Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 24 May 2004 11:46:01 -0400, (Twistedhed)
wrote: Someone may take pity on you, a self-professed Extra My license class is a matter of public record. There is no "self professing" about it. so you need email the FCC, as your ignorance will not be quenched by any other excepot the source. A roger beep fits neatly in part "b" of what you presented, and is not illegal on cb. Again, email the FCC for clarification, don't be so lazy and ignorant. Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Judging from the response that export radios get with these little sound effects, that these gimmicks would be a big hit with the toothless, trailer park, welfare set in this country. The fact that they are not being produced is pretty much a de-facto ruling that they are, in fact, illegal. So YOU need to get a clarification from the FCC. Go ahead, call them! The FCC had already made this clarification over 20 years ago, long before you were involved in the hobby. A roger beep is considered a sound effect, and as such is illegal. Prove me wrong if you can, but I won't hold my breath. [6] to transmit music, whistling, sound effects or any material to amuse or entertain; The FCC does not consider a roger beep to be a sound effect for "amusement" or "entertainment", Prove it! We have only your heresay. Provide the link or we'll all conclude that this is yet another of your lies. but rather a signal to signify the the end or beginning of a transmission. Superfluous on CB. Especially on AM, where a very distinct carrier dropping, signals the end of transmission. [7] to transmit any sound effect solely to attract attention; And that's exactly what a roger beep is. An echo box is a "sound effect" device and as such is prohibited by the above rule. Watching your scramble to argue with yourself has always been pleasurable to some of us, Davie-son. None took pleasure with the legality of an echo box. Merely more of your bull****. I'll take that as an acknowledgment of your inability to disprove my statement. Same goes for roger beeps. Since they do not facilitate communication, But they do facilitate communication. The FCC would appear to think otherwise. If not, then every last little Cobra 19 wannabe rig would have them installed by the factory. Here's another self-esteem killer for you Davie,,in addition to emailing the FCC to ascertain what EVERYONE else aready knows concerning roger beeps,,,,,ask around on this group,,in fact,,ask around on the hammie groups,,,see if ANY other hammie agrees with you,,,,,,anywhere. Bet you can't find any to agree with you. Anyone with a clear understanding of the rules knows that they are illegal. The rest? Well even you might know a handful of people who are as psychologically inept as you are and would agree with you. The mental hospitals are full of people who thought they could fly...... And even more who would swear to it. That's funny that you consider me having no respect for others merely because of my freebanding activity. It's not what you do, it's the tone you take when you defend it. Your staunch defending of freebanding even though it is illegal. Illegal operation which amounts to breaking federal law, which by logical definition makes you a CRIMINAL. Your point of view is not only lacking, but skewered, one-sided, incorrect, misinterpreted, flawed, and steadfastly fixed on remaining ignorant. I know you are, but what am I? Actually the dictionary definition is: 1. Based on observation or experiment. 2. Guided by practical experience and not theory. Nowhere does it call for "proof". Now go ahead and make the predictable next move of attempting to discredit my dictionary for you own faux-pax. There is only one standard among the media and it is the AP standards. They utilize one source, not the lightweight junior high books you refer. Try Websters Encyclopedic Unabridged Dictionary. See, Davie-son, the abridged versions are for people like yourself that need spoon-fed and not capable of correct interpretations. Again,,go to the source, as it most certainly does use the term "proof". Quoted verbatim: "Provable or verifiable by experiment or experience." Again,,your personal experience may indeed sway your belief, but without tangible proof, it is merely a theory. Attempting to educate you is futile, as you become angry and begin lodgin personal attacks,,another sure fire sign of your lack of skill, intellect, self-control, tolerance, and ability to remain on subject and hold rational debate with those who hold opposing opinions other than your own, but then again, we have always known that about yourself and such is what contributed to the demise of your self-esteem and your reputation. Thank you for being so predictable. I love it when you go on a rant, and start spewing out words, the meaning of which you're not entirely sure of. When you have to start a brand new thread and then adorn it mith my call, I'm sure I've hit a nerve. My job here is done for the day...... Perhaps Im not worthy, No "perhaps" about it. but that doesn't change the subject matter that you have been unable to provide for any of your claims. Unwilling, maybe. Unable? Only you are unable to put your money where your mouth is. Once again, you are simply not worth my trouble. My personal faith and believing in God has absolutely nothing to do with not believing one who has failed to produce anything concerning any of his claims, except angry diatribes, off-topic obsessions, hearsay, and personal opinion.. Sounds like you're talking about (or is that to?) yourself again. Among your other psychiatric ailments, are you also schizophrenic? Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Hall" wrote in message
... Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Not to mention the DX-959. (Never owned this one though.) http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html They even have a little R.B. LED, cute. 73 de Bert WA2SI Disclaimer: This post in no way condones or approves illegal operation on the CB. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Craig" wrote:
Disclaimer: This post in no way condones or approves illegal operation on the CB. Nice sig file, Bert. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Steveo wrote in message ...
"Bert Craig" wrote: Disclaimer: This post in no way condones or approves illegal operation on the CB. Nice sig file, Bert. Yes its kind of like the davemade and xforce pages where they say use of these amplifiers on cb violates fcc rules |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
"Bert Craig" wrote in message . net... "Dave Hall" wrote in message ... Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Not to mention the DX-959. (Never owned this one though.) http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html They even have a little R.B. LED, cute. 73 de Bert WA2SI Disclaimer: This post in no way condones or approves illegal operation on the CB. Hello Bert! Long time no hear. Landshark -- Treat people as if they were what they ought to be and you will help them become what they are capable of becoming. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Subject: N3CVJ claims Roger Beeps illegal
From: "Bert Craig" OSPAM Newsgroups: rec.radio.cb References: Lines: 23 X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158 X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165 Message-ID: t Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.190.176.189 X-Complaints-To: X-Trace: news4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net 1085439449 24.190.176.189 (Mon, 24 May 2004 18:57:29 EDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 May 2004 18:57:29 EDT Organization: Optimum Online Path: lobby!ngtf-m01.news.aol.com!ngpeer.news.aol.com!newsstand.cit .cornell.edu !news.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newshosting.com !nx01.iad01.newshosting. com!167.206.3.103.MISMATCH!news3.optonline.net!new s4.srv.hcvlny.cv.net.POS TED!not-for-mail "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Not to mention the DX-959. (Never owned this one though.) http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html They even have a little R.B. LED, cute. 73 de Bert WA2SI Disclaimer: This post in no way condones or approves illegal operation on the CB. Cool disclaimer shame on it for the need. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
"Dave Hall" wrote in message ... On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
In , "AKC KennelMaster"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . On Mon, 24 May 2004 22:57:29 GMT, "Bert Craig" wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message .. . Riddle me this then Batman, why are there no type accepted LEGAL CB radios produced with a roger beep or an echo? Sorry Dave, my old Galaxy DX-949 came stock woith a roger beep...and was/is FCC type accepted. http://www.galaxyradios.com/cb/949.html Would you happen to to have the FCC I.D. number of that radio? That radio, other than the roger beep, also has variable power, something else no other legal CB has. I have my doubts that this radio is entirely legal. Dave "Sandbagger" Wrong again, Dave. Here's the link: http://www.galaxyradios.com/2547.html There are no current equipment authorizations for any Galaxy CB radio. Search the database yourself if you want: https://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/oet/c...ericSearch.cfm ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FM Broadcast band as we know it going away? | Broadcasting | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
magic band and baby monitors | Homebrew | |||
Muilti band quad with a single loop? | Antenna | |||
keyclown radio dealers busted in spokane WA and walcott IW | CB |