Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Occasional AB Listener wrote in message
Another problem is the potential health risks associated. Could a substantial increase in RF exposure -- especially around the household -- contribute to the rise in cancer-related diseases? NO! The rf levels are too low. Any worry of that is silly. The only REAL worries, are about how bad that mess will trash the HF and LOW VHF bands. I've already come up with my plan, if my receiver is assaulted by this unwanted rf in the area. It's simple. If my radio is assaulted by BPL leakage, I'll just assault the *******s right back. I'll turn my beam towards the power line, crank up my henry to full power, and blow and go. I'll put that frigging BPL system on hold! They will have so many data errors, a dial up connection will look attractive. In order to "cure" their newfound problem, they will have to clean up the leakage. If they want to keep me out, they will have to keep themselves within. ![]() A very close friend of mine, who happens to be a ham radio operator living near Switzerland, explained to me that most of Europe has scrapped plans for BPL because of possible RF-related diseases, as well as RF interference in commercial and amateur/SWL communications. Those idiots must have brain damage to believe that low a level of rf would be a threat to health....Sounds like they have been doing "head in the microwave" testing...MK |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hardline useage, pro's and cons | Antenna | |||
kaito KA1102 pros and cons | Shortwave |