| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
March 20th 06, 03:40 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
|
|
#3
March 20th 06, 07:22 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: ToS violation steve wrote: and another Tos violation From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 March 17, 2006 following the FCC open meeting. "The plan is to keep those in the Wireless Bureau." nice to have somethng to discuss Discuss WHAT? A NON event? OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say This will have nothing to do with the "safety of ARS freqs", Mork. another ToS violation steve if we were being classed as public safety I am sure it improve our hold on those freqs Getting folks to rally and finally push through ONE of the "spectrum protection act" bills that has been in front of Congress over the last 20 years WOULD, however no one seems to want to REALLY "do" anything to make those happen. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#4
March 20th 06, 09:19 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
cheated an old friend wrote: K4YZ wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: ToS violation steve Where? wrote: and another Tos violation Where? From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 March 17, 2006 following the FCC open meeting. "The plan is to keep those in the Wireless Bureau." nice to have somethng to discuss Discuss WHAT? A NON event? OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say This will have nothing to do with the "safety of ARS freqs", Mork. another ToS violation steve Where? if we were being classed as public safety I am sure it improve our hold on those freqs No we won't. TRY and understand the difference between "public safety" and "Amateur Radio", Mork. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#5
March 20th 06, 10:03 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
yet another thread hijacked by steve in his campaign of violeting Google rules
K4YZ wrote: cheated an old friend wrote: yet another |
|
#6
March 20th 06, 11:34 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 March 17, 2006 -------------------- ==AMATEUR RADIO POISED TO STAY WITHIN FCC WIRELESS TELECOMMUNICATIONS BUREAU The FCC approved a proposal March 17 to create a new Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau (PS&HSB) that would assume some functions now under the umbrella of the Wireless Telecommunications Bureau (WTB). But it appears that the Amateur Radio Service--now within the WTB's Public Safety and Critical Infrastructure Division, headed by Michael J. Wilhelm, WS6BR--will remain within the WTB, according to Anthony Dale, Acting Director of the FCC's Office of Managing Director (OMD). "The Critical Infrastructure piece--that's things like taxi cabs, Amateur Radio, chemical plants, all that type of thing--those are not public safety-specific functions," Dale said in response to a reporter's question following the FCC open meeting. "The plan is to keep those in the Wireless Bureau." nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. I'm just dumbfounded why we're wasting spectrum on high-definition TV? Anyone who wanted better TV has cable or dish. |
|
#7
March 21st 06, 03:40 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote:
an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik I'm just dumbfounded why we're wasting spectrum on high-definition TV? yep but that is money and if the money for it comes to the FCC at al it might do some good by acident Anyone who wanted better TV has cable or dish. yep _________________________________________ Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server More than 140,000 groups Unlimited download http://www.usenetzone.com to open account |
|
#8
March 22nd 06, 11:19 AM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". I'm just dumbfounded why we're wasting spectrum on high-definition TV? yep but that is money and if the money for it comes to the FCC at al it might do some good by acident Somebody will make some money. Anyone who wanted better TV has cable or dish. yep |
|
#9
March 22nd 06, 12:46 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
, N0IMD, Brian P Burke wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: nobodys old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. No...it means someone may have THOUGHT about it...At best the article appears to simply say that it's not on the table for whatever reasons and that it's not on anyone's agenda to do otherwise. HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". More assinine, unfounded BS from Brain P Burke. There's not ONE bit of media release about Amatuer Radio as it pertains to the most recent disaster response in Louisiana that is anything BUT positive vis-a-vis Amateur Radio. WHERE do you come up with these assinine assertions, Burke? Two years ago you started in on this line about how ARES/RACES/MARS would not be able to respond or sustain a disaster relief communications, yet there's been one significant disaster after another, none the least of which being Katrina, and in every case where those agencies responded there's been nothing but positive press...And I am NOT talking about ARRL stuff...Real, mainstream media...CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. The Amateur Radio Serivce, under the banners of MARS, ARES, RACES, etc, has more than lived up to it's claims of disaster communications support, yet you continue to make a fool out of yourself claiming otherwise. Burke, WHY do you continue this silly behaviour when you've been proven wrong over and over and over...?!?! Idiot. Steve, K4YZ |
|
#10
March 22nd 06, 03:06 PM
posted to rec.radio.amateur.policy
|
|||
|
|||
|
The ARS NOT to move to Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau
wrote: wrote: On 20 Mar 2006 15:34:35 -0800, wrote: an old friend wrote: wrote: From: The ARRL Letter Vol. 25, No. 11 nice to have somethng to discuss OTOH WE are NOT seen as a public saety function. I wonder how hard the ARRL worked to get us classified with PS&HSB? did they work toward that gol at all? you are still a memebr you might ask? The first I heard of it was their announcement that we aren't being reclassified. That tells me that they were working on it. likely i agree HMMMM not good for the safety of ARS freqs id say Perhaps. sorry you areit isn't "preahps it is "not Good" it may also be not bad but surely being classiefied with EMS and therefore above taxi cabs would have been good for us in the long run both here and in our neighboor Canada where vhf bandwidth is also at rsik Had we been reclassed, there might be actual demands that the ARS would have to live up to other than "goodwill.". and we do just do it in an disorganized keystone copish way I'm just dumbfounded why we're wasting spectrum on high-definition TV? yep but that is money and if the money for it comes to the FCC at al it might do some good by acident Somebody will make some money. Anyone who wanted better TV has cable or dish. yep |
Hybrid Mode
