Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Mark" wrote in message ... On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 10:45:45 -0600, "PowerHouse Communications" wrote: This "group" is just a small part of what's out there all over the US. There is a website that I have actively linked to from my own site for over a year now. I believe this is a good thing. Police, including in my small town here, have a tendency to let their power go to their heads... I have personally encountered, and have heard of, many "power trips" with the local and state police around here. Somebody needs to put them in their place, and let them know just who it is they are working for, and just who it is that is paying their wages... Who they work for and who pays their wages is irrelevant. They are to uphold the law and obey the law. If they are doing this, they should have no problem having voyeurs follow them around the city. Try telling them that around here... Here's an example: Being in Michigan, a person needs a permit to possess a scanner in their vehicle. Local "enforcement" doesn't want you to listen in on their activities. Of the three people in my family that applied for and received those permits, I'm the only one that still has one. The other two have had them revoked due to these "criminals in uniform". I'm thinking that the only reason I still have mine is that I work 3rd shift and am not out much during the day, thus not being as "visible" or "accessible" as the other two are... Around here they actually make up stories and send them to the Communications Director in charge of issuing the permits. They make erroneous claims (see below) that can't be proven either way by either party, but since they are "the law", their word has more power than the common citizen, thus no recourse for the innocent. As I have stated and will continue to state, corruption runs rampant in my area... 1: One was "following emergency calls and showing up at the scene". Funny, he was in the area, fishing, before the call ever even came in, but it was a good excuse to pull his license... 2: One was "convicted" of "publishing" because he was found to possess a notebook with a list of frequencies in it that he had programmed into his scanner. Another good reason to pull a license... CopWatch: http://www.copwatch.com/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Which older scanners support PL decoding? | Scanner | |||
FS: RS Pro 2067, Pro -2035 and Pro- 2006 Scanners | Swap | |||
Digital scanners online...Listen now ! | Scanner | |||
Are scanners legal in Manitoba? A few questions... | Scanner | |||
Radio Shack to discontinue Police Scanners. | Scanner |