LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #10   Report Post  
Old September 24th 05, 01:29 AM
N9OGL
 
Posts: n/a
Default

...the only other thing that can be said in defense of W1AW is that it
is a *national* organization representing tens of thousands of hams that
is presumably "broadcasting" for the common good (and follows a regular,
*published* schedule, allowing others to dodge the "interference" if
they so wish), while K1MAN is a --single--private--individual-- who has
had some peculiar (shady ?) pecuniary interests associated with his
"broadcasts" in the past.


doesn't matter Interference is interference, and ANYONE or GROUP who
causes interference should pay regardless if it for the "common good".
As for published schedule the FCC has stated that do mean squat, my
view is that all who cause interference should pay.

Todd N9OGL
THE N9OGL SHOW
14.321.00



 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher General 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Policy 105 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
FCC SHUTS DOWN the 'Boy Broadcaster" from ME Maritime Phone Patcher Scanner 104 September 30th 05 04:17 PM
SW broadcaster at 3965, should it be there? Robert Casey Policy 1 October 3rd 04 11:31 AM
Parody of a SW broadcaster Al Patrick Shortwave 0 July 31st 03 05:19 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017