Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Nov 21, 6:55 am, wrote:
wrote Regarding ringing, the sharper the filter, the more it rings. You can't fight physics. I really annoys me how people think digital is the solution to everything without really understanding the nuances. You have obviously never worked a top line radio like the Icom IC-756 PRO III on CW with a narrow DSP filter. I assure you that even as narrow as 50 hertz THERE IS NO RINGING If you don't believe me I am quite prepared to e-mail anyone an MP3 recording of the 50 Hertz filter working a beacon. I also have many DX mates who work CW beacons and use Timewave DSP filters right down to 8 hertz and I have never heard them complain of ringing. John Plimmer, Montagu, Western Cape Province, South Africa South 33 d 47 m 32 s, East 20 d 07 m 32 s RX Icom IC-756 PRO III with MW mods Drake SW8 & ERGO software Sony 7600D, GE SRIII, Redsun RP2100 BW XCR 30, Sangean 803A. Antenna's RF Systems DX 1 Pro Mk II, Datong AD-270 Kiwa MW Loop, PAORDT Roelof mini-whiphttp://www.dxing.info/about/dxers/plimmer.dx I have a JSP digital. Narrow the BW down, it rings. Believe whatever you want, but you can't fight physics. Now there is a trick you can do on beacons to get less ringing, but it is a noncausal solution. If you are just IDing beacons, you don't need real time DSP. Recprd the audio on your PC. You reverse the audio, filter it, reverse it again, then filter again. This puts some of the filter artifacts before the beacon pings, rather than all the artifacts occuring after the ping. No DSP in a radio can do this. See, I like DSP, but I use it where it does some good. I don't hammer with a screw driver. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Mixing high side versus low side and (f1 - f2) versus (f1 + f2) | Homebrew | |||
796 versus 780 | Scanner | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
IC-735 versus IC-726 | Dx | |||
ic-735 versus ic-726 | General |