![]() |
More Real Estate Follies
KØHB wrote: "Dee Flint" wrote I have seen people proposing going entirely to voluntary band plans forHF instead of regulated splits ala Europe and thus making all modes legal throughout the entire band. I'm an enthusiastic user of CW, but I fully support such a plan. Let "market forces" and usage-centric gentlemens agreements determine band usage. Morse users currently can use that mode on literally all the amateur-allocated frequencies with the exception of the five channels on 5Mhz. And 220 FWTW. On a "larger" CW contest weekend they could (perfectly legally) use any frequency (that was not occupied) for CW contesting. Why should CW be alone in such a generous allocation? 73, de Hans, K0HB Now that's a finely crafted troll! |
Definitely Not Qualified
|
More Real Estate Follies
Paul Runninghorse Vigil
Senior Consultant 30 Years Experienced In Creative Real Estate Buying or Selling and Creative Real Estate Financing. Homes, Land, Hotels, Commercial, Trust Deeds and Real Estate Investigations. FREE Telephone Consultation Ph # 303-284-0636 Fax 303-284-0974 Was a Broker, Realtor and Owner Operator of Real Estate Brokerages and Mortgage Companies. * Refer-A-Friend www.capitalvigilfundingdept.com |
More Real Estate Follies
Paul Runninghorse Vigil
Senior Consultant 30 Years Experienced In Creative Real Estate Buying or Selling and Creative Real Estate Financing. Homes, Land, Hotels, Commercial, Trust Deeds and Real Estate Investigations. FREE Telephone Consultation Ph # 303-284-0636 Fax 303-284-0974 Was a Broker, Realtor and Owner Operator of Real Estate Brokerages and Mortgage Companies. * Refer-A-Friend www.capitalvigilfundingdept.com |
Definitely Not Qualified
From: on Dec 9, 6:28 pm
wrote: wrote: Jim, is this what you meant when you said that you "served in other ways?" Brian, You have written that phrase as a direct quote, and attributed it to me. Where have I written that I 'served in other ways'? So you haven't "served in other ways?" September 24, 2004; January 13, February 10, May 25 2005. shrug All my postings to newsgroups are in Google. Please provide a link to the posting(s) where I wrote what you claim I wrote. At's OK. I'll take your word for it that not only haven't you served, but that you haven't "served in other ways." Jimmie "serves" ceasar salads at the O-club on Satiddy nights. [hail ceasar...] Jimmie loves to re-argue, re-argue, re-argue old, old postings' content, perhaps hoping to THIS TIME being able to win one...:-) Jimmie be the "silent majority" type of wannabe...or maybe a Better-Than? He is "superior" and without fault in whatever he does. Just ask him and he will confirm that. Give Jimmie some slack(s). He might be organizing a charity group in memory of fallen hippie linemen who tye-dyed on active duty in the 60s? |
More Real Estate Follies
wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message k.net... wrote Kinda like people with no amateur radio license and little or no Morse Code experience trying to impose their will on those of us who *are* licensed and *do* use Morse Code. I haven't seen anyone, licensed or not, propose a change in the regulations that would affect my use of Morse code. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB I have seen people proposing going entirely to voluntary band plans for HF instead of regulated splits ala Europe and thus making all modes legal throughout the entire band. That could impact your use of Morse during the larger voice contests. Couldn't possibly. CW always gets through. With the number of hams in this country that could be a mess. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Thus one of the original reasons to test for Morse. It limits the number of people holding a license. ________________________________________________ End Quote No that was never one of the original reasons to test for Morse. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
Definitely Not Qualified
wrote: From: on Dec 9, 6:28 pm wrote: wrote: Jim, is this what you meant when you said that you "served in other ways?" Brian, You have written that phrase as a direct quote, and attributed it to me. Where have I written that I 'served in other ways'? So you haven't "served in other ways?" September 24, 2004; January 13, February 10, May 25 2005. shrug Len, thanks for serving up the specific dates of his attempts to claim some kind of honors, but he's just not worth my time. All my postings to newsgroups are in Google. Please provide a link to the posting(s) where I wrote what you claim I wrote. At's OK. I'll take your word for it that not only haven't you served, but that you haven't "served in other ways." Jimmie "serves" ceasar salads at the O-club on Satiddy nights. [hail ceasar...] He reminds me of Madeliene Al(most)bright saying that America no longer needs the "Marine Culture." Woefully uninformed. She's not worthy to preside over a barrel-burning detail for our deployed troops. Jimmie loves to re-argue, re-argue, re-argue old, old postings' content, perhaps hoping to THIS TIME being able to win one...:-) Hmmmm? OK, if he wants to reargue what he says he didn't say... Jimmie be the "silent majority" type of wannabe...or maybe a Better-Than? He is "superior" and without fault in whatever he does. Just ask him and he will confirm that. It's funny. A few years ago, I was surrounded by people serving in the military, and it almost appeared that everyone did. Most of us had been to the desert, to Honduras, to Korea, etc, etc, etc. Now that I'm out here with the "civils," its eye-opening and shocking. Give Jimmie some slack(s). He might be organizing a charity group in memory of fallen hippie linemen who tye-dyed on active duty in the 60s? If Jim want's to make some legitimate claim to how he served, then he can make it. If not then he can go to his grave regretting how he misspent his youth or how he "served in other ways" that are the equivalent of military service in his mind. Sad. |
More Real Estate Follies
Dee Flint wrote: wrote in message oups.com... Dee Flint wrote: "KØHB" wrote in message k.net... wrote Kinda like people with no amateur radio license and little or no Morse Code experience trying to impose their will on those of us who *are* licensed and *do* use Morse Code. I haven't seen anyone, licensed or not, propose a change in the regulations that would affect my use of Morse code. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB I have seen people proposing going entirely to voluntary band plans forHF instead of regulated splits ala Europe and thus making all modes legal throughout the entire band. That could impact your use of Morse during the larger voice contests. Couldn't possibly. CW always gets through. With the number of hams in this country that could be a mess. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Thus one of the original reasons to test for Morse. It limits the number of people holding a license. ________________________________________________ End Quote No that was never one of the original reasons to test for Morse. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE Yes, it was. See Google. |
More Real Estate Follies
wrote Why should CW be alone in such a generous allocation? 73, de Hans, K0HB Now that's a finely crafted troll! Not a troll at all, Brian. I think it's a fair question. Morse is allowed on virtually all amateur frequencies except 219MHz and 5MHz allocations. Being a CW operator, quite frankly I'm happy about the flexibility that gives me. But it's a mystery to me why all modes aren't treated in this generous manner, and why other CW operators seem so firmly opposed to the Canadian/European "market forces" model of frequency sharing. Beep beep de Hans, K0HB |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:34 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com