On Feb 22, 11:15 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Gueriteº" wrote in message

...

They don't want you gringos to know that they are talking about you.

No, that is not it.

1 - SAP in Spanish offers a signficant new audience for English
langauge TV.

2 - SAP in English offers little or no benfit to Spanish TV's.
SAP is not a requirement, so the incentive is purely economic:
more salable viewership.
Since there is no return on investment for English SAP,
no station will do it.

DE - Once again I will re-post myself :

-R- It's not about the Money
- - - It's About Fairness and Equality between All Peoples
Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans; African-Americans
and yes even European-Americans.

In the 'spirit' of true Bilingualism - It Ought To Be A Law !

If 5%-or-more of the 'potential' TV and Radio Listeners in a
Broadcast Area are English Speakers then By-Law and the
SAP on all Non-English Language TV and Radio Stations
"MUSH" Broadcast in English the Programming Content.
- - - Basically the same Requirement for Voting and Public
Documents with all "Minority Groups" and Non-Spanish
Speaking Americans are rapidly become the Second Largest
Minority Group behind Hispanics in Hispanic Dominated
Urban and Sub-Urban Areas. It is "The Duty" of Public
Broadcasters to SERVE "Minority Communities" and now
in many cases the Spanish Language "Only" Media is
neglecting the Non-Spanish-Speaking Americans. The FCC
should set in and 'regulate' these Broadcasters who as you
so aptly point out are only concerned about the Money.
A FCC Broadcast License 'implies' Public Service and
English SAP Broadcasting should be a Mandated Public
Service of every Broadcaster broadcasting in any language
other-than English. The Rights of English-Only-Speakers
MUST BE PROTECTED where They Are A Minority.
Once Again - It's About Fairness and Equality between
All Peoples : Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans;
African-Americans and yes even European-Americans.
-Equal Media Access- It's not about the Money - It's about
Basic Human Rights For All -including- English-Only-Speakers.

PLUS - Just thing of all the New Jobs it would create
for Bilingual Peoples especially for those 'whos'
Primary Language is English.
- - - Affirmative Action for English-Only-Speakers
When Do We Want It - now, Now. NOW !
Where Do We Want It - On the SAP Channel of All
Spanish Only TV Stations do it now, Do It Now. DO IT NOW !

Hey DE - You could be the new Czar of a National
Spanish-to-English SAP Initative with mucho Federal Funding.
Funded by a 1% Nation-Wide Radio and TV Marketing Sales
Tax paid by Advertisers to bring English into Every Home.

La Igualdad es Una Calle de Dos Maneras
{ In my best Babel Fish Translation }
Meaning : Equality IS a Two Way Street.

si, Si. SI ! sé, Sé. SE ! - once again . . .
it's better that i should learn spanish ~ El RHF Olé !
.
.
.. .





"RHF" wrote in message
oups.com...
R A N T

Why the H*ll Don't the Spanish Language Radio and TV Stations
have English on the SAP Channel ?

i want to know ~ RHF
.
.
. .- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Feb 22, 11:29 am, "bpnjensen" wrote:
On Feb 22, 12:40 am, "RHF" wrote:

R A N T

Why the H*ll Don't the Spanish Language Radio and TV Stations
have English on the SAP Channel ?

i want to know ~ RHF

I have to confess - I am baffled at why you'd want to see it.

I speak a little Spanish, and I can tell you that, between the bodice-
rippers and inane comedy shows and etc., there is little of value
there (at least to this gringo).

Bruce Jensen

BpnJ - What About The Rich Hispanic Culture ?

As for me - i do not subscribe to the idea
"Una vez un Gringo Siempre un Gringo por Siempre !"

BpnJ - Why some day you could be a "Baldomero Hensen"

no gritan los rasgones para mí california
usted era aztlán mucho antes le conocía ~ RHF
.
.
.. .

On Feb 22, 3:05 pm, "http://www.lookaboutusa.com/"
wrote:
On Feb 23, 9:43 am, wrote:

Most of the Vietnamese I ever met/talked with,,, could speak ersatch
English Language.I never saw a spanish that I liked.You either speak my
American English kind of language or go F... yourself!
cuhulin

- You guys dont watch or listen to SBS

? ? ? SBS ? ? ?

The Special Broadcasting Service (SBS)
http://www20.sbs.com.au/sbscorporate/index.php?id=
Australia's Multi-Cultural and Multi-Lingual Public Broadcaster.

SBS is unique. Its Radio and Television services broadcast
in more languages than any other network in the world.

Question - You guys dont watch or listen to SBS
-R- Being an American living in the good old USofA - No.

The USofA Needs an FCC Department of SBS to protect
the Rights of English-Only-Speakers to Full Media Access.


Luchar la buena Lucha para las Fronteras de la Cultura
de la Lengua - libertad, Libertad. ¡cLibertad! ~ El RHF Olé !
.
.
.. .

Shove your spanish up your a.. Sideways!
cuhulin

My very first night at Tan Son Nhut.Next morning,Helicopters to Can
Tho.(go look it up) I was looking around,by one of those old dried out
not working street fountains in the middle of a street in Can Tho.A
Vietnamese guy about sixteen or seventeen years old (I was twenty two
years old at the time) walked over from somewhere.I knew not his
language and he knew not mine.He knew enough words of the English
language that we could converse,Intelligently.
cuhulin

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 22, 11:15 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:


1 - SAP in Spanish offers a signficant new audience for English
langauge TV.

2 - SAP in English offers little or no benfit to Spanish TV's.
SAP is not a requirement, so the incentive is purely economic:
more salable viewership.
Since there is no return on investment for English SAP,
no station will do it.

DE - Once again I will re-post myself :

-R- It's not about the Money
- - - It's About Fairness and Equality between All Peoples
Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans; African-Americans
and yes even European-Americans.

There is no interest, either, in doing SAP to English of the Asian channels
in LA and San Francisco. This is not unfair, just realistic.

In the 'spirit' of true Bilingualism - It Ought To Be A Law !

A law like that would violate freedom of speech, by saying that if you want
to use any language other than English you have to incur additional and
considerable expense (Simultanteous translaters run as much as $500 an hour,
you know) while English stations do npot have to do this. Clear violation
and an impediment to expression.

If 5%-or-more of the 'potential' TV and Radio Listeners in a
Broadcast Area are English Speakers then By-Law and the
SAP on all Non-English Language TV and Radio Stations
"MUSH" Broadcast in English the Programming Content.

Nearly nobody is going to listen. Imagine trying to do SAP on a soap opera
to english... the translation and dubbing of an English aoudio track would
cost around $10,000 to $20,000 an hour unless you did all the dialogue in
one voice.

And then the ads... most creative does not translate at all, and the
advertisers woulod be furious.

As I said, even newscasts would be $500 to $1000 an hour for one
simultaneous translator.

And nobody would listen.

Total weekly cost: about $700,000 per channel.

A FCC Broadcast License 'implies' Public Service and
English SAP Broadcasting should be a Mandated Public
Service of every Broadcaster broadcasting in any language
other-than English. The Rights of English-Only-Speakers
MUST BE PROTECTED where They Are A Minority.
Once Again - It's About Fairness and Equality between
All Peoples : Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans;
African-Americans and yes even European-Americans.
-Equal Media Access- It's not about the Money - It's about
Basic Human Rights For All -including- English-Only-Speakers.

How does a classic rock staiton serve me? I hate classic rock, so it does
not serve me. But it does serve lovers of that kind of music. Same with
Spanish langauge stations... stations were never intended to serve everyone,
and the licensee has broad discretion in which segment of the audience they
want to serve, and can serve that niche exclusively.

PLUS - Just thing of all the New Jobs it would create
for Bilingual Peoples especially for those 'whos'
Primary Language is English.

It would bankrupt stations, and provide no useful service.

It also violates the US Constitution quite royally.

This point will be moot in about 20 years when real-time hand-held
electronic audio language translators will be available.

"David Eduardo" wrote in message
...

"RHF" wrote in message
ups.com...
On Feb 22, 11:15 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:


1 - SAP in Spanish offers a signficant new audience for English
langauge TV.

2 - SAP in English offers little or no benfit to Spanish TV's.
SAP is not a requirement, so the incentive is purely economic:
more salable viewership.
Since there is no return on investment for English SAP,
no station will do it.

DE - Once again I will re-post myself :

-R- It's not about the Money
- - - It's About Fairness and Equality between All Peoples
Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans; African-Americans
and yes even European-Americans.

There is no interest, either, in doing SAP to English of the Asian
channels
in LA and San Francisco. This is not unfair, just realistic.

In the 'spirit' of true Bilingualism - It Ought To Be A Law !

A law like that would violate freedom of speech, by saying that if you
want
to use any language other than English you have to incur additional and
considerable expense (Simultanteous translaters run as much as $500 an
hour,
you know) while English stations do npot have to do this. Clear violation
and an impediment to expression.

If 5%-or-more of the 'potential' TV and Radio Listeners in a
Broadcast Area are English Speakers then By-Law and the
SAP on all Non-English Language TV and Radio Stations
"MUSH" Broadcast in English the Programming Content.

Nearly nobody is going to listen. Imagine trying to do SAP on a soap opera
to english... the translation and dubbing of an English aoudio track would
cost around $10,000 to $20,000 an hour unless you did all the dialogue in
one voice.

And then the ads... most creative does not translate at all, and the
advertisers woulod be furious.

As I said, even newscasts would be $500 to $1000 an hour for one
simultaneous translator.

And nobody would listen.

Total weekly cost: about $700,000 per channel.

A FCC Broadcast License 'implies' Public Service and
English SAP Broadcasting should be a Mandated Public
Service of every Broadcaster broadcasting in any language
other-than English. The Rights of English-Only-Speakers
MUST BE PROTECTED where They Are A Minority.
Once Again - It's About Fairness and Equality between
All Peoples : Asian-Americans; Hispanic-Americans;
African-Americans and yes even European-Americans.
-Equal Media Access- It's not about the Money - It's about
Basic Human Rights For All -including- English-Only-Speakers.

How does a classic rock staiton serve me? I hate classic rock, so it does
not serve me. But it does serve lovers of that kind of music. Same with
Spanish langauge stations... stations were never intended to serve
everyone,
and the licensee has broad discretion in which segment of the audience
they
want to serve, and can serve that niche exclusively.

PLUS - Just thing of all the New Jobs it would create
for Bilingual Peoples especially for those 'whos'
Primary Language is English.

It would bankrupt stations, and provide no useful service.

It also violates the US Constitution quite royally.

Now you done got my little doggy to barking.
cuhulin

I never heard of sbs (whatever that is?) before.I am not going to look
it up either.Whatever it is,I say it SUCKS!
cuhulin

I used to read them Vigilantes comic books,back in the 1950's.Ever since
then,my opinion of Real law is VIGILANTE LAW.
cuhulin