| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
December 19th 06, 09:38 AM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?
|
|
#2
December 19th 06, 12:45 PM
posted to rec.radio.shortwave
|
|||
|
|||
|
The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?
dead of night wrote: wrote: Its about as ugly as one of those see through telephones.I don't own one and I don't ever want one either. cuhulin Thanks for the replies, everyone. Sangean claims the new model, DT200VX, has better AM reception. If true, what might have been done to the model to improve the AM reception? I am definately not a "radio geek", just a radio lover, but if it is any larger then maybe a larger ferrite-rod, a tuned input loop (whatever that is), or an improved receiver chip (whatever that does). You should definately try out the Sony ICF-S10MK2 - it's analog-tuned so there is no PLL synthesizer noise... |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Sangean 404 | Shortwave | |||
| Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR | Shortwave | |||
| Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
| KA1102 vs. Sangean 606 vs. Tecsun PL230 | Shortwave | |||
| Sangean Problems? | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
