Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Kelley wrote:
There is no convention describing unidirectional flow of alternating current. That is what you've been trying to say, i.e. current into one end of a coil. When the instantaneous voltage across a resistor is '+' on one end and '-' on the other, instantaneous current is flowing into the '+' end and out the '-' end, by convention. What do you mean there is no convention describing instantaneous current flow for AC? How could we possibly be in the 21st Century without such a convention? From _University_Physics_ by Young and Freedman, 9th edition: "i = I cos(wt) where 'i' is the instantaneous current ..." "But if we pass a sinusoidal current through a d'Arsonval meter, the torque on the moving coil varies sinusoidally, WITH ONE DIRECTION HALF THE TIME AND THE *OPPOSITE* DIRECTION THE OTHER HALF." (emphasis mine so you won't miss it) Instantaneous AC current "is represented by the projection (of a phasor) onto a horizontal axis ...". A '+' sign for the cos(wt) term represents one direction and a '-' sign represents the opposite direction. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
current/inductance discusion | Antenna | |||
A Subtle Detail of Reflection Coefficients (but important to know) | Antenna | |||
Eznec modeling loading coils? | Antenna |