|
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 11, 7:34*pm, Peter wrote:
On 2010-08-11 17:24:52 -0700, "Brenda Ann" said: Also, think about this: even the ones using faked SSN's are paying into Social Security. Those payments will not go to the person illegally using that SSN, but to the person who actually owns the SSN. If nobody owns the SSN, then the payments just go into the general fund to be distributed later. The benefits go into a suspense account where the money is immediately used up anyway. So, a real or a faked SSN/TIN doesn't matter as the receipts will be spent on those who have a valid number and who file for benefits. I am reminded that when I applied for early SS, do to a marked decline in my investment portfolio income, I was supposedly required to supply an official copy of my Certificate of Live Birth. I actually DID obtain such a certificate from the State of Ohio, but when I called the local SS office to for instructions, the official said my COLB was NOT required as they had already verified it from other sources. Perhaps from my U.S. Passport data? I HAD to provide a certified copy of my COLB to obtain my first passport, but not on subsequent passport applications. - Incidentally, for those so-called "birthers" out there ... both - California and Ohio COLBs are facsimiles of the actual original - document, signed by the attending physician, but printed by - photographic means (Ohio) or xerographic means (California) on special - paper which is virtually impossible to counterfeit. Imbedded silk - threads, multi-color printing (intaglio in CA's case) and - micro-printing. The whole nine-yards. Also a raised seal of the state, - over the signature of the official who issued it ... an MD-MPH in CA's - case. As 'Easy" as Printing Magic NAFTA Money . . . http://michellemalkin.cachefly.net/m...cerodinero.jpg |
HD Immigration
John Higdon wrote:
If illegal immigration were such a big problem, the federal government would have stopped it during any Republican or Democratic regime since the 1940s when it first rose to public attention. Hmm...the same thing could be said about Global Warming (tm). All we do is talk about both issues and do absolutely nothing that has any glimmer of effectiveness. Immigration is a non-issue. It is a distraction to keep us from thinking about global warming. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
John Higdon wrote:
In , (David Kaye) wrote: They make one up. The SSA matches SSNs with names at the end of the year to determine if the money is flagged for the legitimate SSN holder or goes into their general fund. It is rather difficult to "make up" and SSN. Like credit card numbers, they have checksums. A bogus SSN will drop a flag the moment it enters an SSN-savy computer. http://www.socialsecurity.gov/employ...vhighgroup.htm Luckily, the brown hordes can't read English |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
RHF wrote:
On Aug 11, 10:30 pm, (David Kaye) wrote: wrote: Automatic F due to using Wikipedia as a reference. - The entry is referenced. I have no problem using referenced Wikipedia - entries. A study confirmed that Wikipedia is not substantially more error - prone than the Encyclopedia Britannica. David Kaye ? Encyclopedia Britannica ? Citing a British 'Source' to an American is... is . . . Revolution a r y ~ RHF . Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. Type Private Genre Reference material Founded Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (1768 (1768)) Founder(s) Colin Macfarquhar Andrew Bell Headquarters Chicago, Illinois, U.S. Products Encyclopędia Britannica, Britannica Online, Merriam-Webster products Revenue Not reported Owner(s) Jacqui Safra (principal owner) Employees About 400 (300 in Chicago, 100 worldwide)[1] Website www.britannica.com Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. is an American company best known for publishing the Encyclopędia Britannica, the world's oldest continuously-published encyclopaedia |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 12, 6:21*am, dave wrote:
RHF wrote: On Aug 11, 10:30 pm, (David Kaye) wrote: *wrote: Automatic F due to using Wikipedia as a reference. - The entry is referenced. *I have no problem using referenced Wikipedia - entries. *A study confirmed that Wikipedia is not substantially more error - prone than the Encyclopedia Britannica. David Kaye ? Encyclopedia Britannica ? Citing a British 'Source' to an American is... is . . . Revolution a r y ~ RHF * . Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. *From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Jump to: navigation, search Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. Type * * Private Genre * Reference material Founded * * * * Edinburgh, Scotland, UK (1768 (1768)) Founder(s) * * *Colin Macfarquhar Andrew Bell Headquarters * *Chicago, Illinois, U.S. Products * * * *Encyclopędia Britannica, Britannica Online, Merriam-Webster products Revenue * * * * Not reported Owner(s) * * * *Jacqui Safra (principal owner) Employees * * * About 400 (300 in Chicago, 100 worldwide)[1] Website * * * *www.britannica.com Encyclopędia Britannica, Inc. is an American company best known for publishing the Encyclopędia Britannica, the world's oldest continuously-published encyclopaedia Britannica is Britannica is Britannica and Britannica ain't American [.] Channeling the spirit of : Ivan Ivanovich Nicholai Nikolaivich Putily Vasily Kuropatkin du la Chappelle |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On 08/12/2010 12:39 AM, John Higdon wrote:
It is rather difficult to "make up" and SSN. Like credit card numbers, they have checksums. A bogus SSN will drop a flag the moment it enters an SSN-savy computer. *BZZZRRRTTT* http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/248 SSNs have no checksums or check digits whatsoever. Thank you for playing; the exit is - that way. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 11, 6:14*am, RHF wrote:
On Aug 11, 5:39*am, (David Kaye) wrote: - - RHF wrote: - - Maybe around 25% of the people in the SF Bay - - Area that I retired with in the late 1990s are now - - 'former' Californians. - Don't let the door slam on your way out. *I'd be very happy if more retirees - left California, for several reasons: *(1) fewer people means less congestion - on the roads, on public transit, and in line at Safeway; (2) fewer people - means less wear and tear on the infrastructure, (3) fewer retired people means - more working people and a big savings in Medi-Cal payouts. * - - In short, everybody wins! NO - More Current Documented US Citizen California Tax Payers leave . . . -and- More Un-Documented {Non-Tax-Paying} Illegal Aliens come and the ever increasing Tax Burden on the fewer remaining US Citizen Tax Payers increases . . . All workers pay into Social Security, but illegals can't collect it. Thank the next illegal worker you see, for helping reduce the SS deficit. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
In article ,
Don Piven wrote: On 08/12/2010 12:39 AM, John Higdon wrote: It is rather difficult to "make up" and SSN. Like credit card numbers, they have checksums. A bogus SSN will drop a flag the moment it enters an SSN-savy computer. *BZZZRRRTTT* http://ssa-custhelp.ssa.gov/app/answers/detail/a_id/248 SSNs have no checksums or check digits whatsoever. Thank you for playing; the exit is - that way. Of course they have no checksums. I'm surprised so many people did not catch the non-literal use of the term. They do have formats and you are tempting fate to just pull a number out of your ass. -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
In article
, spamtrap1888 wrote: All workers pay into Social Security, but illegals can't collect it. Thank the next illegal worker you see, for helping reduce the SS deficit. Unfortunately, none of that money filters down to the communities whose services they use. -- John Higdon +1 408 ANdrews 6-4400 AT&T-Free At Last |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
John Higdon wrote:
Of course they have no checksums. I'm surprised so many people did not catch the non-literal use of the term. They do have formats and you are tempting fate to just pull a number out of your ass. You did say "checksum", a word that has a particular meaning, especially to techies like us. You're just plain wrong and you don't want to admit it. Just say you're wrong, okay? |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:43 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com