Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 12:17:08 -0400, Dwight Stewart wrote: Technician Plus license holder The FCC does not issue technician plus license any more so I guess no one can operate on 10 meters that has passed the tech license test? Hey Dwight have you ever driven 56 in 55 mph zone? -- The Radio Page Ham, Police Scanner, Shortwave and more. http://www.kilowatt-radio.org/ Hey Keith, do actually know the FCC rules? They did stop issuing the novice and tech plus licenses, but the requiremenmts are still there. Now if a tech passes element one thet are still a tech but witt the same HF priviledges as a novice. They have to keep there CSCE as proof. The treaty stated that it no longer requires code, but would leave it up to the individual countries to set the rules, and UNTIL the fcc says CW is no longer needed, then the same rules apply as before the WRC treaty change. 73 de Keith |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dwight Stewart" wrote in message
... "Keith" wrote: Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3- 28.5 MHz. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? I would not do what you're seeking even if there was absolutely no chance at all for the FCC to catch me. When I joined the Amateur Radio community, I made a commitment to abide by the rules and regulations associated with it. That commitment is not based on the FCC's enforcement ability, but my own sense of what is good for this community. I personally benefit from a community that has an equal commitment to abide by the rules and regulations. I therefore would not do anything to upset that situation. I suspect you will eventually find that most other Technician license holders have a similar commitment to abide by the rules and regulation. By the way, your statement that "all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz" is simply not true - only a Technician Plus license holder (a Tech who has also passed the 5wpm code test) is allowed to operate on those frequencies. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ And, as I understand it, only until they "renew" or change their callsign, correct? In other words, when I renew my license, or if I change my callsign, I would only be licensed as a Technician, I think. Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ... "Keith" wrote: Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3- 28.5 MHz. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? I would not do what you're seeking even if there was absolutely no chance at all for the FCC to catch me. When I joined the Amateur Radio community, I made a commitment to abide by the rules and regulations associated with it. That commitment is not based on the FCC's enforcement ability, but my own sense of what is good for this community. I personally benefit from a community that has an equal commitment to abide by the rules and regulations. I therefore would not do anything to upset that situation. I suspect you will eventually find that most other Technician license holders have a similar commitment to abide by the rules and regulation. By the way, your statement that "all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz" is simply not true - only a Technician Plus license holder (a Tech who has also passed the 5wpm code test) is allowed to operate on those frequencies. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ And, as I understand it, only until they "renew" or change their callsign, correct? In other words, when I renew my license, or if I change my callsign, I would only be licensed as a Technician, I think. Kim W5TIT Your license will say Technician but you will retain your Tecnician Plus privileges forever (or until you upgrade to General) assuming that you keep your license current. Since the FCC database will no longer show the difference, keep a copy of your old Technician Plus license and/or your Technician Plus CSCE to be able to prove that you have those priviliges. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote in message
y.com... "Kim W5TIT" wrote in message ... "Dwight Stewart" wrote in message ... "Keith" wrote: Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3- 28.5 MHz. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? I would not do what you're seeking even if there was absolutely no chance at all for the FCC to catch me. When I joined the Amateur Radio community, I made a commitment to abide by the rules and regulations associated with it. That commitment is not based on the FCC's enforcement ability, but my own sense of what is good for this community. I personally benefit from a community that has an equal commitment to abide by the rules and regulations. I therefore would not do anything to upset that situation. I suspect you will eventually find that most other Technician license holders have a similar commitment to abide by the rules and regulation. By the way, your statement that "all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz" is simply not true - only a Technician Plus license holder (a Tech who has also passed the 5wpm code test) is allowed to operate on those frequencies. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ And, as I understand it, only until they "renew" or change their callsign, correct? In other words, when I renew my license, or if I change my callsign, I would only be licensed as a Technician, I think. Kim W5TIT Your license will say Technician but you will retain your Tecnician Plus privileges forever (or until you upgrade to General) assuming that you keep your license current. Since the FCC database will no longer show the difference, keep a copy of your old Technician Plus license and/or your Technician Plus CSCE to be able to prove that you have those priviliges. Dee D. Flint, N8UZE AH...OK. Well, that's good news to the folks who surely would have wished to keep the little bit of HF that they've got. Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dee D. Flint" wrote:
"Kim W5TIT" wrote: And, as I understand it, only until they "renew" or change their callsign, correct? In other words, when I renew my license, or if I change my callsign, I would only be licensed as a Technician, I think. Kim W5TIT Thanks for a quote of Kim's message, Dee. Sorry, Kim, I'm still having problems reading your messages (the same problem as before). I don't know if it's my server, your server, some software setting, or something else entirely. I haven't blocked your messages. I checked to make sure of that. They're still showing up in the newsgroup message list. However, whenever I select one to read, I get an error message saying the message is no longer on the server. Occasionally one will slip through that I can read, but 99 percent of your messages result in the same error. Again, this doesn't happen to messages from anyone else. In fact, your messages are the only times I've seen this error message at all. If this isn't happening to anyone else here (and nobody else has said anything), I can only assume the problem is with my server. So, it looks like the problem will remain until I switch servers (something I'm planning to do soon anyway). When it stops, I'll let you know. Of course, if you reply to this, I'll probably never see the reply. So, if you have something to say in reply, send it by email instead. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Keith" wrote in message ... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:29:59 -0400, Dwight Stewart wrote: " wrote: Let the FCC know that they can no longer keep you from your right to use the ten meter band allocation if you are a technician licensee. (snip) You don't have to use your identity, (snip) (snip) I will be on the air and I hope 10,000 or more no code technicians will join me. (snip) And I suspect anyone who did this would find himself very much alone on those frequencies. Only an idiot would risk his license doing something like this. That and your provocative email address, should be enough to convince most you message is nothing more than a message trolling for suckers foolish enough to take it seriously. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? -- The Radio Page Ham, Police Scanner, Shortwave and more. http://www.kilowatt-radio.org/ Thats not the point Keith. Item one there is no "RIGHT" to the ten meter sub-band to a Technician licensee. It is a PRIVILIDGE. Turn your license over and read that part. Item two by doing such a thing only proves what us 'coders' have said over and over. Its all about a bunch of CB outlaws that are trying to destroy Amateur Radio by bringing the lawless tactics and attituded to the ARS. Come to think of it...Go ahead boneheads. Show the FCC we were right. Dan/W4NTI |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Keith" wrote in message
... On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 03:29:59 -0400, Dwight Stewart wrote: " wrote: Let the FCC know that they can no longer keep you from your right to use the ten meter band allocation if you are a technician licensee. (snip) You don't have to use your identity, (snip) (snip) I will be on the air and I hope 10,000 or more no code technicians will join me. (snip) And I suspect anyone who did this would find himself very much alone on those frequencies. Only an idiot would risk his license doing something like this. That and your provocative email address, should be enough to convince most you message is nothing more than a message trolling for suckers foolish enough to take it seriously. Dwight Stewart (W5NET) http://www.qsl.net/w5net/ Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? -- The Radio Page Ham, Police Scanner, Shortwave and more. http://www.kilowatt-radio.org/ Whoa!!! Per the FCC website: "Technician The privileges of a Technician Class operator license include operating stations while transmitting on channels in any of 17 frequency bands above 50 MHz with up to 1,500 watts of power. To pass the Technician Class examination, at least 26 questions from a 35 question written examination must be answered correctly. A Technician Class licensee who also has passed a 5 words-per-minute (wpm) telegraphy examination receives privileges in four long distance shortwave bands in the HF range (3-30 MHz) (Refer to Section 97.301)." So, Techs don't have phone privileges from 28.3-28.5. Not only that, they don't have voice priveleges *anywhere* below 50 MHz. Kim W5TIT --- Posted via news://freenews.netfront.net Complaints to |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 25 Jul 2003 00:48:08 -0700, Keith
wrote: Dwight, There is no way for anyone to know if a tech license has passed a morse code test and all techs have voice privileges for 28.3-28.5 MHz. First of all, all Techs do not have the voice privileges you mentioned. Only Techs with Element 1 credit have those privileges. As for your assertion that there is no way for anyone to know the difference - Sure there is. Those who passed the test have: 1. A license (even if it's expired) in his/her name showing a class that had the code test as a requirement, OR 2. A Certificate of Successful Completion of Examination (CSCE) for Element 1, OR 3. Both. Consider this: hams do not live, or operate, in a vaccuum. Other people who live near you know who you are. Chances are that they also know whether you're a no-code Tech or one who has passed a code test. If not, they can always ask you, and ask to see proof of having Element 1 credit. Now, there may be no legal requirement for you to show it to them, BUT you see, anyone with code credit will be proud of that fact and happily show proof of having it...so if you refuse, all anyone has to do is advise FCC that you were heard on HF and refused to provide proof of having qualified for HF privileges when asked to do so. At that point, FCC sends you a letter asking to see proof of your having passed a code test. Refuse to prove to FCC that you have operating authority to operate where you were operating, and you leave yourself wide open to FCC enforcement action up to including the revocation of your license, a hefty fine, confiscation of your equipment...get the idea? Ham radio is not like CB where nobody cares whether you follow the rules or not. The amateur radio service is self-policing. When other hams hear you operating beyond the authority granted to you by your license, they WILL blow you in to FCC, period. What is the FCC going to do run around and check every tech license holder? No running around necessary. You get a letter in the mail. You either respond to the letter or face the consequences. Besides would you rather give up ten meters to truckers and CBers? The 10m band is in no danger of being reallocated to CB. Beyond that, there is no difference as far as I'm concerned between unlicensed pirates operating on a ham band and hams operating beyond the authority of their licenses. Both are operating where they have no authority to operate. Full stop, end of story. DE John, KC2HMZ |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|