| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
January 28th 06, 05:25 AM
posted to rec.radio.cb
|
|||
|
|||
102" whip
wrote in message
... True, the general consensus is that I am wrong. Years ago the general consensus was that the world was flat. hehehe hopefully you found an ant that is better than the whip and you will go down in the annals of history as another copernicus. cheers as its getting late on the east coast. It looks like I have to explain once again exactly what I am saying. No shortened antenna can beat a full 1/4 wave length antenna of good design. I have shown this in my tests. The X-Terminator can be beat by a 1/4 wave length antenna, but with the same tests the X-Terminator can beat the RS 102" ss whip. No, you stated that you only tested it against a RS 102". You never stated "No shortened antenna can beat a full 1/4 wave length antenna of good design" until this post. |
|
#2
January 28th 06, 05:35 AM
posted to rec.radio.cb
|
|||
|
|||
|
102" whip
No shortened antenna can beat a full 1/4 wave length antenna of good design. I have shown this in my tests. The X-Terminator can be beat by a 1/4 wave length antenna, but with the same tests the X-Terminator can beat the RS 102" ss whip. No, you stated that you only tested it against a RS 102". You never stated "No shortened antenna can beat a full 1/4 wave length antenna of good design" until this post. I have said that many times today and in the past. I have even shown 1/4 wave antennas that will beat the X-Terminator. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Impedance of pull-up whip on SW Receiver? | Shortwave | |||
| Why do you use a whip antenna? | Shortwave | |||
| Blast from the past...........102 SS whip | CB | |||
| Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
| Sony Portable versus Tabletops | Shortwave | |||
Hybrid Mode
