| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave" wrote in message ... You are incapable of doing it because you work for a bloated corporation who wants to make money. Radio should be a public service that hopefully turns a profit, not a sour milk cash cow. As was proven when the FCC mandated content percentages and such, listeners stayed away from any time period where such programming ran. When radio is run as a public service, there is little listening. The story of the BBC, Radio Luxembourg and the pirates shows that the BBC, a venerable public service, did not satisfy the needs of most Brits; the Bebe had to add new services and Britain had to allow commercial radio because even the politicians realized that the public was very unhappy. It's sort of KPFK vs. KIIS. The interest in what you crave is miniscule. Most of the world has national radio, not a lot of local content... because it's been seen that the FCC localism policy that goes back to the 30's was based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what listeners wanted. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Eduardo wrote:
It's sort of KPFK vs. KIIS. The interest in what you crave is miniscule. Most of the world has national radio, not a lot of local content... because it's been seen that the FCC localism policy that goes back to the 30's was based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what listeners wanted. KPFK has an anal blockage of some sort. They are a terrible radio station. Pacifica in Houston is a much better example. Radio has a responsibility to provide a balanced diet. KIIS is like eating audio junk food. Localism can be as simple as having a Music Director in-house, breaking regional hits, getting input from dance clubs, etc., rather than relying on bozo consultants. |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Dave" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: It's sort of KPFK vs. KIIS. The interest in what you crave is miniscule. Most of the world has national radio, not a lot of local content... because it's been seen that the FCC localism policy that goes back to the 30's was based on a fundamental misunderstanding of what listeners wanted. KPFK has an anal blockage of some sort. They are a terrible radio station. Pacifica in Houston is a much better example. Radio has a responsibility to provide a balanced diet. KIIS is like eating audio junk food. The Houston staiton does no better audience wise than the LA one. KIIS, on the other hand, reaches a third of all LA residents each week. No matter what you think, in its target of 12-34, it reaches nearly half of all persons weekly. They must be doing something right to serve that group with an entertaining product. Localism can be as simple as having a Music Director in-house, breaking regional hits, getting input from dance clubs, etc., rather than relying on bozo consultants. Music is already done the way you say you wish it were done. And club play is relevant only to dance formats, of which there are none in LA: |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Eduardo - Serious Question For you | Shortwave | |||
| Hey, Eduardo - look! | Shortwave | |||
| Eduardo | Shortwave | |||
| Here's to you, Eduardo! | Shortwave | |||
| Does Eduardo... | Shortwave | |||