On Mar 9, 7:46 am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"RHF" wrote in message

oups.com...







This is a Valid Static When . . . {Drum Roll Please ! ! !}
51% of the AM Radio Listeners to these AM{HD} Radio
Stations Have AM {HD} Radios +and+ Are Listening to
AM {HD} Radio Broadcasts.
.
However =IF= These AM Radio Listeners are in-fact 'still'
Listening to AM Radio Stations with : AM {Analog} Radios
+and+ Are Listening to AM {Analog} Radio Broadcasts.
.
It All Means Nothing "Nada" [.] {FYI - Thats A Big Period}
.
Numb3rs Have Meaning -and- Are Often Meaningless ~ RHF
.
This Comes from That Place {Both Near and Far}
Where Everything Adds Up to Nothing . . .
[ Die Grosse Welt Von Nichts ]

- What it means is that the owners of the major AMs
- know that they must do something to change AM...
- either HD or move the format to FM.

The later would seam to be the better 'choice'

Long Term IBOC FM "HD" Radio would give them :
1 - Better Overall Local Market Signal Coverage
2 - Better Sound Quality and the 'option' for a
Second Audio {Data} Channel.
3 - Plus Younger Listener Demographics
- - - So . . . Why Waste the Time, Money and
Technology on IBOC AM "HD" Radio which as
you admit is at best a short term lossing game.

hey 'hd' buggy whips didn't work either ~ RHF