Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old December 18th 06, 06:39 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 50
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?

Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?

  #2   Report Post  
Old December 18th 06, 09:14 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?


dead of night wrote:
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?


I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with
my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a
review of it on RadioIntel.com:

http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm

It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on
SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under
"analogAMforever":

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics

Awesome radio for $10 !

  #3   Report Post  
Old December 19th 06, 12:26 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?


Brenda Ann wrote:
--
Say no to institutionalized interference.
Just say NO to HD/IBOC!
wrote in message
oups.com...

dead of night wrote:
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?


I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with
my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a
review of it on RadioIntel.com:

http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm

It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on
SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under
"analogAMforever":

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics

Awesome radio for $10 !


It's not a bad radio. I received one as a gift a while back. But it doesn't
even have full AM X-band coverage.


From Maryland, there doesn't seem to be much in the new X-band, anyway;

the radio is awesome enough that it doesn't really matter. I bought
three for myself, so if I drop or lose one, who cares at $10, and I can
always have a relatively new radio to play with, and can always order
plenty more ! With the Sangeans running $60 - $70, one might as well
get a Degen SW radio for the same price, plus if one needs to replace
it, there is something to cry about !

  #4   Report Post  
Old December 19th 06, 12:41 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?


Brenda Ann wrote:
--
Say no to institutionalized interference.
Just say NO to HD/IBOC!
wrote in message
oups.com...

dead of night wrote:
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?


I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with
my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a
review of it on RadioIntel.com:

http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm

It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on
SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under
"analogAMforever":

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics

Awesome radio for $10 !


It's not a bad radio. I received one as a gift a while back. But it doesn't
even have full AM X-band coverage.


There is little in the X-band from Maryland, anyway. Sangean's quality
sucks and Sony rules !

  #5   Report Post  
Old December 19th 06, 01:08 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 30
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?


dead of night wrote:
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?


- almost bought it, then got this one . .

Sangean Dt120..

http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...alty/1048.html

http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...ty/1048lrg.jpg

One Battery, all kinds of good sounds, 15 presets;

can pick up WWVA / 1170 right here in NYC..

Man can't have too many radios . . .



  #6   Report Post  
Old December 19th 06, 03:01 AM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?

Its about as ugly as one of those see through telephones.I don't own one
and I don't ever want one either.
cuhulin

  #9   Report Post  
Old December 20th 06, 07:55 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Dec 2006
Posts: 321
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?


I.P. Yurin wrote:
On 18 Dec 2006 13:14:53 -0800, wrote:

dead of night wrote:
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model,
I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception.
Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better
sound. Any opinions? What do you think?


I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with
my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a
review of it on RadioIntel.com:

http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm

This review is bizarre. Even ignoring that it compares the Sony to an
R75... And that it evaluates the sony for dxing... I'm still befuddled
by this: It evaluates the $10 Sony portable in conjunction with a loop
antenna that's gotta be 6 times as large as the radio! (And more
expensive.)

Who carries a loop antenna around to use with their shirt pocket
portable??? If you're willing to do that, might as well just by a
larger radio.

Would have been nice to see the data for the Sony as it is actually
going to be used -- by itself.
--
Col. I.P. Yurin
Commissariat of Internal Security

Stakhanovite
Order of Lenin (1937)
Hero of Socialist Labor (1939)


Well, with its internal ferrite-bar antenna, I can get up to 1200 miles
nighttime AM - not bad for a $10 radio !

  #10   Report Post  
Old December 20th 06, 08:13 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 8,861
Default The new, Sangean DT200VX- what do you think?

Sony ICF-S10MK2 radio.I have one of those.I bought it over a year ago at
a Walgreens store.I don't think it's all that great of a radio
though.(by my very discerning ears) I played with it for a while (about
ten minutes) then I put it in a drawer and forgot all about it.
cuhulin

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Sangean 404 S Walters Shortwave 12 May 15th 06 02:23 PM
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR ngu Shortwave 19 January 30th 06 11:31 AM
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna RHF Shortwave 0 January 16th 06 09:12 PM
KA1102 vs. Sangean 606 vs. Tecsun PL230 Juan Gonzalez Shortwave 7 September 17th 04 04:18 AM
Sangean Problems? DeWayne Shortwave 11 March 10th 04 10:36 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:58 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017