Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, tried to BS us all
again when he wrote:

On Feb 20, 11:43 am, dxAce wrote:

Yeah, a person such as yourself certainly doesn't want inquiries to be made as
to whether you have a PhD or not, right, PhDufus?


Duh... you've checked extensively on this (with both my employers and
my graduate school!) and I've made the answer as clear as language
allows. Though I have completed all the coursework on my doctorate, I
have not received the degree. The four colleges I've taught at have
not required me to have a doctorate. I have never acquired a job based
on having a doctorate. It has never been a factor in me being hired to
teach. The only person that seems to make any significance out of the
fact is YOU, because you seem to think it matters. It allows you to
attempt to deflect from the obvious fact that you are a sad, old man,
with very little in his life.

If it was of no significance, then why did you make the claim of having a PhD, when
you did not, PhDufus?

dxAce
Michigan
USA

And, as always, don't let your children attend Louisville Technical Institute.
They've hired at least one dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, and who knows,
there may be more.

On Feb 20, 10:00*am, dxAce wrote:
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, tried to BS us all


So when do you expect to make it out of the sixth grade

cmdr buzz corey wrote:

On Feb 20, 10:00 am, dxAce wrote:
Michael W. Bryant, the dufus who once claimed to have a PhD, tried to BS us all

So when do you expect to make it out of the sixth grade

Long before Michael W. Bryant gets his PhD.

Terrorist Prediction.
www.usvetdsp.com
cuhulin

States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin

In article ,
says...
States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin



ROTFL! Holy ****, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
that nonsense seriously?


--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin



ROTFL! Holy ****, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
that nonsense seriously?


I love these in particular:

"Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of
his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the
time."

This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering' citizenship by
birth. If the mother had a child at age 12, that child would still have
confered on them the citizenship of the mother.

"The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens
from qualifying as natural born."

More BS. If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would not have
been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a British citizen by
birth.

In article ,
says...

"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin



ROTFL! Holy ****, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
that nonsense seriously?


I love these in particular:

"Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of
his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the
time."

This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering' citizenship by
birth. If the mother had a child at age 12, that child would still have
confered on them the citizenship of the mother.

"The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens
from qualifying as natural born."

More BS. If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would not have
been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a British citizen by
birth.






Kooktards have an unending supply of kooktardic...um, thinking. Talk
about desperate losers.
--
BDK

BDK Klan leader?
kOOk Magnet!
NJJ CLUB #1
Shillmaster

In article ,
"Brenda Ann" wrote:

"BDK" wrote in message
...
In article ,
says...
States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin



ROTFL! Holy ****, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
that nonsense seriously?


I love these in particular:

"Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the
time of his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the
law at the time."

This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering'
citizenship by birth. If the mother had a child at age 12, that
child would still have confered on them the citizenship of the
mother.

"The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual
citizens from qualifying as natural born."

More BS. If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would
not have been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a
British citizen by birth.

That's not BS. You have to renounce your foreign citizenship and swear
an oath to the USA. The framers were not longer British subjects by the
time the Constitution was signed. Now think about what you wrote and
the consequences just a bit more for the framers at the time.

I would double consider any post I would make that agrees with the news
group Kookaburra.

I'll also remind you that everyone is not equal under the law in the
USA. Foreigners do not have the same rights. Citizens of the USA do not
have the same rights in other countries. Immigration, citizenship,
visas and the like area of laws are written solely for the purposes of
discrimination and you are considered guilty and must prove your
worthiness to enter or become a citizen of the USA.

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

On Feb 21, 12:20*am, "Brenda Ann" wrote:
"BDK" wrote in message

...

In article ,
says...
States reviewing 'eligibility' Challenges--Oklahoma's gets committee
approval.

http://www.libertypost.org/cgi-bin/r...?ArtNum=256526
cuhulin

ROTFL! Holy ****, what do you have to be taking/drinking/huffing to take
that nonsense seriously?

I love these in particular:

"Obama's American mother, the suits contend, was too young at the time of
his birth to confer American citizenship to her son under the law at the
time."

This of course is BS. There is no age involved in 'confering' citizenship by
birth. *If the mother had a child at age 12, that child would still have
confered on them the citizenship of the mother.

"The cases contend the framers of the Constitution excluded dual citizens
from qualifying as natural born."

More BS. *If this were remotely true, the framers themselves would not have
been eligible to hold the office, since each was also a British citizen by
birth.

Yet it has never been proven that Hussein Obama is a natural born
citizen of the United States.