Dave wrote:

...
and just how do you know who on this group was educated where??

maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common
sense to recognize snake oil when we see it??

A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new
invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced
first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show???



Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being
discussed?

If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real?

Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we
can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics
to any real degree ...

JS

On 1 Jun, 13:25, John Smith I wrote:
Dave wrote:

...

and just how do you know who on this group was educated where??

maybe those of us educated under the 'American' system have enough common
sense to recognize snake oil when we see it??

A question for you... when was the last time you saw some really new
invention that wasn't eventually proven to be fraud or bad science announced
first on a usenet news group??? or on a tv news show???

Did you use that same argument when quantum physics was first being
discussed?

If not, how did you know that "insane phenomenon" was real?

Although we have already developed experimental quantum computers and we
can exploit the phenomenon, we do not understand the underlying physics
to any real degree ...

JS

Hold on now John. He was one of the first to find out that american
mathematics
was given incorrect answers. He pointed that out when that MIT doctor
gave the mathematics to prove that adding the unit of time to both
sides
of the equation ( Gaussian statics law) changed a conservative field
to a non conservative field with respect to radiation.
On top of that most of the experts on the net agree with him.
To point out that american mathematics does not support
those of Gauss and Maxwell is indeed a major achievement and has
gained him mass support from the resident experts. All resist the idea
that
equilibrium exists.
Art