Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#18
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I don't understand why clear channel would want to broadcast on
shortwave. Shortwave is just a medium, and not many people have the equipment to receive on that medium in the US. There is a reason that shortwave is dominated by government and privately owned stations that are subsidized by non-advertising money. The reason is small audience and no advertisers equates to no profit. Broadcast FM & MW and satellite FM have a much much bigger base of listeners and clear channel will go where the advertising and subscription money is. I have to admit that it would indeed be humurous to have Rush Limbaugh holding forth next to bible pounders, survivalists, denizens of the Montana forest and those who are still sure the commies are still poised to invade the U.S. via Mexico. Rush has a loyal group of followers now so why risk losing some by switching to a relatively unkown medium like shortwave. It would make as much sense to broadcast on LW. I'm still completely confused by: "Substitute the Name "Rush Limbaugh" for any of the Top 25 AM/FM Talk Radio Talents. Put each of them on Three Hours a Day which equals Eight Regular Hosts Around-the-Clock Monday thru Friday with several other Hosts representing 'different voices' featured during the Week-End." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
NPR on Shortwave Schedule & Freqs | Shortwave | |||
Rush Bounced from AFN? | Shortwave |