David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

There is something very wrong and sick about you as shown by your need to
say something negative about nearly everyone you respond to. Canadians,
owners of R-75's, folks of certain political points of view, etc., etc.

What _is_ your problem?

Prancers_such_as_yourself.

You did not answer the question. You claim I am gay. Yet another insult
totally devoid of proof, evidence or relevance, in your attempt to be
Big-Man-On-Newsgroup.

If you're unhappy with your treatment in this group, feel free to troll
elsewhere.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

There is something very wrong and sick about you as shown by your need
to
say something negative about nearly everyone you respond to.
Canadians,
owners of R-75's, folks of certain political points of view, etc.,
etc.

What _is_ your problem?

Prancers_such_as_yourself.

You did not answer the question. You claim I am gay. Yet another insult
totally devoid of proof, evidence or relevance, in your attempt to be
Big-Man-On-Newsgroup.

If you're unhappy with your treatment in this group, feel free to troll
elsewhere.

As I said before, HD is a significant change in the way DXers will pursue
their hobby in the future. This is irrespective of whether I am in
broadcasting; I am a DXer and have been for about 48 years.

Apparently your definition of "trolling" is related to your desire to hide
from the truth and the changes necessary to save AM radio.

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

There is something very wrong and sick about you as shown by your need
to
say something negative about nearly everyone you respond to.
Canadians,
owners of R-75's, folks of certain political points of view, etc.,
etc.

What _is_ your problem?

Prancers_such_as_yourself.

You did not answer the question. You claim I am gay. Yet another insult
totally devoid of proof, evidence or relevance, in your attempt to be
Big-Man-On-Newsgroup.

If you're unhappy with your treatment in this group, feel free to troll
elsewhere.

As I said before, HD is a significant change in the way DXers will pursue
their hobby in the future. This is irrespective of whether I am in
broadcasting; I am a DXer and have been for about 48 years.

Apparently your definition of "trolling" is related to your desire to hide
from the truth and the changes necessary to save AM radio.

If AM is going to die, it's going to die; but it'll die much, much
faster if *******s like you have your way. And of course, you know
that, and you know that we know it. But, being a troll, your goal is
only to start trouble. You obviously have way too much time on your
hands...

Steve wrote:

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:
"dxAce" wrote in message
...

There is something very wrong and sick about you as shown by your need
to
say something negative about nearly everyone you respond to.
Canadians,
owners of R-75's, folks of certain political points of view, etc.,
etc.

What _is_ your problem?

Prancers_such_as_yourself.

You did not answer the question. You claim I am gay. Yet another insult
totally devoid of proof, evidence or relevance, in your attempt to be
Big-Man-On-Newsgroup.

If you're unhappy with your treatment in this group, feel free to troll
elsewhere.

As I said before, HD is a significant change in the way DXers will pursue
their hobby in the future. This is irrespective of whether I am in
broadcasting; I am a DXer and have been for about 48 years.

Apparently your definition of "trolling" is related to your desire to hide
from the truth and the changes necessary to save AM radio.

If AM is going to die, it's going to die; but it'll die much, much
faster if *******s like you have your way. And of course, you know
that, and you know that we know it. But, being a troll, your goal is
only to start trouble. You obviously have way too much time on your
hands...

Yep, for a fellow who 'claims' to somehow be in control of $12 billion or more
worth of radio properties...

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Yep, for a fellow who 'claims' to somehow be in control of $12 billion or
more
worth of radio properties...

I said our company was valued at that price. I am responsible for
programming performance on our radio properties... the former Hispanic
Broadcasting Corp. I never said I "control" the stations, as they are not
mine. MY duty is to make them perform better, which is exactly what we are
doing.

David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', prancer and fake Hispanic since
c.2000, and paid shill for Univision Radio/iBiquity wrote:

"dxAce" wrote in message
...

Yep, for a fellow who 'claims' to somehow be in control of $12 billion or
more
worth of radio properties...

I said our company was valued at that price. I am responsible for
programming performance on our radio properties... the former Hispanic
Broadcasting Corp. I never said I "control" the stations, as they are not
mine. MY duty is to make them perform better, which is exactly what we are
doing.

Spin.

You prancers do it so well.

dxAce
Michigan
USA

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

Apparently your definition of "trolling" is related to your desire to
hide
from the truth and the changes necessary to save AM radio.

If AM is going to die, it's going to die; but it'll die much, much
faster if *******s like you have your way.

AM in rated markets can give you an idea of what is happening. In the 7
years since Fall 1998 to the Winter, 2006, AM in Los Angeles has gone from
just under 24% of listening to 17%. That is a loss of about 30% of AM
listening in that period, or about 3% a year.

At the same time, the average age of AM listeners has crept up by over 5
years, and most of the listeners are in age groups that are of no interest
to most advertisers.

And LA is not the worst of cases, because there is such a huge collection of
ethnic groups that are only served on AM (staitons in farsi, Chinese
dialects, Korean, etc) that many AMs are still prosperous due to serving a
niche not served on AM. In markets like Columbus, GA or Wichita, things are
even worse.

And of course, you know
that, and you know that we know it.

I know no such thing. I know that AM has great potential with HD if the roll
out of receivers (7 new ones announced this week, including a $149 after
market car radio) comes fast enough and stations promote it enough.

But, being a troll, your goal is
only to start trouble. You obviously have way too much time on your
hands...

Being a realist, I know that AM, where I started in radio, is a 90 year old
medium and will definitely die if we do not improve it in a way that is
palpable by the listener, especially the under-45 crowd.

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:
"Steve" wrote in message

Apparently your definition of "trolling" is related to your desire to
hide
from the truth and the changes necessary to save AM radio.

If AM is going to die, it's going to die; but it'll die much, much
faster if *******s like you have your way.

AM in rated markets can give you an idea of what is happening. In the 7
years since Fall 1998 to the Winter, 2006, AM in Los Angeles has gone from
just under 24% of listening to 17%. That is a loss of about 30% of AM
listening in that period, or about 3% a year.

At the same time, the average age of AM listeners has crept up by over 5
years, and most of the listeners are in age groups that are of no interest
to most advertisers.


None of this is news, you idiot. What you and your marketing buddies
are wanting to do to AM is worse than its simply dying!


And LA is not the worst of cases, because there is such a huge collection of
ethnic groups that are only served on AM (staitons in farsi, Chinese
dialects, Korean, etc) that many AMs are still prosperous due to serving a
niche not served on AM. In markets like Columbus, GA or Wichita, things are
even worse.

And of course, you know
that, and you know that we know it.

I know no such thing. I know that AM has great potential with HD if the roll
out of receivers (7 new ones announced this week, including a $149 after
market car radio) comes fast enough and stations promote it enough.


You are a liar and a troll.

But, being a troll, your goal is
only to start trouble. You obviously have way too much time on your
hands...

Being a realist, I know that AM, where I started in radio, is a 90 year old
medium and will definitely die if we do not improve it in a way that is
palpable by the listener, especially the under-45 crowd.


If it's put into the hands of scum like you, it will die immediately.
Jerk.

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:

AM in rated markets can give you an idea of what is happening. In the 7
years since Fall 1998 to the Winter, 2006, AM in Los Angeles has gone
from
just under 24% of listening to 17%. That is a loss of about 30% of AM
listening in that period, or about 3% a year.

At the same time, the average age of AM listeners has crept up by over 5
years, and most of the listeners are in age groups that are of no
interest
to most advertisers.


None of this is news, you idiot.

I see. I fit is not news, what is the average share for AM in san Francisco?
El Paso? Atlanta? And what was it 8 years ago?

I see. You did not know. It _is_ news, but you are in denial that something
must be done.

What you and your marketing buddies
are wanting to do to AM is worse than its simply dying!

I see. taking something that is doing very poorly and not doing anything
would be the rightr step?

I know no such thing. I know that AM has great potential with HD if the
roll
out of receivers (7 new ones announced this week, including a $149 after
market car radio) comes fast enough and stations promote it enough.


You are a liar and a troll.

A troll says something outrageous.

I am saying that new radios are coming out, and the price is going down.
True. Not outrageous.

I am saying that there are over 2000 stations comitted to HD, and there are
new HD 2 channels going on the air daily. . True. Not otrageous.

I am saying AM will die if the current trend continues another 5 years. This
is also true, and quite frightening.

Being a realist, I know that AM, where I started in radio, is a 90 year
old
medium and will definitely die if we do not improve it in a way that is
palpable by the listener, especially the under-45 crowd.


If it's put into the hands of scum like you, it will die immediately.
Jerk

I have built, managed and programmed AMs for the last 42 years. The decline
is technology based, and can be corrected... with technology.

David Frackelton Gleason, posing as 'Eduardo', fake Hispanic since c.2000 wrote:

"Steve" wrote in message
oups.com...

David Eduardo wrote:

AM in rated markets can give you an idea of what is happening. In the 7
years since Fall 1998 to the Winter, 2006, AM in Los Angeles has gone
from
just under 24% of listening to 17%. That is a loss of about 30% of AM
listening in that period, or about 3% a year.

At the same time, the average age of AM listeners has crept up by over 5
years, and most of the listeners are in age groups that are of no
interest
to most advertisers.


None of this is news, you idiot.

I see. I fit is not news, what is the average share for AM in san Francisco?
El Paso? Atlanta? And what was it 8 years ago?

I see. You did not know. It _is_ news, but you are in denial that something
must be done.

What you and your marketing buddies
are wanting to do to AM is worse than its simply dying!

I see. taking something that is doing very poorly and not doing anything
would be the rightr step?

I know no such thing. I know that AM has great potential with HD if the
roll
out of receivers (7 new ones announced this week, including a $149 after
market car radio) comes fast enough and stations promote it enough.


You are a liar and a troll.

A troll says something outrageous.

I am saying that new radios are coming out, and the price is going down.
True. Not outrageous.

I am saying that there are over 2000 stations comitted to HD, and there are
new HD 2 channels going on the air daily. . True. Not otrageous.

I am saying AM will die if the current trend continues another 5 years. This
is also true, and quite frightening.

Being a realist, I know that AM, where I started in radio, is a 90 year
old
medium and will definitely die if we do not improve it in a way that is
palpable by the listener, especially the under-45 crowd.


If it's put into the hands of scum like you, it will die immediately.
Jerk

I have built, managed and programmed AMs for the last 42 years. The decline
is technology based, and can be corrected... with technology.

Nothing wrong with the technology, 'tard boy. AM (MW) comes in just fine here.
And it comes in even better without the HD/IBOC QRM.

Go shill your wares elsewhere.

dxAce
Michigan
USA