Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: The last five Presidents of the United States seem to have had a clear vision of volunteerism...and also about "service". Indeed. Jim could have volunteered to serve in the Unites States Military. He had other more important things to do like pursue a degree in engineering, and looking out for himself. And the military still needs engineers, even if they are civilians. Go to WWW.USAJOBS.OPM.GOV and select "Middle East." Guess they shudda consulted with you two first, eh...?!?! I'm good with volunteerism in the U.S. armed services. No, you're not I must be. I volunteered. I kept volunteering. No...you keep "volunteering" to collect a paycheck. Hi! I suppose you wrote "VOID" across your paychecks and sent them back? You quite obviously have a problem with the society that the Constitution you alleged to support and defend provides. How so? Tell Jim to let us know how it's going when he gets there. You swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Yep. However there's no "enemies" of the Constitution here... So why are you bringing up the defense of the Constitution here? You really ought to get your stuff in one sock before starting off on a new rant tangent. Obviously you have a problem, however, with people who live their lives within that same Constitution. Explain. No explanation is necessary. Your on-going support of Lennie's cowardly "Jimmie Noserve"'s rants is evidence enough. You're Quitevague about your newest accusations. Please be more specific. Hey, while you're at it, why don't you produce authentic documentation of your alleged "A" NCOIC MARS/Okinawa. Right after we get some of the information we've been asking YOU for for YEARS... So then, you really are a liar. You're the very thing you claim of everyone else. So...was your Oath as a member of the Armed Forces just some words you recited in order to get a federal job? Sure looks that way. I'm offended that Jim claimed "service in other ways." What other ways? Why would you expect Jim to answer such an insulting question when YOU have overtly refused to answer questions he's put to you for YEARS, Brain? Why wouldn't he? He has no problem insulting others. (Rhetorical question...we know the answer...you're a coward...) Hi, hi! That's rich coming from the guy who couldn't make Dayton to see me. Seven hostile actions? Hi! So is Jim checking out the governments needs over in the desert? He would be drawing a nice, tax-free paycheck. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: Doesn't matter. Jimmie Noserve is an EXPERT on the military. He KNOWS how military men feel/act/etc. Jimmie can "correct" any veterans' "mistakes." He's read several books on the subject... Jimmy is Mr. Fiction. "No Experience = Shut-Up" according to da double standard. So far, nothing Jim has stated has been incorrect. Hi! Silly Gunny has his blinders on. Jim constantly makes statements on things which he has no experience in. Jim constantly tells others to be silent on things which they have little or no experience in. That is a clear double-standard. That you won't see it is telling. He's corrected you AND Lennie on numerous military issues, communications and otherwise, and has yet to be shown to be wrong. I recall you being corrected on military and MARS communications issues. Often. Highly, highly unlikely. Guys like Jim have no problem letting guys like you, me, and Steve take the risks. They set way, way back and make the calls. Don't try to lump yourself in with me, Brain. Most of my time in the USMC was crewing the MC version of the Pave Low (CH53A and D), a lot of which got me put in places I was not real happy to be in. The Reluctant Marine! Figures. Even reluctant people serve. So how did Jim serve in other way? You and Lennie got to play rear area office clerk for most of your tours. I give you some added credit for your Somalia tour, your misrepresentation of your Amateur Radio exploits notwithstanding, but not by much. You don't "give" me anything. My service is not up for your approval. Later on you learn that they gave blood at the ARC Bloodmobile on the third Thursday and are very, very good with it all. They "served" in other ways. Cheers with a little glass of OJ. I lucked out. The only "injury" I suffered in the field was some sand that got in under my visor and flight glasses and irritated the be-jeebers out of me. So how did you malinger your way into a medical discharge requiring rehabilitative therapy? Some of my colleagues weren't so lucky. That bloodmobile donation you just made fun of was their ticket home alive instead of in a bag. Steve, K4YZ People everywhere are lucky because others give blood and organ tissue. But Jim says he "served in other ways." What ways? |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Some of my colleagues weren't so lucky. That bloodmobile donation you just made fun of was their ticket home alive instead of in a bag. Steve, K4YZ People everywhere are lucky because others give blood and organ tissue. But Jim says he "served in other ways." What ways? .. Give it a rest, old timer. What Steve (or any other person) did or did not do in service to this country is none of your business. Nobody owes you an answer to anything. It is probably just as well that Steve didn't bump into you at Dayton. You would have had to walk all the way back to your car to change your Relys. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Sat,May 21 2005 3:59 pm
wrote: From: "bb" on Thurs,May 19 2005 3:05 pm K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: Stebie will probably babble about "calling the VA" for "verification" on that. Steve either has documentation or he doesn't. And if he doesn't, his words come back to haunt him once more. No documentation means you never did it. No haunting, Brain. Hi! Then produce your documentation. Tsk. Stebie doesn't have any. Claims, brags, hot air, yes. NO PROOF. Even if his references could confirm his claims, it's likely they wouldn't. There's a reason he was the "A" NCOIC. Brian, it doesn't matter in HERE. Stebie will "come back" with "you are LYING" and make some kind of dire implication "to reveal all to your wife" or some other nonsense and just ignore production of actual proof. Stebie will name-call, insult, denigrate anyone demanding that HE produce any proof and that will be that. It's a standard Bluff. The "haunting", here, is you refusing to act on the information provided you. I don't act on "hot" tips. Produce authentic documentation. Stebie no got them. Tsk. Hmmmm? No docs = lies. His rules, his logic, his embarassment. Mere "details," Brian. Those are all "in his wallet" and "he doesn't have to show them" to anybody. :-) Dates...times...places...callsigns.... Yes! Authentic documentation with dates, times, places and names. Got any? He no got. Then he one sorry sack of excrement. Stinking to high heaven. Not in Stebieland. He be perfumed there. :-) You know...those little things called "facts"...(I know that's a new concept for you...deal with it though...) Exactly!!! Facts. Got any? No proof. Zero. Zip. Nada. That's a problem. That's a huge problem, ...an insurmountable problem. Just what does he think we'll accept without authentic documentation??? His "word!" insert several lines of hyena laffing in here :-) Jim served in "other" ways. You and Lennie brag about having been Veterans, however you seem to have a problem with understanding exactly what being a veteran is and what it stands for. The last five Presidents of the United States seem to have had a clear vision of volunteerism...and also about "service". In all of Title 47 C.F.R., the term "service" is a regulatory one denoting the type and kind of radio activity being regulated. Stebie doesn't understand that. He thinks that the amateur service is some kind of "national service" or "service to the country." :-) In that case, the Citizens Band Radio SERVICE will have all radio amateurs outnumbered by a large ratio. :-) He's talking about the guys driving 1982 Subaru station wagons with "save da mediteranean fruit fly" and rainbow bumper stickers. I think that Stebie's fanciful imagination was working overtime when he got to the "presidential service" bit! :-) Since FDR's time, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Carter, Reagan, Nixon, Ford, and G.H.W. Bush *ALL* served in the U.S. military but long before Stebie's alleged USMC "career." That's NINE U.S. Presidents. I don't think any one of them had an amateur radio license! Clinton did NOT serve IN the U.S. military and Dubya never got beyond the Air Guard. I don't think either one of them had an amateur radio license. But Stebie gots an Extra AMATEUR license so he is "comparable" in "service" to at least NINE U.S. Presidents!!! Geezus H. Cottonpicker, Stebie done stretched things out so FAR that his comparison rubber BROKE. Stebie has SNAPPED. This Memorial Day I'll do what I think on HONORING the veterans of the United States military. You have and I have. I will mention Cpl Elmer Hardy and Capt Jim Tomlinson, both gone suddenly on the 1st of July, 1950, both members of *MY* Signal Battalion (the one I served in). I will HONOR them and the other 18 members of MY Battalion who lost their lives in the same crash in Korea...sent there from the "rear-area" of Japan by Gen MacArthur to improve communications after the North Koreans invaded South Korea. Stebie is going to say I "dishonor" them by mentioning them. He has stated that before and that is just as damnably FALSE as anything he has ever babbled. Normally I would have told Stebie ("Mr. Seven Hostile Actions") to Go To Hell. He is already there. Scroom. Indeed. Jim could have volunteered to serve in the Unites States Military. He had other more important things to do like pursue a degree in engineering, and looking out for himself. And the military still needs engineers, even if they are civilians. Go to WWW.USAJOBS.OPM.GOV and select "Middle East." Doesn't matter. Jimmie Noserve is an EXPERT on the military. He KNOWS how military men feel/act/etc. Jimmie can "correct" any veterans' "mistakes." He's read several books on the subject... Jimmy is Mr. Fiction. "No Experience = Shut-Up" according to da double standard. Jimmie Noserve never worked any REAL radio communications beyond amateur hobby stuff. He never took any Oath on being inducted and never even got to "dine with the Captain" (on an aircraft carrier) and being "served by drudges." He never ever had any worries that anyone on the "other side" would harm his precious being. He could sit back and laff and laff at the "errors" of getting wrong USSR aircraft nomenclature and poke fun at no-coders doing REAL COMMUNICATIONS just a few flying hours away from hostiles. I'm good with volunteerism in the U.S. armed services. Tell Jim to let us know how it's going when he gets there. Now THAT will be INTERESTING! :-) Highly, highly unlikely. Guys like Jim have no problem letting guys like you, me, and Steve take the risks. They set way, way back and make the calls. They are the "elite" and shouldn't risk their precious bodies in any way. We are the "drudges" that Kellie talks about, the lower class, not near as ELITE as the No-Serves. Later on you learn that they gave blood at the ARC Bloodmobile on the third Thursday and are very, very good with it all. They "served" in other ways. Cheers with a little glass of OJ. Hi! I'll follow "Kizzie's salute" and spit in THEIR O.J. Foggem! A respectful salute to you, Brian, as one veteran to another. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Sat,May 21 2005 5:04 pm
wrote: wrote: For years and years the ARRL has emphasized morsemanship over and above all other skills in amateur radio. How, Len? Let's look at some examples... Policy: In 1953, when the FCC opened all amateur operating privileges to all US radio amateurs except Novices and Technicians, ARRL did not try to require more code testing for full privileges. Their very, very last effort at leadership. Fifty two years ago. HALF A FRIGGIN LIFETIME AGO FOR RADIO EXPERIMENTORS!!! Idiot! Jimmie was THERE...in his heart. :-) Gosh and gee-whilikers...in 1953 I was doing HF communications while in the U.S. Army and didn't have to know a thing about morse code. Reason is probably that NONE of the three dozen high power transmitters at one station (only the 3rd largest in the Army network) used any morse code. NONE of the personnel at that station were required to know morse code to operate all those transmitters (minimum 1 KW RF out, maximum 15 KW but later increased to 40 KW). HF bands, 24/7 operations, nearly a quarter million messages handled each month. In 1963, in its original "incentive licensing" proposal to FCC, ARRL proposed that full privileges be available only to Advanced and Extra licensees, and that the Advanced be reopened to new issues. This meant that full priviliges would require more written testing but not more code testing. I advocate that full privs be established for 90WPM tested amateurs. Got any??? Privs for those not able to achieve 90WPM will be reassigned to the BPL bands. Idiot! As Jimmie Noserve likes to put it, "that's simply 'untrue'." :-) Brian, you have to understand that Jimmie is the Compleat (amateur) Manchurian Candidate. Fully brainwashed into thinking that the ARRL is the holy grail of "truth" and all good works. In 1990, ARRL supported the creation of a nocodetest amateur radio license. Why not 1987??? Idiot! Where was the ARRL's leadership when the FCC made the "Novice Enhancement?" Why did the FCC have to go it alone without the ARRL's """Leadership???""" Extra-wipe! Idiot! Jimmie is WRONG BY OMISSION. According to all the documents PRIOR to the final decision on FCC 90-53, the ARRL was AGAINST that. The ARRL only supported the final R&O on the creation of the no-code-test Technician class AFTER THE FACT. Jimmie just can't bring himself to admit that many OTHER parties were trying to cancel the code test PRIOR to 1990. Some time spent in the FCC Reading Room of the correspondence PRIOR to 1990 will show enough support for No-Code-Test that the FCC was lobbied into the 90-53 issuance. Once the NO-CODE-TEST Technician class was established, the ARRL had no other choice to "support" it...it would have been politically destructive to the League to oppose it AFTER THE FACT. Jimmie wants to OMIT certain details to show that the ARRL is in the "leadership." It isn't. The ARRL still hasn't gotten a membership larger than a quarter of all licensed U.S. radio amateurs. The FASTEST GROWING CLASS in U.S. amateur radio - since 1991 - is that very same NO-CODE-TEST Technician class. NO OTHER class has grown so large, so quickly, in the history of amateur radio as regulated by the FCC since 1934. Jimmie is going to trot out his outworn cliches' and other statements (nearly all sinning by omission of details) and state "that is simply wrong." :-) He can't think for himself anymore in amateur radio matters, apparently. He is one of the number-one bunting putter-upper and flag waver for the League. The ARRL can do NO wrong in his eyes. N2EY is so full of EXTRA excrement that I just can't allow the rest of his original post to be quoted. You offend thinking people unlike any "off color" callsign that you would care to strike. In my view, Jimmie is so brainwashed that he can't help himself. He, like Stebie da Avenging Angle of Dearth, is into such a fantasy that Jimmie really thinks what he writes is "truth" and anything contrary is "untrue." Jimmie just can't conceive of his words being in error, therefore he speaks "truth." As to the "off-color callsign" (Kim's vanity call), that's just his personal morality thing. It's almost like he took Vows and was ordained a Priest in the Holy Orders of the Church of St. Hiram...of the Latter-Day Radio Saints? Or was it Former-Day Radio Saints? Must be that for his wanting to cite all those "leadership" actions happening during and before he was born. Another amateur "role-model" to emulate on seeking the "highest goals" in amateur radio...complete Nirvana in morsemanship. Ho hum. |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Sun,May 22 2005 8:29 am
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: wrote: Doesn't matter. Jimmie Noserve is an EXPERT on the military. He KNOWS how military men feel/act/etc. Jimmie can "correct" any veterans' "mistakes." He's read several books on the subject... Jimmy is Mr. Fiction. "No Experience = Shut-Up" according to da double standard. So far, nothing Jim has stated has been incorrect. Hi! Silly Gunny has his blinders on. Well I sort of thought those blinder improved Stebie's looks...kind of softened the fierce scowl he always shows in pictures. [I do wish he would have a dentist work over his teeth so he could smile in those photos...] Jim constantly makes statements on things which he has no experience in. Jim constantly tells others to be silent on things which they have little or no experience in. That is a clear double-standard. That you won't see it is telling. Tsk. Jimmie has played with some surplus military radios and suddenly becomes "expert" enough to "correct" others who have worked with them...like AN/PRC-104s and AN/PRC-119s. Jimmie made a bunch of "guru observations" of the aerospace business a year or so ago, yet he's not told of which companies those were...or the government branch where he was employed as a "space expert." Jimmie claims to be a "radio manufacturer" (!) yet there is no record of such a business in the business journals. He DID show pictures of a klugy vacuum tube transmitter that was supposed to be "state of the art"...and built in the 1990s. He's corrected you AND Lennie on numerous military issues, communications and otherwise, and has yet to be shown to be wrong. I recall you being corrected on military and MARS communications issues. Often. Tsk. Again, it's a point-of-view. To Stebie he NEVER makes mistakes. [he won't admit to such at any rate...] Everyone ELSE LIES if they disagree with heroic Stebie. Highly, highly unlikely. Guys like Jim have no problem letting guys like you, me, and Steve take the risks. They set way, way back and make the calls. Don't try to lump yourself in with me, Brain. Most of my time in the USMC was crewing the MC version of the Pave Low (CH53A and D), a lot of which got me put in places I was not real happy to be in. The Reluctant Marine! Figures. Even reluctant people serve. So how did Jim serve in other way? Tsk. Stebie was GROUND crew. Tsk, tsk, Stebie "wasn't real happy to be..." Poor baby. Wow, "Pave Low!" Stebie sounds like he was reading old Aviation Week & Space Technology magazines that are in the CAP orderly room? :-) HELICOPTER. Wings rotate. You and Lennie got to play rear area office clerk for most of your tours. I give you some added credit for your Somalia tour, your misrepresentation of your Amateur Radio exploits notwithstanding, but not by much. You don't "give" me anything. My service is not up for your approval. Nor mine. I went where I was assigned. Anyone can see where at: http://kauko.hallikainen.org/history/equipment Jimmie Noserve never understood that a while ago. He thought anyone could go on up to the "front lines" and "fight" whenever they wanted to. [he must see a lot of movies...] Later on you learn that they gave blood at the ARC Bloodmobile on the third Thursday and are very, very good with it all. They "served" in other ways. Cheers with a little glass of OJ. I lucked out. The only "injury" I suffered in the field was some sand that got in under my visor and flight glasses and irritated the be-jeebers out of me. So how did you malinger your way into a medical discharge requiring rehabilitative therapy? Tsk, tsk, tsk. Stebie SLIPPED UP in his story generation! This casts a great lot of DOUBT on his "medical discharge" claims! Of course, "medical discharge" can also be for PSYCHIATRIC reasons. Some of my colleagues weren't so lucky. That bloodmobile donation you just made fun of was their ticket home alive instead of in a bag. "Colleagues?!?" GROUND crew wre exposed to "hostile fire?" People everywhere are lucky because others give blood and organ tissue. True enough. But Jim says he "served in other ways." What ways? I'm wondering the same thing...but will never get Jimmie to tell what it is. shrug |
#27
|
|||
|
|||
From: "bb" on Sun,May 22 2005 8:13 am
K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: bb wrote: K4YZ wrote: The last five Presidents of the United States seem to have had a clear vision of volunteerism...and also about "service". Indeed. Jim could have volunteered to serve in the Unites States Military. He had other more important things to do like pursue a degree in engineering, and looking out for himself. And the military still needs engineers, even if they are civilians. Go to WWW.USAJOBS.OPM.GOV and select "Middle East." Guess they shudda consulted with you two first, eh...?!?! I'm good with volunteerism in the U.S. armed services. No, you're not I must be. I volunteered. I kept volunteering. No...you keep "volunteering" to collect a paycheck. Hi! I suppose you wrote "VOID" across your paychecks and sent them back? He probably sent them all to the ARRL Truss Fund. :-) I wonder if Stebie has bothered to study recent USA history? He left out FOUR Presidents who served in the military since FDR...and I'm not counting Dubya. You quite obviously have a problem with the society that the Constitution you alleged to support and defend provides. How so? Somebody ought to break the news to Stebie, might as well be me... STEBIE, NOW HEAR THIS... NO CITIZEN OF THE UNITED STATES ACKNOWLEDGES YOU AS EMPEROR, LEADER, PLENTY-POTENT-ATE, OR EVEN "ANCOIC" OF ANYONE ELSE. CLIK Poor fella thinks the Constitution of the USA has some kind of paragraph saying "everyone has to abide by this wanna-be Dill Sergeant (with the pursed, pickled lips and sour disposition). Tell Jim to let us know how it's going when he gets there. You swore to uphold and defend the Constitution of the United States. Against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Yep. However there's no "enemies" of the Constitution here... So why are you bringing up the defense of the Constitution here? Sorry, Brian, Stebie IS the Constitution! Hi, hi! You really ought to get your stuff in one sock before starting off on a new rant tangent. Looks like an internal battle among his personalities...one shouted out of turn... Obviously you have a problem, however, with people who live their lives within that same Constitution. Explain. No explanation is necessary. Your on-going support of Lennie's cowardly "Jimmie Noserve"'s rants is evidence enough. You're Quitevague about your newest accusations. Please be more specific. Tsk. Stebie IS the Constitution! :-) Saying anything against Stebie is Sedition, Treason Against The State!!! Hey, while you're at it, why don't you produce authentic documentation of your alleged "A" NCOIC MARS/Okinawa. Right after we get some of the information we've been asking YOU for for YEARS... So then, you really are a liar. You're the very thing you claim of everyone else. Ah, not quite from Stebie's point of view. In his distorted view Stebie is "always truthful" but everyone who doesn't like him is a "LIAR," "deceitful," "hates ham radio," and/or has underarm odor. So...was your Oath as a member of the Armed Forces just some words you recited in order to get a federal job? Sure looks that way. I'm offended that Jim claimed "service in other ways." What other ways? Why would you expect Jim to answer such an insulting question when YOU have overtly refused to answer questions he's put to you for YEARS, Brain? Why wouldn't he? He has no problem insulting others. Tsk, now Jimmie Noserve is going to be furious! Jimmie "NEVER" "insults" anyone...all he does is "point out mistakes" that "others do." :-) (Rhetorical question...we know the answer...you're a coward...) Hi, hi! That's rich coming from the guy who couldn't make Dayton to see me. Seven hostile actions? Hi! Tsk. Readers are still unaware of Stebie's mighty warrior acts WHEN and WHERE of those "seven hostile actions!" Maybe they were "special ops" and veddy, veddy "secret" that Stebie can't reveal? :-) [gosh, maybe we can hear one of his "HALO Drop" stories?] So is Jim checking out the governments needs over in the desert? He would be drawing a nice, tax-free paycheck. Jimmie is "serving in other ways" by defending the Constitution of the ARRL...against all enemies, especially the domestic no-coders. Plus he is probably training for another marathon, another "service for his country." Hi, hi! That and keeping his Time Machine running so he can jump back to times when Kode was King in raddio. "Important national service," you bet! :-) insert eight lines of all-caps hyena laghter here |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
From: "K4YZ" on Sun,May 22 2005 2:53 am
bb wrote: wrote: Don't try to lump yourself in with me, Brain. Most of my time in the USMC was crewing the MC version of the Pave Low (CH53A and D), a lot of which got me put in places I was not real happy to be in. Whoa, there, "SEA STALLION." The CH-53A to CH-53D are called "Sea Stallion," NOT "Pave Low." CH-53E is called "Super Sea Stallion." The "Pave Low" is the MH-53E through O suffix, operated mostly by the USAF. More specifially "Pave Low II" to "Pave Low VI." The "CH" in the type designation stands for Cargo, Helicopter. The CH-53A through CH-53D are CARGO HAULERS. Some of the MH-53s are into special ops. But, the Sea Stallion is basically a CARGO HAULER, first operational in 1966. Took only a few minutes on the Internet to check that out. Now, heroic "seven hostile actions" veteran, what exactly ARE you trying to foist over on everyone with a CARGO HAULER, and whatinhell does that have to do with AMATEUR RADIO?!?!? As usual, the "seven hotile actions" hero is running another reputation SCAM on everyone. Significant OMISSIONS of information along with an outright LIE on aircraft names versus type number. If you are going to LIE, BLUFF, SCAM, try to get your military nomenclature CORRECT. You did NOT do so! Stand down. That is all. Dismissed. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hans Goes The Mile To Make A Point...But Doesn't Give ALL The Facts... | Policy | |||
Robeson Out-Manufactures Chrysler Corp. | General | |||
K0HB, Lennie of the North, Returns To RRAP And Comes Out Slinging! | Policy | |||
Robeson and his Sycophants | Policy | |||
Why Is Steve Robeson Intentionally Mistruthful and Deceitful? | Policy |