Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 20th 06, 08:33 PM posted to rec.radio.shortwave
dxAce
 
Posts: n/a
Default Know your listener/market



David Eduardo wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...


David Eduardo wrote:

"Eric F. Richards" wrote in message
...
...so I spent some time here arguing with a rock, er, an, um, "radio
consultant," who is convinced that by the flawed methodology used by
his clients and the ratings service that all radio listening is local,
and he uses those same flawed methodologies to show that his stations
are now number 1.

All radio listening is not local. But nearly all of it is. The main point
YOU do not get is that advertisers do not care about out of market
listening. They will not look at it and will defininately not pay for it.

In the case of AM, sykywave listening only happens at night, and
advertisers
buy very little night advertising on AMs unless it is local sports.

Int he case of FM, out of market listening is generally from adjacent
markets, and the out of market signals generally do not cover all the
geography of the peripheral market, so advertisers buy local stations
that
cover the entire local market, not just one area of it that is next to
another market.

The out of market listening on AM skywave is so small as to be
unmeasurable.
It is unwanted by advertisers, so the whole argument is moot.

The phrase that is important here is "flawed methodology."

...and so it goes with radio. As long as the methodology is skewed to
deliver the wanted results, it is as meaningless as AmEx's absurd
"market research."

Radio ratings diaries do not ask questions. They record day by day, hour
by
hour listening in blanks the diarykeeper fills in. The only instruction
is
to fill in each day what you listened to and when you listened. There is
no
questionnaire bias as there is no questionnaire.

So they will go on, with IBOC and so-called "HD" radio with all its
artifacts and dropouts, to the detriment of people who actually
listen.

IBOC and HD are the same thing. One is the technical term, the other is
the
marketing term. And it sounds great.


Really? It sure sounds like QRM here.


In LA, there are nearly a dozen HD-2 channels already active, all with
previously uncovered niche formats. Serving listener groups is not QRM.


Wiping out adjacent channels is.

IBOC = QRM

dxAce
Michigan
USA


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Help finding QST 1995 article please Dave Bullock Equipment 0 October 18th 04 03:32 PM
Help finding QST 1995 article please Dave Bullock Equipment 0 October 18th 04 03:32 PM
IBOC interference complaint - advice? WBRW Broadcasting 11 February 11th 04 01:08 AM
Why I Like The ARRL N2EY Policy 103 January 16th 04 12:56 AM
LQQKing for Construction Article NEDROG Antenna 4 September 16th 03 05:53 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017