On 2011-06-01 22:54, Colanth wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:05:42 -0400, wrote:

On 2011-06-01 13:23, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:39 AM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 11:10, Colanth wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:42:26 -0400, wrote:

On 2011-06-01 00:14, John Smith wrote:

Why the common pubic isn't aware of this is a mystery? But the schools
are at the root of the problem ...

That must be it.

And JFK is still living comfortably on a hidden island somewhere.

With Marilyn and Elvis.

The things "they" keep hidden from the public.

Yeah, I can see you guys seem to keep confusing hollywood with physics
... as shame, really ...

Can't deal with humour, I see. Pity.

With what he's posting we have to either laugh at it or shoot it.

He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?

--
Choose heaven for climate, hell for society. - Mark Twain

On Jun 1, 9:03*pm, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 22:54, Colanth wrote:









On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 14:05:42 -0400, *wrote:

On 2011-06-01 13:23, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:39 AM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-01 11:10, Colanth wrote:
On Wed, 01 Jun 2011 00:42:26 -0400, *wrote:

On 2011-06-01 00:14, John Smith wrote:

Why the common pubic isn't aware of this is a mystery? But the schools
are at the root of the problem ...

That must be it.

And JFK is still living comfortably on a hidden island somewhere.

With Marilyn and Elvis.

The things "they" keep hidden from the public.

Yeah, I can see you guys seem to keep confusing hollywood with physics
... as shame, really ...

Can't deal with humour, I see. Pity.

With what he's posting we have to either laugh at it or shoot it.

He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?

Most K-12s are not wise enough to find or much less utilize Google
Groups or these Usenet/newsgroups. Home schooling (always sequestered
inside a cave) might explain Warhol. John Smith may have skipped a
few grades, but at least his interpretation of nothing seems
reasonable enough.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

Radio Waves are very happy to traverse the Universe.ET Phoned Home.

Above Suspicion movie on the TCM channel right now.I just now figured
out who Joan Crawford looked like, Boris Karloft.
cuhulin

On 6/1/2011 9:03 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?

--
Choose heaven for climate, hell for society. - Mark Twain



Easy, the "internet" was ARPANET and funded by DARPA under the
department of defense when I worked for various contractors and lawrence
livermore labs., back in the late 70s and early 80s.

An interesting historical fact is, the first packets ever to be
exchanged over the ARPANET (later to become "the internet") happened in
late 1969.

It the 1980's it was beginning to be made available to certain uses in
the public sector, and was eventually transferred over into the main
public domain -- most here probably had their first exposure to it
sometime in the 1990s, it they were old enough then and had access to a
computer.

Although the original users of the internet (ARPANET) were government,
government contractors and academic institutions, more data is now
exchanged by these institutions using the net than ever before.

USENET was started up around 1979-80 based on UUCP (UNIX TO UNIX COPY
PROTOCOL) and came out of bell labs, my first exposure/use of it was in
1980.

You only got to use the internet when the people I worked for were
pretty much done with it and wanted it made available to you ... again,
you even have the basic facts of that WRONG! Back then, we didn't allow
people like you access!

I have watched all of this, I can tell you, just like slum neighborhoods
and ghettos are created when you allow certain classes of people to
enter them, so has gone USENET and the internet ...

ROFLOL ... what an idiot!

Regards,
JS

On 2011-06-02 01:50, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:03 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?
net ...

ROFLOL ... what an idiot!

:-D


Regards,
JS

On 6/2/2011 7:49 AM, Olrik wrote:
On 2011-06-02 01:50, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:03 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?
net ...

ROFLOL ... what an idiot!

:-D


Regards,
JS


I can show you how to "see" the ether!

Place a strong magnet under a sheet of paper, now sprinkle iron filings
on top of the sheet of paper. The iron filings will form them selfs
into a pattern showing the lines of magnetic force in the ether ...

These lines of force, OBVIOUSLY, do not have magic "photons" flowing
along them, and, if they are "waves", they are static ones!

The bend of the iron filings DO show the magnetic field AND the warped
ether though which they are conducted ...

Regards,
JS

If iron particles get on a magnet and you want to clean them off, get
some bread and mash the bread around on the magnet real good.

Who says California doesn't get Tornados?

Tornado in Northern California
http://www.rense.com
cuhulin

On 6/2/2011 8:50 AM, wrote:
If iron particles get on a magnet and you want to clean them off, get
some bread and mash the bread around on the magnet real good.

Who says California doesn't get Tornados?

Tornado in Northern California
http://www.rense.com
cuhulin


People further east would call them dust devils, however, THEY ARE
GETTING BIGGER HERE!

Regards,
JS

On Jun 2, 8:40*am, John Smith wrote:
On 6/2/2011 7:49 AM, Olrik wrote:









On 2011-06-02 01:50, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:03 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?
net ...

ROFLOL ... what an idiot!

:-D

Regards,
JS

I can show you how to "see" the ether!

Place a strong magnet under a sheet of paper, now sprinkle iron filings
on top of the sheet of paper. *The iron filings will form them selfs
into a pattern showing the lines of magnetic force in the ether ...

These lines of force, OBVIOUSLY, do not have magic "photons" flowing
along them, and, if they are "waves", they are static ones!

The bend of the iron filings DO show the magnetic field AND the warped
ether though which they are conducted ...

Regards,
JS

I'm not sure that actual lines of magnetic force exist, other than
depicted by those paramagnetic iron filings which tend to create their
own patterns or lines. Moving a magnet (big or little, powerful or
weak) past any sufficiently neutral or nonmagnetic conductor does not
suggest or otherwise indicate a given test magnet or artificial
magnetic field as offering lines of force.

http://www.wanttoknow.info/
http://translate.google.com/#
Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”

On Jun 2, 7:08*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 2, 8:40*am, John Smith wrote:









On 6/2/2011 7:49 AM, Olrik wrote:

On 2011-06-02 01:50, John Smith wrote:
On 6/1/2011 9:03 PM, Olrik wrote:

...
He's a bit less dense than Warhol, but how do these elementary school
failures manage to get access to the internet?
net ...

ROFLOL ... what an idiot!

:-D

Regards,
JS

I can show you how to "see" the ether!

Place a strong magnet under a sheet of paper, now sprinkle iron filings
on top of the sheet of paper. *The iron filings will form them selfs
into a pattern showing the lines of magnetic force in the ether ...

These lines of force, OBVIOUSLY, do not have magic "photons" flowing
along them, and, if they are "waves", they are static ones!

The bend of the iron filings DO show the magnetic field AND the warped
ether though which they are conducted ...

Regards,
JS

I'm not sure that actual lines of magnetic force exist, other than
depicted by those paramagnetic iron filings which tend to create their
own patterns or lines. *Moving a magnet (big or little, powerful or
weak) past any sufficiently neutral or nonmagnetic conductor does not
suggest or otherwise indicate a given test magnet or artificial
magnetic field as offering lines of force.

*http://www.wanttoknow.info/
*http://translate.google.com/#
*Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”


here you are right, BG, it doesn't line up with the magnetic force...
since ether atoms have a mass... Ether must be seen as layers of
oxygen and other gasses... the heavyset atoms are below and the
lightest above... (hydrogen is lightest)... why a balloon can fly very
high until it reach vacuum and there it will remain as positive loaded
atom which shall form a kind of Faraday cage around earth...