Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . net... wrote in message oups.com... You realize if they ever turn on HD at night, DXing will be history. And the couple of hundred AM DXers left, most of whom are anti-radio and luddites, will just be SOL. I'm not aware of any anti-radio luddites, but if I ever meet one, I'll be sure to remind him to get rid of both his radios and his internet connection. As to DXers, I find that most today are very opposed to changes in radio, whether formatically or technically, and are very negative towards the way stations operate. I have disassociate myself form DX organisaions as they almost all seem to be out to change radio to the detriment of those of us who work in the field. Since essentially no radio listening, in terms of percentage, is skywave night listening, the other poings are moot. Two things: 1. I question the wisdom of dismissing the hobby of dx'ing in this news group. Sounds to me like you are trolling for trouble. He's a well known troll in other hobbie venues. dxAce Michigan USA |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
dxAce wrote: Telamon wrote: In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: "Frank Dresser" wrote in message ... "David Eduardo" wrote in message . net... wrote in message oups.com... You realize if they ever turn on HD at night, DXing will be history. And the couple of hundred AM DXers left, most of whom are anti-radio and luddites, will just be SOL. I'm not aware of any anti-radio luddites, but if I ever meet one, I'll be sure to remind him to get rid of both his radios and his internet connection. As to DXers, I find that most today are very opposed to changes in radio, whether formatically or technically, and are very negative towards the way stations operate. I have disassociate myself form DX organisaions as they almost all seem to be out to change radio to the detriment of those of us who work in the field. Since essentially no radio listening, in terms of percentage, is skywave night listening, the other poings are moot. Two things: 1. I question the wisdom of dismissing the hobby of dx'ing in this news group. Sounds to me like you are trolling for trouble. He's a well known troll in other hobbie venues. I haven't checked on him in other news groups. He seems to be reasonable in this news group in the past but lately he has gone down hill a little in my opinion. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , dxAce wrote: I haven't checked on him in other news groups. He seems to be reasonable in this news group in the past but lately he has gone down hill a little in my opinion. It is tough to have a high regard for AM DXers these days when they complain about your management, programming and technical operation, and then send one after another of false DX reports. As mentioned, the last one (on Thursday) reported listening to KTNQ with a slogan that has not been used for 13 or 14 years ("Radio Fiesta") and had a log of musical selections (KTNQ is talk). |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
"David Eduardo" wrote: "Telamon" wrote in message .com... In article , dxAce wrote: I haven't checked on him in other news groups. He seems to be reasonable in this news group in the past but lately he has gone down hill a little in my opinion. It is tough to have a high regard for AM DXers these days when they complain about your management, programming and technical operation, and then send one after another of false DX reports. As mentioned, the last one (on Thursday) reported listening to KTNQ with a slogan that has not been used for 13 or 14 years ("Radio Fiesta") and had a log of musical selections (KTNQ is talk). Well I for one would appreciate it if you did not use the news group to bash some of the people that use it for the right reasons. This is a public forum so you will just have to tolerate on topic dissimilar opinion. You indicate a fairly egregious example in your post but I would point out that it is very unfair of you to paint the people using this news group with the broad brush of that example. This a news group and if someone appears disruptive or if the information they post is suspect for any reason put them in the kill file. The news group is an information resource on the hobby of short wave listening and is only as good as the information that is posted. -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Telamon" wrote in message ... In article , "David Eduardo" wrote: It is tough to have a high regard for AM DXers these days when they complain about your management, programming and technical operation, and then send one after another of false DX reports. As mentioned, the last one (on Thursday) reported listening to KTNQ with a slogan that has not been used for 13 or 14 years ("Radio Fiesta") and had a log of musical selections (KTNQ is talk). Well I for one would appreciate it if you did not use the news group to bash some of the people that use it for the right reasons. This is a public forum so you will just have to tolerate on topic dissimilar opinion. I am specifically talking aobut AM (MW) DXers, now SW listeners or DXers. As I already stated.... You indicate a fairly egregious example in your post but I would point out that it is very unfair of you to paint the people using this news group with the broad brush of that example. We get at least one of those examples a week... and it has been a long time since we got a truthful AM DX report. This a news group and if someone appears disruptive or if the information they post is suspect for any reason put them in the kill file. The news group is an information resource on the hobby of short wave listening and is only as good as the information that is posted. And knowing how there are DXers who are lying does not help those who don't to understand why verie or QSL returns have declined? -- Telamon Ventura, California |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "dxAce" wrote in message ... 1. I question the wisdom of dismissing the hobby of dx'ing in this news group. Sounds to me like you are trolling for trouble. He's a well known troll in other hobbie venues. The only hobby venue I visit is this one. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() David "HFBPO" Gleason wrote: "dxAce" wrote in message ... 1. I question the wisdom of dismissing the hobby of dx'ing in this news group. Sounds to me like you are trolling for trouble. He's a well known troll in other hobbie venues. The only hobby venue I visit is this one. Now perhaps. dxAce Michigan USA |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
Help finding QST 1995 article please | Equipment | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting | |||
Why I Like The ARRL | Policy | |||
LQQKing for Construction Article | Antenna |