Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 11, 8:59�pm, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message ... On Jul 11, 12:42 am, "David Eduardo" wrote: And, interestingly, Booble has not corrected this lie on his annoying blog. Some misinformation that was passed around �- this misinformation was retracted immediately. I saw no retraction here or in other news groups. The 2008 bankruptcy named iBiquty as the employer of an individual who could not pay a loan. Nowere is there any confusion about this, but you chose to say that iBiquity was bankrupt, based on zero evidence. I saw you searching on Google for the case number, hitting on AVS and my blog. Yes, I was curious to find where else you had posted the defamatory material. It was taken off immediately. Yes, about 30 hours after posting and not until I posted the real facts, not your made-up ones. In this case, you could not get away with anything else. I saw that you contacted Hispanic Broadcasting and they did the same search, as you. Another lie. "Hispanic Broadcasting" has not existed for 5 years, as it merged with Univision and became Univision Radio. So "Hispanic Broadcasting" could not have done a search this week as Hispanic Broadcasting does not exist any more. You sure didn't waste time in panic-mode searching the Internet, looking where it was posted (I've seen you do this more than once through my Google Analytics - I have your Internet location/ connection/name memorized). No, you don't. I have 7 different connections, two wireless and 5 fixed at 4 different geographical locations and you have no clue what most are. I cannot afford �to post disinformation, as it would discredit my blog, and cause legal problems. You are a nuisance, and you post lies until somebody points them out. Then you try to obfuscate, like now. There was never any doubt about the issue at hand. You took the reference to iBiquity and made an untruth about it. I am religous about posting only accurate information. Yeah, and frogs dance flamenco. I know that you all are just chomping at the bit to have a reason to take down my blog Frankly, I don't give a damn. You can rant till you are blue in the face, nobody in radio really cares. But occasionally, when your lies are so egregious as in this case, it gives satisfaction to prove what we all already know you are. 1. america online inc 13 2.77 00:13:34 53.85% 38.46% 2. america online inc. 6 7.17 00:33:39 33.33% 33.33% 3. comcast cable communications inc. 6 1.17 00:00:06 83.33% 83.33% 4. verizon internet services inc. 4 1.25 00:00:07 75.00% 75.00% 5. comcast cable communications holdings inc 3 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 6. road runner holdco llc 2 2.00 00:00:24 50.00% 50.00% 7. xerox corporation 2 1.50 00:01:32 0.00% 50.00% 8. adsl pool - bras12 lsanca.1158482 1 3.00 00:02:19 100.00% 0.00% 9. at&t internet services 1 3.00 00:02:53 100.00% 0.00% 10. california state university at fresno 1 3.00 00:00:28 100.00% 0.00% 11. calweb internet services davis pop 1 2.00 00:00:50 100.00% 0.00% 12. comcast business communications inc. 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 13. cox communications 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 14. earthlink inc 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 15. earthlink inc. 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 16. family dollar inc. 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 17. fibernet communication 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 18. hispanic broadcasting 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 19. jazztel triple play services 1 1.00 00:00:00 0.00% 100.00% 20. k y f m stereo 100-051216011137 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 21. kelsey-seybold clinic 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 22. labyrinth solutions 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 23. ntl internet 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 24. pppox pool - rback15.pltn13-1154359569 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 25. pppox pool se12.chcgil 121007 0951 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 26. pppox pools - bras12 pltn13 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 27. sprint 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 28. stanley associates 1 2.00 00:00:26 100.00% 0.00% 29. us dept of justice 1 3.00 00:04:03 100.00% 0.00% 1. hd radio 10 1.40 00:00:10 100.00% 70.00% 2. hd radios 2 2.00 00:01:27 100.00% 50.00% 3. 070200012572008 ibiquity digital co glen burnie district court 1 7.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 4. 070200012572008 ibiquity digital co other glen burnie district court bankruptcy 1 9.00 00:00:00 100.00% 5. 630 wmal on ipod touch 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 6. antenna automobile hd radio portable 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 7. hd radio any good 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 8. hd radio power increase 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 9. hd radios.org 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% 10. hd-radios 1 1.00 00:00:00 100.00% 100.00% The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic Broadcasting is #18. Notice hit #29 from the DOJ. The second section are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4. This was run on Friday. LOL! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Booble" wrote in message ... The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic Broadcasting is #18. Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago. Notice hit #29 from the DOJ. Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do not peruse those sites. The second section are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4. Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless cards, are personal accounts. I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a company that has not existed for nearly 6 years. This was run on Friday. LOL! I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to believe your own fabrications. You're a kick to spar with. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 12:57�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message ... The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic Broadcasting is #18. Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago. Notice hit #29 from the DOJ. Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do not peruse those sites. The second section are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4. Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless cards, are personal accounts. I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a company that has not existed for nearly 6 years. This was run on Friday. LOL! I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to believe your own fabrications. You're a kick to spar with. "The Real Story" "What many forget is that using this much bandwidth has always been permitted within the defined AM channel bandpass of FCC Rules and NRSC mask limits. Ibiquity is very much aware that the digital sidebands contain higher average energy than analog splatter and can become significant interference. Accordingly, it's been proposing more restrictive specifications for the HD Radio transmissions mask that afford much more protection for third adjacent channel stations than currently required under FCC Rule 73.44." http://www.radioworld.com/section/section/article/1842 And, that iBiquity took advantage of the loophole in FCC Rule 73.44, in order to jam adjacents off the dial? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Booble" wrote in message ... And, that iBiquity took advantage of the loophole in FCC Rule 73.44, in order to jam adjacents off the dial? They could "jam" AMs in the same market, and it would not make a difference. AM is dead. The leading authority on stations, valuations and facilities lists 1761 AMs in the top 100 markets. Of these, 208 are listed as "viable" meaning they have adequate signal day and night to compete. That means there are an average of 2 decent AMs per market in the top 100 cities of the US... while there are an average of 11 viable FMs per market. And that is why today's only broadly successful formats on AM, talk and sports, are migrating in nearly every market to FM. The Koreans could jam the entire band and 95% of the radio listeners under 50 would never notice. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 12:57�am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message ... The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic Broadcasting is #18. Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago. Notice hit #29 from the DOJ. Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do not peruse those sites. The second section are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4. Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless cards, are personal accounts. I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a company that has not existed for nearly 6 years. This was run on Friday. LOL! I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to believe your own fabrications. You're a kick to spar with. "Broadcasters lose in court over low-power FM radio" "An appeals court has rebuked a bid to stop the FCC from protecting Low Power FM stations from big station signal interference. The next step is getting Congress to green light an expansion of the service... There could be a lot more of these stations on the FM dial, but when the FCC first authorized the service in 2000, the NAB and National Public Radio claimed that they would interfere with full-power signals, and got Congress to force a 'third adjacent rule' on the service. No LPFMs could be licensed within three channels to the left or right of a big signal station, for the most part limiting the concept to less urbanized areas... But whatever happens, Friday's court decision is clearly part of a momentum building towards an expanded LPFM service. Ars asked the NAB for a comment on the ruling. We received no reply." http://tinyurl.com/pvrznw Too bad, you "Big Boys" failed to stop the FCC from protecting LPFM - how interesting, this happened right before the FCC will approve the FM-HD power increase. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Jul 12, 12:57*am, "David Eduardo" wrote:
"Booble" wrote in message ... The first section are the network locations, where Hispanic Broadcasting is #18. Which is amusing, as there is no such thing as Hispanic Broadcasting. It ceased to exist on September 29, 2003. That is nearly 6 years ago. Notice hit #29 from the DOJ. Don't you consider that people search for things and get mismatches, or check a result and find it has no bearing? 90% of the searches I do don't find the exact data I want. Yet I hit a lot of sites in the process, but do not peruse those sites. The second section are the keyword searches for you and Hispanic Broadcasting #3 and #4. Funny, because I don't access the Internet ever from a "work" company-owend machine... all of my connections, whether one of my 4 DSLs or 2 wireless cards, are personal accounts. I suspect you did not run any report or analysis, as you are finding a company that has not existed for nearly 6 years. This was run on Friday. LOL! I think the word is "runs" which is what you will get if you start to believe your own fabrications. You're a kick to spar with. "The Wonderful World of HD Radio" "Perhaps it is because it is the American Public that has been paying a large portion of the development costs for HD radio? Yup, that is you and I. An FCC filing from North Carolina’s Public Radio Stations cites: Just a few weeks ago, the House Appropriations Committee approved an additional $40 million to assist public radio stations’ transition to HD radio technology.” http://tinyurl.com/57ksx6 "DEAD AIR: Radio's great leap forward stalling in the Valley" "KMBH, the National Public Radio affiliate based in Harlingen, switched to HD this year, but the change did not boost its inconsistent analog signal in the upper Valley. Monsignor Pedro Briseño, the manager of the station and its television affiliate, did not return multiple calls and an e-mail requesting comment on the station’s shift. A fundraising campaign on the station asked local listeners to contribute to the upgrade earlier this year, touting the change as a service to listeners that would improve their experience. The station’s business manager said she could not reveal the cost of the upgrade, saying all media requests have to be routed to Briseño. A public information request faxed to the station Monday evening has not yet received a response. Organizations that receive government funding are subject to state and federal open records laws, but have seven business days to respond to information requests." http://tinyurl.com/6gwdj4 The NPR is the biggest fraudster of all of you. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
(OT) Breaking News! | Shortwave | |||
IBIQUITY TROLLS FOR VOLUNTEER POLICE FORCE - LMFAO! | Shortwave | |||
Ford, an investor in iBiquity, slams HD Radio! LMFAO!!! | Shortwave | |||
BREAKING NEWS: Hamvention=AE Names 2008 Award Winners | Info | |||
Breaking HD News!!! | Shortwave |