![]() |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 6, 5:15*pm, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: "David Kaye" wrote in message ... He cares about ratings, which are made of whole cloth and based upon a model that is non-sequitur in the real world.. We've all seen what the true meaning of polls is during the past four election cycles. There's just no way you can legitimately, despite what some would have you believe, base the opinions of 1,000,000 people on the dubious reporting of a few hundred or so. Elections can be won with a single vote. In ratings, averages are what allow advertisers to attach value to campaigns. It is, in fact, the larger advertisers who demand ratings and do not make decisions without some form of quantitative analysis. In recent years, advertisers have their agency ad buys audited to make sure that there is measurable efficiency in them. The industry, and he in particular, choose to dismiss the opinions, tastes, and needs of a significant segment of the population (and getting MORE significant over the next 20 years or so) with the totally inapt reasoning that they "don't contribute significantly to sales figures" and "are not swayed to try new products", both of which are patently and demonstrably untrue, if you actually LISTEN to your public rather than to allow yourself to be lead around like an animal at a petting zoo. And you, again, fail to understand that advertisers determine the age groupīs they wish their campigns to reach. If there are essentially no advertisers asking for audiences over the age of 55, then there is no way for commercial radio to serve that group as there is no way to pay the bills. Despite what some have "claimed" radio station sellers have little or no contact with those who make marketing decisions at the client level. Blaming radio for what advertisers choose to do with their money is naive. FWIW, I have a good friend that has known David for many years, and who agrees 100% with my opinions of him. I doubt that, since I have spent most of my career where English is not spoken. In any case, no person in broadcast management is running a popularity contest among their competitors. Being disliked is often a sign that you are winning. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 6, 5:45*pm, (David Kaye) wrote:
Thus, I'd be inclined to think the ratings systems aren't as flawed as people contend they are. * An old friend at Arbitron once said, "There are three kinds of clients. Those who just went up in the ratings think they are programming geniuses to have done that. THose that stayed the same are thankful they did not go down, and are pleased with their programming and management skills. And then there are those who went down, who know it is all because Arbitron surveys are defective." |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 6, 7:52*pm, wrote:
Po, po auld henpecked Eduardo.Y'all oughts not be pickin on him when he isn't here to defend himself. cuhulin Heeee's baaaaack!!!!! |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 6, 10:52*am, DigitalRadioScams
wrote: From Radio-Info: July 2005 July 2005 is relevant? Have I fallen into a time warp? Well, I'll play along: Say, who do you think will replace Sandra Day O'Connor? And do you think the Dems have a shot at retaking Congress next fall? |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 6, 11:22*pm, "
wrote: On Aug 6, 5:45*pm, (David Kaye) wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote: While I may not have some of the expertise he claims to have, [....] It's not a matter of "claims." *He's known in the industry and he has a website detailing all his accomplishments over the years, complete with photos and other documents. * He cares about ratings, which are made of whole cloth and based upon a model that is non-sequitur in the real world. Huh? *Without ratings it's very hard to make income. *Sure, it's possible to sell time on stations with no ratings, but it's extremely difficult. *Stations such as KEST and KPIG(AM) do it, but they have a tough go of it. *KPIG(AM) is advertising for salespeople every couple months because it's so hard to keep salespeople who can't make any money selling time. * Regardless of whether you think the ratings system is flawed or not, the PPMs and the diaries of Arbitron are fairly close for the most part, and the differences between Neilsen and Arbitron ratings aren't much different, either. *Thus, I'd be inclined to think the ratings systems aren't as flawed as people contend they are. * We've all seen what the true meaning of polls is during the past four election cycles. There's just no way you can legitimately, despite what some would have you believe, base the opinions of 1,000,000 people on the dubious reporting of a few hundred or so. None of this matters in radio and TV ratings. *The ratings come in and the stations sell based on those ratings. *The advertisers buy based on the assumption that they are correct. *If they're so far off as to be bogus, the advertisers would have left long ago and the ratings systems would have been thrown out. *Companies do not spend money capriciously, especially they're trying to bring in business. * I agree Eduardo is pretty sharp, but let me try to explain Brenda's point, or perhaps put my spin on it. There are two ways to market a product. One is to do research, focus groups, etc. This produces a product that the market probably wants to some degree, but also a product for which the market is familiar. Now the way to make a killing is to come up with a product that the customer doesn't know he needs. You understand the product, not the market per se because the market isn't built yet. Basically if you focus on surveys, you can only provide something that the customer already knows about. You probably won't screw up, but you won't make a killing either. The purpose of focus groups is to try out on real people things for which there is no current market. You get a cross-section of humanity in a room and expose them to your new product. Eduardo has no passion for radio. He surveys the market and tries to adjust stations to meet what his survey indicates is marketable. Like Piolin en la Manana? |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 7, 7:20*pm, "Brenda Ann"
wrote: Reality has changed, the radio industry is not changing with it. The people with the most disposable income are all over 50 (boomers), and, at least until this recent downturn, which has affected ALL sales, they spent quite a lot of it. I myself am always buying new tech, and I still try new fast foods when they come out, ad inf.. Boomers are a huge market that is being largely ignored. Again, it's the advertisers who don't want to pay to have their messages heard by people over 55 or so. Over and over and over the reason is that the cost of making a sale with an older, more skeptical consumer, is greater than the profit on the sale because it takes many more repetitons of the ad message to create a sale. In other words, there is no return on investment. Radio has as high a usage by those over 55 as in any of the so-called sales demographics between 18 and 54. There are plenty of stations and formats that appeal to seniors, including AC, country, news, talk, etc., but they don't get much revenue from that and can't effectively use audience ratings as nobody is buying. Ratings are bogus. I, and most people, really don't care to have my decisions on what to listen to or watch or whatever decided by a small sample pool. Imagine if 2500 especially picked individuals decided who would be POTUS? Two little differences (although for someone who has made their mind up already, this won't make any difference): First, a presidential election is one time every four years. Radio ratings are for every moment, hour by hour, every day, every week, every month. And a reasonable approximation of audience size is adequate for pricing, the whole purpose of ratings where there are many, many winners. Second, the samples are not 2,500 but hundreds of thousands. Just in Los Angeles, the daily sample is around 3,000. That's 1,000,000 daily listening samples a year. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 8, 1:26*pm, "
wrote: On Aug 7, 7:13*pm, (David Kaye) wrote: RHF wrote: Yes - I have been Packaged and am Ready for Delivery -but- according to D'Eduardo : I Don't Count ~ RHF Well, you may not count. *People over age 50 don't count to most advertisers, thus most of the KGO listenership is a group few companies want to reach. * That's because people over 50 don't buy much, and those who do tend not to be swayed much by advertising. * That's just the reality of the ratings game. I believe you have it half right. People over 50 spend plenty of money, but their purchasing habits are well established. You can't make them change brands. So the theory is you indoctrinate the younguns and they will buy your crap for life. Apple is a prime example. The young liked the ipod, so they think Apple makes good phones too. True. An old fuddy-duddy like Obama was still wedded to his BlackBerry. The reality is that people change because products change and suppliers go out of business. If brand names continue to exist, they are names only. I admit my mother in law finds it hard to use her DVD player, but she's over 90, and she's used to playing tapes over Ch. 3. I've said this before -- my uncle was 65 when he dropped his lifetime habit of buying Chryslers for a Toyota. He was the first guy on his block to get color TV, and had he lived long enough I'm sure he'd be the first one with a plasma widescreen. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 8, 3:18*pm, RHF wrote:
- I believe you have it half right. People over 50 spend plenty of - money, but their purchasing habits are well established. You can't - make them change brands. So the theory is you indoctrinate the - younguns and they will buy your crap for life. Apple is a prime - example. The young liked the ipod, so they think Apple makes good - phones too. Advertising & Marketing & Brand Loyalty : Happy Meals = Develop Customer Brand Loyalty at an early age; and continue to build on it until they are hooked for life {around Age 50} ~ RHF *. True, I'm still eating Spaghetti-O's and Cap'n Crunch cereal. |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 8, 10:26*am, John Higdon wrote:
In article , *RHF wrote: Maybe in this here Recession the Radio Advertisers should re-think their Prime Demographics and try and Target those still with Money in this Multi-Year [Great Obama] Recession (2009~2016). You must be joking. Thinking out of the box is not practiced in corporate radio. Of course, the demographics of radio advertising are determined by advertisers, not stations. But why let facts get in the way of another remark about evil station owners... |
HD Radio: Eduardo contradicts himself - LMFAO!
On Aug 9, 9:34*pm, spamtrap1888 wrote:
On Aug 6, 11:22*pm, " wrote: On Aug 6, 5:45*pm, (David Kaye) wrote: "Brenda Ann" wrote: While I may not have some of the expertise he claims to have, [....] It's not a matter of "claims." *He's known in the industry and he has a website detailing all his accomplishments over the years, complete with photos and other documents. * He cares about ratings, which are made of whole cloth and based upon a model that is non-sequitur in the real world. Huh? *Without ratings it's very hard to make income. *Sure, it's possible to sell time on stations with no ratings, but it's extremely difficult. *Stations such as KEST and KPIG(AM) do it, but they have a tough go of it. *KPIG(AM) is advertising for salespeople every couple months because it's so hard to keep salespeople who can't make any money selling time. * Regardless of whether you think the ratings system is flawed or not, the PPMs and the diaries of Arbitron are fairly close for the most part, and the differences between Neilsen and Arbitron ratings aren't much different, either. *Thus, I'd be inclined to think the ratings systems aren't as flawed as people contend they are. * We've all seen what the true meaning of polls is during the past four election cycles. There's just no way you can legitimately, despite what some would have you believe, base the opinions of 1,000,000 people on the dubious reporting of a few hundred or so. None of this matters in radio and TV ratings. *The ratings come in and the stations sell based on those ratings. *The advertisers buy based on the assumption that they are correct. *If they're so far off as to be bogus, the advertisers would have left long ago and the ratings systems would have been thrown out. *Companies do not spend money capriciously, especially they're trying to bring in business. * I agree Eduardo is pretty sharp, but let me try to explain Brenda's point, or perhaps put my spin on it. There are two ways to market a product. One is to do research, focus groups, etc. This produces a product that the market probably wants to some degree, but also a product for which the market is familiar. Now the way to make a killing is to come up with a product that the customer doesn't know he needs. You understand the product, not the market per se because the market isn't built yet. Basically if you focus on surveys, you can only provide something that the customer already knows about. You probably won't screw up, but you won't make a killing either. The purpose of focus groups is to try out on real people things for which there is no current market. You get a cross-section of humanity in a room and expose them to your new product. Eduardo has no passion for radio. He surveys the market and tries to adjust stations to meet what his survey indicates is marketable. Like Piolin en la Manana?- Hide quoted text - Yeah, the guy who I put on overnights for me at a suburban LA station when I first met him in 1992. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:38 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com