LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #11   Report Post  
Old July 22nd 05, 01:00 AM
John Smith
 
Posts: n/a
Default

You point is the current question pool is a lot easier than knowing
methods/terminology/material/concepts which have been
abandoned/changed/re-evaluated?

Really, well that is what I meant too!

ROFLOL!!!

John

"Brenda Ann" wrote in message
...

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
Brenda:

Have you ever looked at older tests???

Get real!!! Silk covered wire, TRF receivers, phenolic insulators,
regen receivers, coherers, "crystal detectors" and tubes are
already
seen mostly in museums...

Those old tests look difficult because the methods are now
understood
better, are totally out-dated, or the equip no longer used!

Yanno, even the bandwidth/freq allocs have changed and most would
guess wrong on those old questions!!!

ROFLOL!!!


I don't know what tests you are talking about, but I am talking
about
CURRENT QUESTION POOLS.. not stuff from the 40's.





 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC proposes to drop CW requirement on HF John Smith CB 90 August 5th 05 03:54 AM
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 06:41 PM
FCC to Drop HF Code Requirement David Stinson Boatanchors 41 August 29th 03 03:33 AM
There is no International Code Requirement and techs can operate N2EY Policy 1 July 31st 03 11:33 PM
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. Keith Policy 1 July 31st 03 04:46 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:43 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017