational being might easily assume that you dislike amateur radio and amateur radio operators. only an operator that think too highly of his personal interests in the Ham radio It's okay for Coslo to say I "hate ham radio." Or Jeswald. Or Heil. Or Miccolis. Or Robeson. They've already done that. I know, and others know, it isn't true. But, They are ham radio so any disagreement with them is taken as a "mass insult" on hundreds of thousands of hams! We all participate in amateur radio. You do not. You have no role. That much is fact. As for the others who "know" that your dislike of amateur radio is real, they'd be guys like anonymous "John Smith", Frank the CBer, Brian Burke and your old friend, Colonel Morgan. They're all kindred spirits with you. They're with you, Len. They know you. I hardly know Len, I don't know frank or John Smith I know Brain abut the same as Len But as normal you want to play the game of credentcails Dave K8MN |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|