Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Well, I think we should give Eton a little credit here. (1) They
fessed up to a problem [they did not do so with the Sat800] and (2) they are offering make the owners whole plus provide a "premium" for the inconvenience. They learned from last time, so that's good. CCRadio owners with the failing display problem would have liked similar treatment. They do have a lot to learn, however, about creating false expectations with those availability dates. They'd be much better to overshoot the date by a lot and then be hero's when the radio becomes available "ahead of time." All those missed dates did become comical. I hope they succeed as a company. Not many sw mfgrs remaining. wrote: Ordinarily I wouldn't blink an eye over something like this. Recalls happen. They're a fact of life for all manufacturers. However, Eton's case is different. How many false production deadlines did they announce to their customers and the general public? Was anyone even able to keep track? If you're going to jerk your customers around in such a brazen way for close to a freaking decade, then quality control had better be A-OK when the product finally reaches the customer. So far as I can tell, Eton doesn't have one whit of respect for its customers, which is also probably why it resorts to silly tricks like E1 to sell more radios to the untutored buyer. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Sangean radios? Dont forget,I did once buy two of those Sangean ccrane
radios.The first one was the AM/FM/Weather Band/a couple of tv channels (I am watching 007 shaken not stirred Live and Let Die James Bond movie on my Radio tv right now,well,sort of anyway) that Stupid Art Bell and Stupid George Noory sometimes tout on C to C (Art Bell and George Noory really ARE STUPID!,THE LQQK STUPID TOO!) and I sent that Sangean piece of Crap BACK to Fortuna,California and then I bought and tried out a Stupid plastic Sangean ATS (or whatever they call it) 909 so-called Stupid plastic piece of Crap radio from Stupid ccrane.I sent that Stupid piece of plastic JUNK! BACK to Fortuna,California too.Please,do not deign to sell me a Stupid radio! cuhulin |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
SCREW!!! ccrane!!!!
cuhulin |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Do NOT buy any Sangean radios.You WILL get Gyped BIG TIME!
cuhulin |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
The ONLY reason the radio is being recalled is because it's MUCH cheaper to
fix the radio than to have to pay MILLIONS to people for burning their house to the ground... "wavetrapper" wrote in message ups.com... Well, I think we should give Eton a little credit here. (1) They fessed up to a problem [they did not do so with the Sat800] and (2) they are offering make the owners whole plus provide a "premium" for the inconvenience. They learned from last time, so that's good. CCRadio owners with the failing display problem would have liked similar treatment. They do have a lot to learn, however, about creating false expectations with those availability dates. They'd be much better to overshoot the date by a lot and then be hero's when the radio becomes available "ahead of time." All those missed dates did become comical. I hope they succeed as a company. Not many sw mfgrs remaining. wrote: Ordinarily I wouldn't blink an eye over something like this. Recalls happen. They're a fact of life for all manufacturers. However, Eton's case is different. How many false production deadlines did they announce to their customers and the general public? Was anyone even able to keep track? If you're going to jerk your customers around in such a brazen way for close to a freaking decade, then quality control had better be A-OK when the product finally reaches the customer. So far as I can tell, Eton doesn't have one whit of respect for its customers, which is also probably why it resorts to silly tricks like E1 to sell more radios to the untutored buyer. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
wavetrapper wrote:
Well, I think we should give Eton a little credit here. (1) They fessed up to a problem [they did not do so with the Sat800] and (2) they are offering make the owners whole plus provide a "premium" for the inconvenience. The case of Sat800 was different than the E1 recall, in that Sat 800 issues were matters of inconsistent quality, with a number of technical bugs that were worked out on the refurb table. The matter of E1 is a safety issue. And one that occurs with increasing frequency across many electronic lines as battery technology and chemistry changes. I just got a new battery in the mail, unbidden, btw, from Delphi for my MyFi. Seems that the original battery, too, has a bit of an overheating problem, related to a series of batteries manufactured in China. A similar recall was issued by Nikon for my DSLR battery, which was also a short run Chinese issue. Overheating and potential damage or injury, again, the case. In both cases, replacement of the battery, made in India was the solution. A recall for Sat 800 would have made no sense. Whereas in the case of E1, a recall forestalls a number of potentially larger problems. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Seeeee,I told y'all aboot them Stupid E1's a longgg time ago.(why dont
y'all listen to auld Hansom Larry? Ladies,, I need to get some of my emails out of there first if y'all ladies want to flirt with me) Flatly speaking,I still sayyyy,,, too much money for the amount of bread.And,I will never buy an E1 unless one shows up at the Goodwill thrift store for two dollars.Sheesh,they dont even put an AM Antenna in them Stupid E1's! y'all can have them! It's like buying a Motorscooter with a blown engyne.LQQK,them E1's are NOT worth the money! cuhulin |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Then it should stop using gimmicks like XM.
|
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DaviD - "dog-eating Jap company."
DaviD - Once Again 'you' treat us to more Enlightened Liberalism ! {Liberal Bias and Left-Wing Bigotry} DaviD - 'you' make such a Great 'little' Spokes Person for the Democrat Party of the USA ! ~ RHF |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|