On Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in :
snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring
out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.


And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.

Who says it has to be a ham?



It's also no secret that his psychobabble
seems to keep you going.
At least back before you guys found a
common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....
An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie.
It is apparent in your ramblings that you indeed believe such
self-serving and self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are
self-projecting, as no one else shares your minority and radical views
except these mystery hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to
identify. Hey, it's all good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and
conjured playmates can actually provide therepeutic benefits in
children.

I'm not the one who changes my screen name at the drop of a hat.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

NNTP-Posting-Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 25, 2005, 10:34am (EST-1)
From: Dave Hall Group: =A0=A0 rec.radio.cb
Subject: =A0=A0 Roger Beeps 100% ILLEGAL Date: =A0=A0 Tue, Jan 25,
2005, 11:34am Organization: =A0=A0 home.ptd.net/~n3cvj X-Trace: =A0=A0
sv3-vM3XMc8/W17T/MJSuVU+Mm09AW3YxGyjG/Cm/AEv8v+A27wk6JS7SKqn50xJhZL7DMvbhk=
56U1mcXO4!aoIWBsLgS39x93Argz8UGjy+wOTU0zcOEbytPIa5 TRjLu6brU9AR0S2fTKXcbFGf=
MweKqO9bb7pY!UdMvXYbyDoA=3D
X-Complaints-To: =A0=A0 X-DMCA-Complaints-To: =A0=A0
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Please be sure to forward a
copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: =A0=A0 Otherwise we will be
unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: =A0=A0 1.3.22 On
Mon, 24 Jan 2005 13:49:42 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 08:24:17 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:
On Thu, 20 Jan 2005 11:01:37 -0500, (Twistedhed)
wrote in : snip
(Notice how lately he invokes my name in his replies to you, and you in
his replies to me. LOL! )

Well, it's no coincidence that you and I bring

out the "best" in our little psychotic friend.

And it's no coincidence you begin your very next post with an insult in
regards to the one that asked you to please illustrate or name this
other mystery hammie you claimed agrees with you that roger beeps are
illegal.

Who says it has to be a ham?

Why,you did, Davie,,,go back and read your response to what I said, as
your memory has been savagely raped. You clearly responded that you are
not the only ham present in this group to maintain that roger beeps are
illegal. Of course, asking you to share your hallucination with the
group has caused your gears to slip...again.


It's also no secret that his psychobabble

seems to keep you going.



Coming from one who suffers vivid hallucinations and insists others can
view your hallucinations also, is quite closer to any "psychobabble"
than anything anyone else in this group has ever done, with the
exception of N8WWM who you have not only defended many times, but
admitted (after being caught) that you "fell into his bull****". You
need to stop permitting your emotions to lead you around by the nose, as
anyone is able to come along and elicit your ire.



At least back before you guys found a

common love for the wrong side of the political
spectrum....

An excellent example of your twistedness, as one who holds an opposing
view to your own myopic views are not wrong, Davie. It is apparent in
your ramblings that you indeed believe such self-serving and
self-limiting statements, but as usual, you are self-projecting, as no
one else shares your minority and radical views except these mystery
hammies you continue to invoke but are unable to identify. Hey, it's all
good, Davie,,people like you need comfort and conjured playmates can
actually provide therepeutic benefits in children.

I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.


Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat.. You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.


You're the one who ignorantly and incorrectly hold a dx'er and and a
speeder going faster than 70 MPH as a "federal criminal" based on your
claim that the laws were enacted by the feds.


You're the one who incorrectly shouts that "roger beeps are illegal",
based on nothing more than your inability to locate a law permitting
them.



You're the one who incorrectly claimed other hams agreed with your
stated ignorance that roger beeps were illegal and began stuttering over
your claim when your hallucinations were observed empiracally, noted,
and questioned.


You're the one whose posting history is chock full of insults to those
with whom you disagree You're the one who claims your derogatory terms
are not born of emotion.



In fact, if one were to bother, one could google "sandbagger" and check
your posts to anyone who you ever disagreed with, long before you made
me your inner personal demon and anti-christ. In fact, you have been
told about your inability to maintain proper communications skill sans
insult long before I ever pointed out your inabilities to do so.



But.....sharing your selective concern over what is routinely practiced
in here by many illustrates your agenda. Whenever you are cornered with
your own words, you run and attempt to distance yourself from them and
make your posts personal, offtopic, and try to direct them towards
anything else, as your bull**** is in the spotlight. Yes, Davie, you are
the one that made all those claims above..only you, all alone, as no one
agrees with you,,,,except N8WWM. Now stop posting the gay porn. Your
temper has the best of you, but you are laying quite the proper trail
with your pal Dogie.
Enjoy. : )

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.


Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat..

You give me far more credit than I deserve. I use a single newserver
to access this newsgroup. Nothing else.

You have failed to prove otherwise. Your opinion in that regard is
worthless.


You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.

I never made that claim.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.

Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat..

You give me far more credit than I deserve.


I give you credit for exactly what you deserve.

I use a single newserver to access this

newsgroup. Nothing else.


Nevertheless, your access path has changed


You have failed to prove otherwise. Your opinion in that regard is
worthless.

You're the one that can
not distinguish between fiduciary and judiciary, resulting in your
inability to explain any differences between a dx'er and a speeder in
regards to this "federal law" you incorrectly harp about.

I never made that claim.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


It's not a difficult matter, Dave, but it has you beside yourself with
confusion and pain.
Being forced to face yourself yields some interesting retreats from your
dulled senses.
The only criteria you submitted for your ignorant and erroneous claim
that one who dx'es is a "federal criminal", is that they are breaking a
law enacted by the federal government....so goes the 70 MPH mandate. Let
us know when you prevail over this inner struggle I caused you, and let
us know which side of you won.

On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 15:41:27 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 10:55:08 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:
I'm not the one who changes my screen name
at the drop of a hat.

Quite right,,you're the one who changes their access path to the group
with different servers at the drop of a hat..

You give me far more credit than I deserve.


I give you credit for exactly what you deserve.

I use a single newserver to access this
newsgroup. Nothing else.

Nevertheless, your access path has changed

So? It's no secret that I have a different IP when I'm at work versus
when I'm at home. But the news server is the same. Always has been.

Now go change your NIC again and spin this a bit more....

Dave
"Sandbagger"

Heheh..Dave,. your linkage has slipped again. Here's a few more
N3CVJ-isms to keep you spinning and paying proper homage over the
weekend.
It's also of very interesting note you are the only one who hasn't been
forged in this group,,your timing of the forges and your "gay attacks"
on Frank and the group were not only coincidental, but impeccable.
Your voice is no longer one of integrity or even remote reason.
Off you go, now.

-
N3CVJ-isms:
"I really can't condemn illegal operation, since I've been involved in
it
as well. But I am really becoming disgusted with the degree and sheer
volume of operators that seemingly have the goods."



"Once one chooses to engage in the criminal mentality of breaking
federal law, they can no longer be trusted." N3CVJ


"I=A0try not to come down hard on illegal radio operators, since I'd be
hypocritical in doing so" N3CVJ



"If the shoe fits..if you don't like being called a federal criminal
perhaps you should change your ways" (in regards to dx) N3CVJ




"I find it just a tad disgusting that poor,
unskilled, Hispanic people
can come to this country" N3CVJ


"I have ALWAYS used this account that you
see here." (voicenet) N3CVJ


"I've always accessed this group in the same manner" (supernews) N3CVJ

.........in addition to
Sprint (via Bedford County Computer Services in Roaring Sprig, Pa.),
Yipes! Qwest, usenetserver.com,ucis.vill.edu, cats.vill.edu, ptd.net


"Calls to the FCC fall on deaf ears, and I am into radio to enjoy
myself, not to create friction with various groups. Maybe my approach is
a bit of a cop-out, but personally, as long as they don't affect my
operation
then I have nothing to complain about. Life is too full of aggrevation
(sic) as it
is, I'm not going to look for it in my hobbies"
N3CVJ


"Perhaps not. But calls to the FCC are one way to fight back" N3CVJ



"Some of the excuses and reasons I've heard so far are feeble at best.
There is
really NO legitimate reason for ANY ham to need general coverage
transmit,
unless he planned on USING It" N3CVJ


"I can now access the worldlynx news server from other internet means."
(US West)
N3CVJ


=A0"I have always had the ability to access the INTERNET through a T1
line, as well as my dialup account."
N3CV



"Canada must be a wonderful place. There the Cops are radio literate,
the
truckers are couteous, and intelligent, and people obey all facets of
the
law. And best of all, a 29 cent wire dipole will outperform a $100
"gain"
vertical. If it wasn't so dang cold, I'd love to move there " N3CVJ


"I don't typically modify radios (unless they want to pay dearly for it)
N3CVJ


"I seem to find a disproportionate amount of females on ham radio.
That's why I like cb" N3CVJ


"I find truckers are the worst radio operators on the band" N3CVJ


"The biggest problem on CB today is ignorance" N3CVJ


"Roger beeps are illegal" N3CVJ


"You can't produce a rule saying they (roger beeps) are legal" N3CVJ


"You are a federal criminal. It (the dx rule) is federal law"
N3CVJ

"Most hams still respect the rules, and would
not be an accomplise (sic) to a criminal act"
N3CVJ

"My point is that hams are just as capable of being negligent of the
rules as CBers."
N3CVJ

On Fri, 28 Jan 2005 10:39:23 -0500, (I
AmnotGeorgeBush) wrote:

Heheh..Dave,. your linkage has slipped again. Here's a few more
N3CVJ-isms to keep you spinning and paying proper homage over the
weekend.
It's also of very interesting note you are the only one who hasn't been
forged in this group,,your timing of the forges and your "gay attacks"
on Frank and the group were not only coincidental, but impeccable.

Wasn't me, and you couldn't prove it if it was. That sort of stuff is
beneath my style.



N3CVJ-isms:

Wow.... How much time and trouble did you go through to extract my
words of wisdom over the last 10 years for you to drool over? I
certainly wouldn't put that much effort into worshipping you the way
you seem to be doing to me.

Sorry, but I'm not your type. I'm still sane.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

I bought a Realistic TRC 465 SSB which receives but only hums on
transmit. Can anyone recommend a GOOD cb shop for repairs? I really
want to use this radio and would like it fixed. Thanks.

Communication Experts

www.communicationsexperts.com

"Barry" wrote in message
...
I bought a Realistic TRC 465 SSB which receives but only hums on
transmit. Can anyone recommend a GOOD cb shop for repairs? I really
want to use this radio and would like it fixed. Thanks.