Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#27
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() He'sDoneItAgain wrote: Looks like "no-code" is finally here... http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_publi...C-269012A1.pdf This sentence summarizes it very well: This change eliminates an unnecessary regulatory burden that may discourage current amateur radio operators from advancing their skills and participating more fully in the benefits of amateur radio. It's about 30 years too late, but a start in the right direction. Next we have to eliminate the current test and replace it with something that actually tests for skills that are important. A test that combines knowlege of theory with the skills to safely setup and courteously operate a station. Once potential ham passes that single test he is granted full operating privileges on all amateur bands. Currently licensed hams would be grandfathered in with full operating privileges. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? | Policy | |||
05-235 - Any new procode test arguments? | Policy | |||
Why You Don't Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy |