http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

"David" wrote in message
...
http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

The fact is that XHLNC is operating legally per US law and FCC
regulations... KPFK has no claim to protection in San Diego.

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In et posted
on Sun, 12 Aug 2007 19:22:43 GMT, David Eduardo wrote: Begin


"David" wrote in message
. ..
http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

The fact is that XHLNC is operating legally per US law and FCC
regulations... KPFK has no claim to protection in San Diego.


You can argue that point until you're as brown in the face as the
chicano you pretend to be, but until San Diego again has unfettered
reception of an alternative to all the right wing screed, I'll complain.

A Chicano is a US born person of Hispanic culture of Mexican heritage,
something I am not...

And, speaking of things that are "not" you can not change the fact that KPFK
does not have a protected signal in SD County, and the operation of XHLNC is
100% legal. There is also no right to being able to receive any particular
format, or the 13 reggae fans in Duluth would have a station for them.

KPFK barely gets listening in Los Angeles. Were is different, we would have
similar formats on commercial stations. In LA, KPFK is 43rd out of all
stations, while the combination of KFI, KABC, KRLA have 15 times more
listening. Despite having one of the two or three best FM signals in LA,
nearly nobody is listening.

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:15:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

Despite having one of the two or three best FM signals in LA,
nearly nobody is listening.

Your only clue as to how many are listening
is based on how many choose to participate in some intrusive survey,
an activity I'd guess is shunned by folk in Pacifica's audience.

That is pretty much the stock answer by stations... or partisans of
stations... that do terribly in the ratings.

It's amazing that forty-some other stations have listeners, and many more
listeners, who do participate in ratings polls.

And, even if it had listeners, which it does not, KPFK has no "entitlement"
to protection from interference in the San Diego market area.

David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason, woke up and scrawled:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:15:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

Despite having one of the two or three best FM signals in LA,
nearly nobody is listening.

Your only clue as to how many are listening
is based on how many choose to participate in some intrusive survey,
an activity I'd guess is shunned by folk in Pacifica's audience.

That is pretty much the stock answer by stations... or partisans of
stations... that do terribly in the ratings.

It's amazing that forty-some other stations have listeners, and many more
listeners, who do participate in ratings polls.

And, even if it had listeners, which it does not, KPFK has no "entitlement"
to protection from interference in the San Diego market area.

You need to be deported to Ecuador.

dxAce wrote:

David 'Eduardo' Frackelton Gleason, woke up and scrawled:

"Bart Bailey" wrote in message
...
In posted on
Sun, 12 Aug 2007 15:15:21 -0700, David Eduardo wrote: Begin

Despite having one of the two or three best FM signals in LA,
nearly nobody is listening.

Your only clue as to how many are listening
is based on how many choose to participate in some intrusive survey,
an activity I'd guess is shunned by folk in Pacifica's audience.

That is pretty much the stock answer by stations... or partisans of
stations... that do terribly in the ratings.

It's amazing that forty-some other stations have listeners, and many more
listeners, who do participate in ratings polls.

And, even if it had listeners, which it does not, KPFK has no "entitlement"
to protection from interference in the San Diego market area.

You need to be deported to Ecuador.

And then you can start some radio stations which you can claim to "own", even
though they are not really in your name!

I get up every damn morning and LMFAO at you, you fraudulent little prancer.

On Aug 12, 11:59 am, David wrote:
http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

David - Mexico + Illegal = We Have A Match ! ~ RHF

On Aug 12, 12:22 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"David" wrote in message

...

http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

The fact is that XHLNC is operating legally per US law and FCC
regulations... KPFK has no claim to protection in San Diego.


Border stations have always been a gray area. Mexico has never been
very keen on FCC style radio regulations, and since the border
stations are a long ways away from Mexico City, they do whatever they
want. In the 1930s MW border stations operated with hair curling
wattage levels. In one case, a border station regularly blew away
Philadelphia's KYW at night. After WW2, the border blasters mostly
shut down. Today, border radio is mostly a problem in California and
Texas's Rio Grande Valley, the only places with significant numbers of
people living on the line. Stations regularly set up antennas in
Mexico and broadcast in English. They're effectively beyond any
regulation-the Mexicans don't care, and the US can't touch them. If
Pacifica Radio wants to get out of XHLNC's shadow, I would suggest
they move. But practical solutions are beyond libs, they'd rather
whine.

On Aug 13, 8:15 pm, American Insurgent wrote:
On Aug 12, 12:22 pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:

"David" wrote in message

.. .

http://www.xlnc1.org/newsletter.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XHLNC-FM

The fact is that XHLNC is operating legally per US law and FCC
regulations... KPFK has no claim to protection in San Diego.

Border stations have always been a gray area. Mexico has never been
very keen on FCC style radio regulations, and since the border
stations are a long ways away from Mexico City, they do whatever they
want. In the 1930s MW border stations operated with hair curling
wattage levels. In one case, a border station regularly blew away
Philadelphia's KYW at night. After WW2, the border blasters mostly
shut down. Today, border radio is mostly a problem in California and
Texas's Rio Grande Valley, the only places with significant numbers of
people living on the line. Stations regularly set up antennas in
Mexico and broadcast in English. They're effectively beyond any
regulation-the Mexicans don't care, and the US can't touch them. If
Pacifica Radio wants to get out of XHLNC's shadow, I would suggest
they move. But practical solutions are beyond libs, they'd rather
whine.

XERB-AM : The Mighty 1090 kHz use to claim that they
had 50 KW over Los Angeles - Which meant that they
were putting out a lot more down in Mexico. ~ RHF
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XERB-AM

American Insurgent wrote:

...

From your text, perhaps a solution is suggested; simply move Pacifica
Radio across the border, pump the output to 100KW+ and live happily ever
after ...

Regards,
JS