Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#191
|
|||
|
|||
|
#192
|
|||
|
|||
"Mike Coslo" wrote in message ... Ryan, KC8PMX wrote: Yep, As I was aware of that. And I never expected them to change for me at the last minute. BUT, I do believe that with enough warning ahead of time it should be considered more than fair for a VE team to make an adjustment. It should be no problem for a VEC to be able to send via code practice oscillator!!!!!! Wouldn't that be a shame if the VEC's have become so lazy they can't even send a code test via a key because they are relying on the code CD's and tapes. It's certainly possible, but in this day and age, I could see prospective amateur one complaining that the custom test was too easy or too hard, or complaining that he or she wanted to take the test from a CD instead of a real person, or some other such. Almost all of us can handle the standard test methods. The rest can be accomodated for. Over the course of my testing, I took tests at 4 different places: Williamsport PA, Butler PA, State College PA, and Lock Haven PA. ALL the VE teams were extremely helpful and accomodating. Those who knew of my hearing problem when I took Element 1 (twice, cuz I flunked the first time) were just great. The first time I took the test, they were more bothered by my failing it than I was, and the second time, I spoke to one of the VE's beforehand, and he outlined the different methods I might use, and explained the lengths they were capable of going to to accomodate my needs. I just want to point this out, because the tone of you letter sounds like you think that VE's are some sort of ossified "my way or the highway" people. They aren't. - Mike KB3EIA - I can say this.. I HAVE seen some VEs who were real *******s. Not wanting to help anyone. But I've seen those too, who helped all as much as they could. However, my former comment still stands, according to the rules I've read, if an applicant is handicapped and requires special equipment to use in testing, it is THEIR responsibility to provide it for the VEs to use. It is NOT the VEs place to provide it. There is a comment though I'd like to make about the My way or the Highway when it comes to testing. It is "supposed" to be required of the VEs to afford the candidates the best possible conditions in which to examine. IF someone in the waiting or even an applicant his/herself starts making it miserable for the others OR even before hand if the applicant fails to provide all required documentation, the VEs have a right to evict them from the area. JMS |
#194
|
|||
|
|||
"Ryan, KC8PMX"
wrote in message They are supposed to make those provisions. If they did not, they were in the wrong. However, I would not favor them using hand sent code with an oscillator for two reasons. 1) Oscillators are often not adjustable in pitch. 2) Some people who copy quite well have absolutely lousy fists and do not send good clean code. It takes a pretty good op to copy some of the people out there. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE And the fluctuation in CW skills is yet another reason to question its validity as a testing element. Kim W5TIT But gee Kim, if someone has "made it" as a VE, shouldn't they be proficient in the mode(s) they are testing on? At this point, it's not important or needed for morse testing has LONG AGO deleted the "sending" part of it and relied ONLY on the applicant decoding pre-recorded tapes. Seems to me that if someone is going to qualify as a VE, they should be at an extreme proficiency level...... I've helped correct tests for teachers for subjects I knew nothing about...nothing extradordinary there with multiple choice...or checking a submitted set of decoded morse text. If a VE or VE team cannot effectively send a method of communication like morse code as a required testing mode, it makes me wonder of the value of the mode in the first place. If they are relagated to only using CD's or tapes, I guess that would show the "dumbing down" of amateur radio, bringing it "one step further to extinction." The reliance on tapes and CDs is because it is NOT all that easy to be right on with sending code at any set speed (5, 13, 20 or whatever) by hand. It is far easier to "machine generate" code text at specific speeds and record them for a permanent use in testing. Seems to me it should not be a problem for the whole VE groups to have a set "pre-scripted" QSO's. There could be as many as needed, 10, 20, 30 or more pre-made QSO's to send. Far better to have the 20-30 or 40 prescripted QSOs recorded and simply play back one. I initially learned morse for the 5 wpm test using 78 rpm record set from (I think) AMECO. But, for all this speculation, the code test is soon to be just a historic footnote, so what's all the fuss? Cheers, Bill K2UNK |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Response to "21st Century" Part One (Code Test) | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | CB | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | CB |