|
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing wasFAKE
Potential for Volcanic Activity in Salton Sea.
http://www.standeyo.com Sallton Sea, in Southern (not SoCal, how come they don't use Proper Language over there? They have their own Schtick going on.They say yew for you, tew for two, it's Weird)) California. Let er (Volcano) RIP! cuhulin |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), Brad Guth wrote:
On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. No Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet”, you missed the message completely! The message was... you were asked a question. Sane people, when asked a question, respond with an answer, not an assertion. Please try again. We now know what FUD is. What is ZNR (I seem to remember it's something about Zionists and Nazis)? Who is William Mook? And why should anyone care? Shill #2 -- Ears on the loon go round and round, round and round, round and round... theobviousgcashman |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 11, 10:50*pm, BDK wrote:
In article 1ab09b17-2565-4ed9-ac3b-521ea9d4f735 @q12g2000prb.googlegroups.com, says... Atomic spaceships sounds like one of guballs previous net incarnations That wouldn't surprise me a bit. I wonder if Brad believes in a perpetual motion machine? Don't write off the concept just yet. Perpetual bull**** machines already exist, as exemplified by the bible / koran / other holy book of your choice. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 12, 1:01*pm, Brad Guth wrote:
The folks that I've worked for (including most current clients have often been Jewish and/or otherwise devoutly faith-based because it helps them deal with everyday matters and self improvement issues), IOW, it's a crutch. If you had the balls, you'd tell them. know that I'm outspoken and critical about mainstream religion and politics, Just mainstream? Why not the rest of it? |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 13, 9:42*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09*pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. *When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. *Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. I see that you still quote dead people, perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
|
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 16, 7:19*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 23:26:56 -0400, BDK wrote: In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024 , says... On Jun 16, 8:51 am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 15, 2:06 pm, Government Shill #2 wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote: On Jun 15, 8:42 am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of disqualifying it. Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever helped another soul on Earth? Decoder ring time here. WTF is he on about A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff. Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt? Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown smell] Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in. Shill #2 The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a couple of sentences, or it starts to overload. If I can get another ALL CAPs bonus from |-|erc, I'm going to put a down payment on a Guth-o-mat Ultimate Deluxe. That should fix it. No. By the time that happens guths one lonely brain cell will have given up the ghost |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. *You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. *Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. *At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On 16 Jun, 00:26, BDK wrote:
In article 7869df2d-bcbc-41d0-bed3-d190b7f45024 @r27g2000prr.googlegroups.com, says... On Jun 16, 8:51*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 15, 2:06*pm, Government Shill #2 wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 13:11:38 -0700 (PDT), george wrote: On Jun 15, 8:42*am, Brad Guth wrote: On Jun 14, 12:59*pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. *You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. *Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. *At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless If I posted a link or cite to the holy grail, you'd find a way of disqualifying it. Can you or BDK prove or document to me that either of you have ever helped another soul on Earth? Decoder ring time here. WTF is he on about A standard decoder ring won't work. This is High Babblelooonian. You need a Guth-o-mat 9000 Babble Decoder for Brad's stuff. Did that FUD-master brain fart smell as good as it felt? Did babble FUD-babble babble babble babble babble babble? [brown smell] Damn! Now my Guth-o-mat 9000 has packed it in. Shill #2 The 9000 is garbage, the 9100 is better, but you can't enter more than a couple of sentences, or it starts to overload. -- BDK- Top of the government shill heap for over 10 years running! the bell rings, the sergeant-major all ATAQUEEEEEEEEE screams, is a bustling, young people who are in training do not know what to do, the more experienced now begin to prepare for battle, the young do not know where we are weapons they will fight, nor the sergeant's attention to them, what we do say, let's say another behind the sergeant, then where will the troops for the sergeant and the sergeant right now enters a reserved spot, and Younger people are standing in front of the door, when the sergeant comes out and the guy with 200 young people, he says the first serious, MY SON IF YOU WANT TO GO FIRST ONE WAS NOT NEEDED TO TALK DELETE. The king with great regret sending a messenger to the central kingdom of the emperor-king Kalucine, he commands the union of the imperial kingdoms and was prepared to fight the nomads, however, it was necessary to warn him about the message of the nomads. The messenger arrives and is announced, the emperor-king readily receives the message and shouted: -Get my horse! I have to make a trip now! Royal Guard! "Yes sir, a man yells of noble and lofty-We are at your disposal! The horses run faster than the wind and soon the emperor-king reaches the kingdom of the border, the kings meet with advisors and the royal guard, a subject so important that even the queen can hear ... |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 16, 10:04*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. *So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 17, 2:29*pm, GovShill wrote:
Has Herc been posting lately? Yeah. New ID though. Yup. Over in sci.skeptic will his usual BS claim... |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 16, 10:04*am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. *So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons in this way. And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to provide: "FUD" or "FUD-master" "ZNR" "redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the actual meaning). Have fun tapdancing around them again. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 17, 9:21*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 16, 10:04 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons in this way. And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to provide: "FUD" or "FUD-master" "ZNR" "redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the actual meaning). Have fun tapdancing around them again. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Working for the government or even privet industry that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 18, 5:24*am, Brad Guth wrote:
So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Working for the government or even privet industry that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. Decoder ring time. I noticed the word privet in there. Is he 'hedging' ??? |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 17, 1:16*pm, george wrote:
On Jun 18, 5:24*am, Brad Guth wrote: So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Working for the government or even privet industry that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. Decoder ring time. I noticed the word privet in there. Is he 'hedging' ??? You silly FUD-masters are always having such problems decoding our dyslexic and other skillfully encrypted stuff. That must be why MI6 and Qinetiq have to tell you brown-nosed clowns exactly how to act/ react, what to believe, how to think and of course what to say. "privet" is a secret code word to have you FUD-masters executed on site. Sorry about that, it just slipped out. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 17, 9:21*am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 16, 10:04 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons in this way. And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to provide: "FUD" or "FUD-master" "ZNR" "redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the actual meaning). Have fun tapdancing around them again. So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Since it was involved with technical information about testing of electronic systems, you wouldn't be able to follow the details anyway, so I won't waste my time. Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. Ah, additional tapdancing and goalpost sprints. HANL. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 18, 10:38*am, Bob Casanova wrote:
On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 17, 9:21 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 16, 10:04 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons in this way. And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to provide: "FUD" or "FUD-master" "ZNR" "redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the actual meaning). Have fun tapdancing around them again. So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Since it was involved with technical information about testing of electronic systems, you wouldn't be able to follow the details anyway, so I won't waste my time. Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. Ah, additional tapdancing and goalpost sprints. HANL. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." * * * * * * * * * * * * * - McNameless Yes, as per usual corrupt hedge funds fits your closed mindset that's clearly pro-Jewish regardless of the mostly negative consequences. You are in FUD-master heaven, which by the way Jews do not believe in because there's no such thing as any Jewish or Zionist hell, so everyone gets to move on up the ladder regardless of their actions, but only as long as they are Jewish and/or an essential minion that works on their behalf. Obviously you believe that each and every government agency and their many thousand contractors always tell us the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and otherwise at the very least Hitler would have to agree with you. http://www.wanttoknow.info/ http://translate.google.com/# Brad Guth, Brad_Guth, Brad.Guth, BradGuth, BG / “Guth Usenet” |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:38:10 -0700, Bob Casanova
wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? Gotten by selling grass? -- "Integrity has no need for rules" - Albert Camus |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Jun 18, 10:51*pm, Colanth wrote:
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:38:10 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? Gotten by selling grass? -- "Integrity has no need for rules" - Albert Camus Some types of privet may be poisonous . |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:08:40 -0700 (PDT), the following
appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 18, 10:38*am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 17, 9:21 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Thu, 16 Jun 2011 10:23:41 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 16, 10:04 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Wed, 15 Jun 2011 12:46:10 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 15, 12:06 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Tue, 14 Jun 2011 13:42:59 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 14, 12:59 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:19:24 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 13, 9:42 am, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sun, 12 Jun 2011 15:28:50 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 12, 3:19 pm, Bob Casanova wrote: On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 09:44:53 -0700, the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Bob Casanova : On Sat, 11 Jun 2011 02:56:13 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : On Jun 10, 9:09 pm, John Smith wrote: On 6/10/2011 9:04 PM, Brad Guth wrote: ... You are way off topic. When do you plan on fixing that? Off topic? Man, that vile creature is off planet and outta' its' gourd! Don't even distract it from things of real concern! ROFLOL! Then tell us why the history as told by William Mook is wrong. Who's William Mook? And why should anyone care? [Crickets...] So, FUD-masters and ZNR/GOP rednecks are not allowed to speak of anything investigative by William Mook. Message received loud and clear. The message you received is a product of your imagination. Asking for information isn't a refusal to allow posting of the information requested; in fact, it's the opposite. Language isn't your first language, is it? And your refusal to provide the requested information, along with definitions of your personal fabrications "FUD" and "ZNR", is indeed noted. Again. Silly boy. You must have flunked out of FUD-master 101. Obviously you are still very afraid of what William Mook and a few others have uncovered. Obviously you imagine I know who that is and care what he thinks. Too bad I don't. I see that you still quote dead people McCoy is dead? Cite? [Crickets...] Well? Is McCoy dead? If not (or if, as is more likely, you don't know) what, if anything other than stupidity, was your comment intended to convey? , perhaps because they can't refuse to support your perverted closed mindset. At least Hitler appreciated redneck folks like yourself. I see that you still refuse to provide any requested information, and prefer to post nonsense, made-up acronyms and personal attacks using non-standard definitions. Your choice if you want to look like an idiot; HANL. If I posted a link... ...it would improve your position regarding the honesty of your claims (but not, of course, regarding their validity; only the content of the cited link can do that). snip irrelevancies You've never demonstrated any such capability of accepting anything that isn't mainstream brown-nose peer approved by your good buddies. In other words, everything has to be status-quo NASA or otherwise government approved, or else it doesn't matter. So, what's your real point or objective? My "real point or objective" is exactly what I stated - a request for information from you, information which you refuse to provide. Have you ever published or officially supported anything original that wasn't already proven and/or accepted by others? Yep. In fact, before I retired I developed several things that weren't "already proven and/or accepted by others"; that's what engineering is all about. And I'm still waiting for that info from you. In other words, you cant admit to anything that was truly yours. Missed the part about "before I retired I developed several things that weren't 'already proven and/or accepted by others'; that's what engineering is all about.", did you? No surprise; you seem to ignore anything which doesn't support your personal agenda; you're identical to many other loons in this way. And I'm still waiting for those definitions you refuse to provide: "FUD" or "FUD-master" "ZNR" "redneck" (your personal definition, that is; I know the actual meaning). Have fun tapdancing around them again. So you still can't admit to anything that was all you, or even tell us the date and place of whatever you were specifically any part of. Since it was involved with technical information about testing of electronic systems, you wouldn't be able to follow the details anyway, so I won't waste my time. Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? that essentially provides everything and otherwise pays for everything and thereby owns all the rights to everything you've ever accomplished is not hardly the same thing as accomplishing anything on your own, now is it. Ah, additional tapdancing and goalpost sprints. HANL. Yes, as per usual corrupt hedge funds fits your closed mindset WHOOOSSHHHHH! snip Bradiocies -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
JFK Admits in secret OVal Office Recording...Moon landing was FAKE
On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 22:51:21 -0400, the following appeared
in sci.skeptic, posted by Colanth : On Sat, 18 Jun 2011 10:38:10 -0700, Bob Casanova wrote: On Fri, 17 Jun 2011 10:24:01 -0700 (PDT), the following appeared in sci.skeptic, posted by Brad Guth : Working for the government or even privet industry Hedge funds? Gotten by selling grass? Bush era. -- Bob C. "Evidence confirming an observation is evidence that the observation is wrong." - McNameless |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:46 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com