Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 21:52:18 -0600, tom wrote: Well you can believe what you like. I believe what occurs and is measurable. Hi Tom, It's amazing how after a period of silence, BOTH Art and Jaro pop up at the same time. Does Art have an antipodes sock-puppet? 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Well, I've been silent also. And for almost the same time period. I could be both of them. I do have 2 feet. tom K0TAR |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:20:32 -0600, tom wrote:
I do have 2 feet. But not one of them in Perth. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:24:44 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: On Thu, 05 Nov 2009 22:20:32 -0600, tom wrote: I do have 2 feet. But not one of them in Perth. No relation to anyone you are thinking_of/describing/etc, sorry to ruin your conspiracy theory. If you want to try and achieve a match to 50 ohms by moving the adjacent parasitic elements seriously close to the driven folded dipole, go for it. (I could dust off trusty Elnec and get a result.) But I'd be surprised if anyone who gives a rats about the consistency of the result would go down that path. I am very familair with how the commercial side-mounted dipoles and yagis are manufactured here in Australia, and I doubt that the rest of the world is dramatically different. In three simple words - series coax transformer. Let's agree that with an SMD you don't have parasitics to play around with - except for tower spacing (which has an impact on pattern, and variations are used for that end.) The Aussie manufacturers use eaxactly the same method on the FD on their yagis. That is why I suggested the O/P look into that approach. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:49:46 +0800, who where wrote:
But not one of them in Perth. No relation to anyone you are thinking_of/describing/etc, sorry to ruin your conspiracy theory. Your confirmation here doesn't ruin anything. Art would hug you no matter how you sign. Those he does have a remarkable need for retaining anonymity. He would have us believe it's because his supporters are easily bruised in the jostle. The following comment would support that: ...gives a rats about the consistency of the result would go down that path. which is another but perhaps left-handed confirmation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 08:18:49 -0800, Richard Clark
wrote: On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 15:49:46 +0800, who where wrote: But not one of them in Perth. No relation to anyone you are thinking_of/describing/etc, sorry to ruin your conspiracy theory. Your confirmation here doesn't ruin anything. Art would hug you no matter how you sign. Those he does have a remarkable need for retaining anonymity. He would have us believe it's because his supporters are easily bruised in the jostle. The following comment would support that: ...gives a rats about the consistency of the result would go down that path. which is another but perhaps left-handed confirmation. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC Whatever - and whoever Art is. I wonder why people like you carry on at a personal level towards posters whose views you don't share. And you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. You can crap on forever if you wish about how you might do it. Fini. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Sat, 07 Nov 2009 06:32:25 +0800, who where wrote:
you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. Yeah, as a longstanding convention for thousands of posters here, it is a strange thing about being public and open in this world isn't it? If you can't put your name to it, then any posting is only vacant spam. "No one at home" informs us all about quality. On the other hand, you choosing to be anonymous means you could have us believe you are writing from a cave on the Afghan/Pakistan border while waiting for your dialysis treatment to finish. Only Ossama and vampires avoid the limelight - as you call it. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. Your painted-into-the-corner explanation has nothing to do with the correlation between exhibited low feedpoint R and the proximity of passive elements to what would have ordinarily been a very HiZ folded element. Fini. We shall await your next post as 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
who where wrote:
Whatever - and whoever Art is. I wonder why people like you carry on at a personal level towards posters whose views you don't share. And you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. You can crap on forever if you wish about how you might do it. Fini. The "ways it's done commercially" depends a lot on the desired result. A choked line into a 50 ohm DE is an easy to do but not optimal method. It doesn't give best gain or BW or best F/B or best noise temperature and never ever gives the best combination of them for weak signal work. But it IS easy. And it's not always what the commercial antenna builders use. It's what you have noticed that they sell. Or you might be pushing how much it's used just a bit. tom K0TAR |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:55:19 -0600, tom wrote:
who where wrote: Whatever - and whoever Art is. I wonder why people like you carry on at a personal level towards posters whose views you don't share. And you seem to need the limelight, posting a name and callsign. I'm describing how the matching IS done commercially. You can crap on forever if you wish about how you might do it. Fini. The "ways it's done commercially" depends a lot on the desired result. A choked line into a 50 ohm DE is an easy to do but not optimal method. It doesn't give best gain or BW or best F/B or best noise temperature and never ever gives the best combination of them for weak signal work. But it IS easy. And it's not always what the commercial antenna builders use. It's what you have noticed that they sell. Or you might be pushing how much it's used just a bit. If you re-read what I posted, you will notice I stated "series coax transformer". An in-line impedance transforming section is totally different to simply stuffing RF choking on the line. It is the method the three major manufacturers here in Australia employ on their SMD's and the driven FD's on their yagis. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Shortwave | |||
Matching Coax Impedance: To Receiver or To Antenna ? | Antenna | |||
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? | Antenna | |||
.5-600 MHz LT5512 impedance matching | Homebrew | |||
impedance matching | General |