Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V.
C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model, I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception. Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better sound. Any opinions? What do you think? |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dead of night wrote: Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V. C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model, I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception. Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better sound. Any opinions? What do you think? I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a review of it on RadioIntel.com: http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under "analogAMforever": http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics Awesome radio for $10 ! |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann wrote: -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! wrote in message oups.com... dead of night wrote: Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V. C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model, I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception. Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better sound. Any opinions? What do you think? I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a review of it on RadioIntel.com: http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under "analogAMforever": http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics Awesome radio for $10 ! It's not a bad radio. I received one as a gift a while back. But it doesn't even have full AM X-band coverage. From Maryland, there doesn't seem to be much in the new X-band, anyway; the radio is awesome enough that it doesn't really matter. I bought three for myself, so if I drop or lose one, who cares at $10, and I can always have a relatively new radio to play with, and can always order plenty more ! With the Sangeans running $60 - $70, one might as well get a Degen SW radio for the same price, plus if one needs to replace it, there is something to cry about ! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Brenda Ann wrote: -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! wrote in message oups.com... dead of night wrote: Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V. C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model, I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception. Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better sound. Any opinions? What do you think? I just received the Sony ICF-S10MK2 pocket-radio and it is on-par with my more expensive digital PLL radios - if you are interested, here is a review of it on RadioIntel.com: http://www.radiointel.com/review-sonys10mk2.htm It was only $10, including shipping, from J$R Music (also, on SonyStyle.com). Here is the review, I wrote on Amazon, under "analogAMforever": http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/cus...&s=electronics Awesome radio for $10 ! It's not a bad radio. I received one as a gift a while back. But it doesn't even have full AM X-band coverage. There is little in the X-band from Maryland, anyway. Sangean's quality sucks and Sony rules ! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dead of night wrote: Hi. The new Sangean DT200VX is the replacement for the famous, DT200V. C Crane claims "better AM reception." Although I have the old model, I have ordered a new one because of the even better Am reception. Also, the new one has a backlight, and is supposed to have better sound. Any opinions? What do you think? - almost bought it, then got this one . . Sangean Dt120.. http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...alty/1048.html http://www.universal-radio.com/catal...ty/1048lrg.jpg One Battery, all kinds of good sounds, 15 presets; can pick up WWVA / 1170 right here in NYC.. Man can't have too many radios . . . |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its about as ugly as one of those see through telephones.I don't own one
and I don't ever want one either. cuhulin |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() dead of night wrote: wrote: Its about as ugly as one of those see through telephones.I don't own one and I don't ever want one either. cuhulin Thanks for the replies, everyone. Sangean claims the new model, DT200VX, has better AM reception. If true, what might have been done to the model to improve the AM reception? I am definately not a "radio geek", just a radio lover, but if it is any larger then maybe a larger ferrite-rod, a tuned input loop (whatever that is), or an improved receiver chip (whatever that does). You should definately try out the Sony ICF-S10MK2 - it's analog-tuned so there is no PLL synthesizer noise... |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sony ICF-S10MK2 radio.I have one of those.I bought it over a year ago at
a Walgreens store.I don't think it's all that great of a radio though.(by my very discerning ears) I played with it for a while (about ten minutes) then I put it in a drawer and forgot all about it. cuhulin |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sangean 404 | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-909 vs. Sony ICF-7600GR | Shortwave | |||
Sangean ATS-505 Receiver - Improving your Shortwave Radio Reception with an External Shortwave Listener's (SWL) Antenna | Shortwave | |||
KA1102 vs. Sangean 606 vs. Tecsun PL230 | Shortwave | |||
Sangean Problems? | Shortwave |