From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring

out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.


And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble

seems to keep you going.

At least back before you guys found a

common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie.
It is apparent in your ramblings that you indeed believe such
self-serving and self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are
self-projecting, as no one else shares your minority and radical views
except these mystery hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to
identify. Hey, it's all good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and
conjured playmates can actually provide therepeutic benefits in
children.

On 24 Jan 2005 03:30:00 GMT, Steveo wrote:

Keith Hosman KC8TCQ wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:05:33 -0500, Keith Hosman KC8TCQ
wrote:


snip


PL is the Motorola copyrighted name for CTCS is stands for Private
Line. CTCS, PL, ETS are all the same thing.

sorry i hadn't read the post were you said that already

Glad to see you're back, how'd it go up there?


Still down here..... Columbus Indiana.... this laptop kicks ass heheh
connected at 54 MB/Sec ...... I downloaded all the latest Linux
distros and burned them to CD.

Didn't get as much snow here with the last storm, but it was cold
enough... did get a good bit of sleet and freezing rain though.

On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 21:15:52 -0600, itoldyouiamnotiamnotgeorge
wrote:

Keith Hosman KC8TCQ wrote in
news
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:05:33 -0500, Keith Hosman KC8TCQ
wrote:


snip


PL is the Motorola copyrighted name for CTCS is stands for Private
Line. CTCS, PL, ETS are all the same thing.


sorry i hadn't read the post were you said that already

sorry i didnt read the post where you said you that you saw it alreaDY
LOL


heheh thats what happens when you are not awake and haven't had any
coffee ( at least in my case)

"Keith Hosman KC8TCQ"


snip

Keith,
Thanks for the great sex over the weekend.You made me forget about Doug for
a while.

Love You,
Steveo


_________________________________________
Usenet Zone Free Binaries Usenet Server
More than 120,000 groups
Unlimited download
http://www.usenetzone.com to open account

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 19:10:39 -0500, Keith Hosman KC8TCQ
wrote:

On 24 Jan 2005 03:30:00 GMT, Steveo wrote:

Keith Hosman KC8TCQ wrote:
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 22:05:33 -0500, Keith Hosman KC8TCQ
wrote:


snip


PL is the Motorola copyrighted name for CTCS is stands for Private
Line. CTCS, PL, ETS are all the same thing.

sorry i hadn't read the post were you said that already

Glad to see you're back, how'd it go up there?


Still down here..... Columbus Indiana.... this laptop kicks ass heheh
connected at 54 MB/Sec ...... I downloaded all the latest Linux
distros and burned them to CD.

Didn't get as much snow here with the last storm, but it was cold
enough... did get a good bit of sleet and freezing rain though.



forgot to mention that it warmed up rather nicely today..... wish I
had my H-D with me would have been a great day to ride.

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:22:33 -0500, Dave Hall
wrote in :

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :

snip
Bust just like that military newsgroup that you

stuck your foot in your mouth over with Frank,


I have to agree with Shark on this one,,


Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL!

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.


You're confused, Dave.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.


Newsflash: I argue with Twisty to keep my own wits sharp. I argue with
you because you are ignorant.


At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....


Your political spectrum analyzer is out of alignment, Dave. And you
haven't read a single word I've written because, and to put it simple
enough for a 1st grader, I don't take sides when it comes to politics.
I oppose Bush because he's a criminal, not because he's a Republican.
And if you had any evidence..... or even a reasonable suspicion that
Kerry was in any way a criminal, I could accept it. But so far you
have offered nothing but excuses, logical fallacies, and websites with
forged documents and paranoid rants. If you are really a supporter of
the Republican party then you should keep quiet on political issues
because you are giving your party some very poor representation.






----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==----
http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 100,000 Newsgroups
---= East/West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 18:21:42 -0600, "Steveo"
wrote:


"Keith Hosman KC8TCQ"


snip

Keith,
Thanks for the great sex over the weekend.You made me forget about Doug for
a while.

Love You,
Steveo



grow up and get a life........ you know you really have a miserable
existance if this is what your life consists of... I pity you.

"Dave Hall" wrote in message
...
At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....

Dave
"Sandbagger"

What makes you think that "they" are on the
wrong side of the political spectrum? Now think about
it Dave, Frank has said a number of times he is not a
liberal, he just doesn't like Bush's policy's. Twist is what
I would say a liberal, but how does that make him on the
"wrong side"? Because you don't agree with them, that
makes them on the wrong side?
I don't agree with Geo on much, but politically he's
seems to have the same views as I, but should I disagree
with that because I don't like him?

Landshark


--
Is it so frightening to have me at your shoulder?
Thunder and lightning couldn't be bolder.
I'll write on your tombstone, ``I thank you for dinner.''
This game that we animals play is a winner.


Landshark

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring
out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.


And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.

Who says it has to be a ham?



It's also no secret that his psychobabble
seems to keep you going.
At least back before you guys found a
common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....
An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie.
It is apparent in your ramblings that you indeed believe such
self-serving and self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are
self-projecting, as no one else shares your minority and radical views
except these mystery hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to
identify. Hey, it's all good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and
conjured playmates can actually provide therepeutic benefits in
children.

I'm not the one who changes my screen name at the drop of a hat.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 16:22:58 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:


Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring out the "best" in our
little psychotic friend.


You're confused, Dave.

Hardly.



It's also no secret that his psychobabble seems to keep you going.


Newsflash: I argue with Twisty to keep my own wits sharp.

You admitted it yourself, Twisty "debates" by playing head games with
people. That's hardly your style Frank. Certainly not something worthy
enough to be called "sharpening your wits".


I argue with you because you are ignorant.

Which started coincidentally when you found out that I support the
opposite political party. Before that we were on good terms. Now you
"think" (and I use the term loosely) that I'm an idiot for it. If that
isn't a partisan pundit attitude, I don't know what is.

Only an idiot argues with another idiot Frank. You "argue" with me,
because you are unable to present your "side" with anything other than
your own opinions. The fact that I can effectively deflect your
"facts" as the op-ed opinions that they truly are frustrates you.

The facts are not in your favor Frank.

At least back before you guys found a common love for the wrong side
of the political spectrum....


Your political spectrum analyzer is out of alignment, Dave.

You certainly are entitled to your opinion, as wrong as it might
be.....

And you
haven't read a single word I've written because, and to put it simple
enough for a 1st grader, I don't take sides when it comes to politics.
I oppose Bush because he's a criminal, not because he's a Republican.

Where is the proof that Bush is a "criminal"? What is your basis for
making such an outlandishly absurd and so typically partisan claim?


And if you had any evidence..... or even a reasonable suspicion that
Kerry was in any way a criminal, I could accept it.

The evidence is there. It came out of Kerry's own mouth. He admitted
to taking part in the atrocities in Vietnam on Meet the Press on April
18th 1971. Now Frank, you are a man who claims to embrace logic, so
riddle me this then. If Kerry is telling the truth about his part in
these "atrocities", then is he not guilty of a war crime? On the other
hand, if he didn't take part, and the whole issue was a blown up
fabrication, doesn't that make him a liar? Would you want someone who
lied like that to be your CNC? How many other lies did he make in the
aftermath of the who winter soldier debacle and the VVAW movement
which followed?


But so far you
have offered nothing but excuses, logical fallacies, and websites with
forged documents and paranoid rants.

As opposed to the sites you provided which were nothing more than the
flip side of what I provided?

You discard what I provided because you refuse to acknowledge the
possibility. You don't want to believe it so you deny it. You came up
with some sort of "font analysis" on one document, and concluded that
it was a forgery, so then you projected that conclusion to all the
rest of the evidence.


If you are really a supporter of
the Republican party then you should keep quiet on political issues
because you are giving your party some very poor representation.

I am a conservative, and I support those who best represent my
political views.

I also believe in the history and honor of our country, its military
and the judgement of its leader in matters of national security and
enemies of the state.

Dave
"Sandbagger"