On Feb 22, 5:17 am, dave wrote:

- - On 02/21/2011 05:57 PM, RHF wrote:
- - The Obama {Elitist} Health Care Directive : Kill-Off The
- - Old To Cut the High Cost of Keeping Them Alive :
- - Pay More Taxes and More Premiums and More Fees
- - -and- Get Less Care and Less Treatment and Less Help
- - -cause- Your Death Can Be A Blessing To Society

- You are an embarrassment. Our current health care system kills
50,000
- people a year. Minimum. And those are just the ones that never see
the
- inside of a doctor's office until it's too late.
-
- You support doctors gaming the system while denying people care, so
that
- only the most profitable medicine is practiced? You think people
should
- get rich from other people getting sick? No moral issues there?

'Special-Dave' and just how many will be . . .
"Sentenced-to-Death" Daily, Weekly, Monthly,
Yearly By The Obama-Care© 'Death Panels' ? ? ?

Using Abortions* as an American (USA) Societal Index
{Benchmark} with around Two (2) Million a Year : We
Can Expect That : Around 380 Thousand Americans
per Year will be Killed-Off by the Obama-Care© 'Death
Panels'. -based-on- The Number of Baby-Boomers
Coming To The Last Years of Their Lives -wrt- The
76 Million over 20 Years = 3.8 Million per Year Facing
the Last Year with 1-in-10 {10%} being Processed by
the Obama-Care© 'Death Panels' ! ! ! -and- Being Given
a Death Sentence versus Medical Treatment : That's
380 Thousand {380, 000} Americans per Year for the
Next 20-Years
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baby_boomer

! THAT'S MASSIVE EUTHANASIA ON A NATIONAL SCALE !
{Execution-By-Neglect & Death-by-Denial-of-Medical-Treatment}
Potentially 380 Thousand per Year {Death by Obama-Care©}
-and- Over 30 Thousand per Month {Death by Obama-Care©}
-around- One Thousand per Day {Death by Obama-Care©}

On Feb 22, 5:45*am, dave wrote:
On 02/22/2011 05:38 AM, Drooling Idiot wrote:

*wrote:
You support doctors gaming the system while denying people care, so that
only the most profitable medicine is practiced? You think people should
get rich from other people getting sick? No moral issues there?

Lets not forget that when George "the Greatest Prez Ever" Bush was Governor
of Texas he signed the "Texas Advanced Directives Law" that brought the
life of Sun Hudson to an end after 6-months, because it wasn't
"economically feasible" to continue his respirator. *MORE evidence that
rightards who love fetuses couldn't give a **** about them once they are
born.

The righties give themselves away when they accuse their opposition of
doing weird off the wall stuff. They are "turning things around" they
call it. Just lie and say the other guy is doing what you're actually
guilty of.

If they talk "death panels" it's because they do "death panels".

- Luckily the people are waking up.
- Fascists always lose once the people wake up.

The People -aka- American Voters Are Waking-Up To :

The-Mark-of-the-Obama© = $6.66 Gasoline :
Crashing The US Economy
-wrt-
Ending Your Life =for= The Good of Society
-wrt- Free Obama-Care© 'Death Panel' Counseling
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...74434a4633e379

On Feb 21, 5:03*pm, dave wrote:
On 02/21/2011 10:12 AM, dxAce wrote:



Steve, from your posts here, you appear to be just a little guy, not a
wealthy individual. Why are you so hell-bent on giving away the store to
Big Business?

- - Why are YOU so hell-bent on giving away
- - the store to Big Government?

- The only way the little guy has a chance against
- big business is to have a powerful government
- keeping big business in line. Otherwise you have
- people like BP and Goldman Sachs pushing
- everybody around.

? And Just Who Protects You {The Citizen} From
That Big and Very "Powerful" Government ?

The-Mark-of-the-Obama© = $6.66 Gasoline :
Crashing The US Economy
http://groups.google.com/group/rec.r...3b2069c1ce8f8a

"RHF" wrote in message
...

...

The People -aka- American Voters Are Waking-Up To :

The-Mark-of-the-Obama© = $6.66 Gasoline :
Crashing The US Economy..

Idiot.

Joe from Kokomo wrote:



Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 2/22/2011 5:10 PM, dxAce wrote:

Sorry, Dave is incorrect. You need to get your information somewhere other than
your DNC handlers.

And YOU need to get your information from somewhere other than Rush
'Oxycontin' Limpballs, the Nazi gas bag that gets paid $50 million
dollars to shill for Big Business. ;-)

C'mon Steve, you're just a little working class guy like the rest of us.
Why are you getting in bed with the greedy rich *******s?

On 2/22/2011 8:01 PM, dxAce wrote:

Why are you getting in bed with the Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialsts?

And who are the greedy rich *******s? Those who make and sell products and/or
services that you can decline to purchase by personal choice, or, those who will
steal your money via taxation, and, if you refuse to pay can come and confiscate your
worldly possessions by way of force/law?

Have you ever heard of the phrase "checks and balances"?

Do your homework, review the auto companies of the 1930s, before the
unions came into being. There was a very good reason why the unions were
needed, namely Capital's rampant abuse of Labor.

Unions have had their share of excesses, as has Big Business (witness
the current Great Recession, courtesy of Big Business greed). You NEED
checks and balances. If the Repubs get their way and make the unions
disappear, there will be no protection for labor, nothing, NOTHING to
balance runaway greed.

It's that simple -- unions, even with their imperfections, are needed to
balance the greed of Capital. Again, do your homework and find out about
all the abuses that took place before unions.

Finally, you complain about "those who will steal your money via
taxation". What are you saying? That you don't want taxes at all? That
you only want some taxes? How much is too much? I don't know about you,
but I -like- our libraries, paved roads, traffic lights, police and fire
departments, all paid for by taxes. I presume your disability benefits
are helpful to you. You can be against taxes, but make sure you don't
shoot yourself in the foot.

You really need to get out more! And, you really need to stop siding with the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists.

On Feb 22, 11:28*am, Joe from Kokomo wrote:
On 2/22/11 07:55 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 2/21/11 15:11 , Joe from Kokomo wrote:

On 2/22/2011 2:41 AM, D Peter Maus wrote:

{stipulated}...

Just out of idle curiosity, what kind of antenna system do you use?

Just an idle answer...

I have a 130 foot long, 25-30 foot high, bent dipole between two
trees, fed with ladder line, used on 80-10 (including WARC bands)
with a Johnson KW Matchbox balanced tuner. On 160 meters, I
reconfigure the antenna to what is essentially a top loaded
vertical, using a T-match tuner.

Obviously not as good as a tower and beam, but I work lots o' DX
with it, for example the VK0IR (Heard Island) dx'pedition and North
Korea. (If you are not a ham, trust me, these are nice catches).
Needless to say, it also works nicely for SWL'ing with my vintage
receivers.

A tower would be nice, but not worth the hassle of dealing with the
(overly) strict city and subdivision restrictions.

On 2/22/2011 9:06 AM, D. Peter Maus wrote:

I was speaking with a ham buddy of mine, over the weekend, and he
recommended such an antenna for low noise and great digging in crowded
bands. And particularly for MW Dx. I'm tempted to do it here.

Well, it won't hurt to try it...

Your buddy says it is a quiet antenna. Compared to what? It is commonly
acknowledged that noise is more vertically polarized and thus a vertical
antenna is a bit noisier than a horizontal antenna like a dipole. I
really don't think the dipole I described is any quieter than any other
dipole AFAIK.

The reason I used the antenna was mostly because of its benefits when
transmitting. With the tuner and the ladder line feed, it will operate
on many bands with relatively low line loss. For SWL'ing, I'm not sure
if it would have any particular benefit.

Which vintage receivers are you using?

I've had many over the years, from an R-390 on down,

- but now that I am at the Gateway to Geezerdom,

You Are : 100 + 10 & 1 ! ;;-}}
-we-should-all-live-so-long-

On 02/23/2011 05:22 AM, dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

On 02/23/2011 01:49 AM, dxAce wrote:



You really need to get out more! And, you really need to stop siding with the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists.



I don't know about the "Marxist" thing, but the People are revolting.

Yeah, back in November we put over 700 folks into positions nationwide which were
formerly held by Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists.



We? Are you a Koch Brother? Are you part of the US Chamber of Commerce?

You had an off-year election with a 19% turnout. Not a license to undo
the New Deal. No mandate.

dave wrote:

On 02/23/2011 05:22 AM, dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

On 02/23/2011 01:49 AM, dxAce wrote:



You really need to get out more! And, you really need to stop siding with the
Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists.



I don't know about the "Marxist" thing, but the People are revolting.

Yeah, back in November we put over 700 folks into positions nationwide which were
formerly held by Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialists.



We?

We The People. Try to pay attention, clown 'tard.

dave wrote:

On 02/23/2011 05:22 AM, dxAce wrote:




And who makes more on a gallon of gasoline than the oil companies do?

Why it's government! Be it local, state or federal, they extract more $$$$'s
out of the consumer in total than those 'greedy capitalists' do.

All that without doing any exploration, drilling, transportation, or refining.


Idiot!

Clown 'tard!

On 02/23/2011 05:31 AM, dxAce wrote:


dave wrote:

On 02/23/2011 02:30 AM, dxAce wrote:

As a former union member, my homework was done a long time ago. I suggest YOU do your
homework regarding this issue vis-a vis Wisconsin. This has nothing to do with private
sector unions, but rather public sector unions.

But in typical Liberal/Democrat/Marxist/Socialist fashion, you have attempted to twist the
issue into something else entirely.

Please, try to pay attention!


Unions are a side issue. This is about Republicans over-reaching,
claiming mandates where none exist, and politically attacking
democratic-leaning institutions for purely political reasons.

Damn! I thought it was about balancing a budget.


You can't steal all the money, then claim a crisis for which the only
cure is to fire everyone. The people see a 14 billion dollar debt and a
17 billion dollar bailout of Wall Street. They see some of the thieves
trying to break up the Unions, and they are ****ed.

You almost got away with it; the people always seem to wake up just in time.

Beware the British East India Company!