Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003, JJ wrote:
Keith wrote: On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 02:28:18 GMT, "D. Stussy" wrote: Actually, this could be read in another way: There you go, we need some new thinkers on this newsgroup. It would help if we just had some thinkers, you included. Since I was "double quoted" in this, I'm not certain if that last comment was directed back to me or just for Keith. However, note that I recognize that there may be an unintended result of the recent international event - and that is certainly a "new thought" for this group. It also demonstrates that no body of law should refer to definitions made in another body of law that one has no control over and expect things to be the same if the referred-to law is changed when the referring law isn't. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|