Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
In article , Nyssa
writes: wrote: What's happening in Canada is simply this: A survey was done and then a proposal. In both cases, there was clear majority support to end *mandatory* code testing for a ham license. But when such surveys and proposals are done here in the USA, there is no clear majority to end the code test. However, there's a big difference: IIRC, the RAC would *raise* the written requirements, and allow a prospective ham to skip the code test if they scored high enough on the written. That's a concept that hasn't been discussed much, if at all, outside of Canada. Imagine such a system in the USA: Perhaps we could have it that if you get a 90 or better on your General, you can skip Element 1. Or maybe create a new written test that could be taken *instead of* Element 1, and let the new ham decide which test to take - code, or the additional written. Could we all live with that? You've hit on exactly the reason I can't get behind the ARRL's motion to do away with Element 1 for General Class and *automatically* upgrading current Techs to General. Remember that back in 1998, ARRL proposed an automatic upgrade of all Novices and Tech Plus to General. FCC said no. What about the idea of automatically upgrading all Advanceds to Extra? Do you oppose that? There should still be a requirement to pass an additional test, be it the current Element 3 or an equivalent technical exam before the no-code Techs get General priviledges. No "freebies." If folks want HF, they must at least pass a technical test to show that they understand the information and the responsibilies that go with the upgrade. Funny, I didn't notice the ARRL saying that current General holders should be bumped up to Extra class if the code goes away. The General holders would have their class watered down even more with the sudden influx of newly minted Techs-to-Generals though. If the code must go, let it go, but *don't* ditch the requirements for the other technical elements. At least still make the Techs *earn* the upgrade to HF by showing some mastery of the basic knowledge they'll need to use it properly. But why *must* Element 1 go, if a majority of those who express an opinion want it to stay? 73 de Jim, N2EY |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Morse Code: One Wonders... and Begins to Think ! [ -- --- .-. ... . / -.-. --- -.. . ] | Shortwave | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
Canada says... "Drop the Code!" | Swap | |||
My response to Jim Wiley, KL7CC | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy |