John Barnard wrote:

J. D. B. wrote:
Sorry John, do some reading for once as that is the reality of the
Canadian system. You'll actually learn something if you do research
yourself and not just listen to NPR and CNN.

Now, on the other hand, if you live in the U.K., you'll still have
healthcare through the end of the year, but if you are too old, they
just let you die as it is not worth the expenditure to keep someone
old alive even longer. But again, hey, your estate gets to keep the
money!

Come on, this isn't really John now is it? Hillary Clinton, is that
you?

John Barnard wrote:

You are one delusional mofo! Lay off the Bush sauce and you'll be
able to handle reality.

JB


Here are your words:

If you get sick late in the year, and the healthcare
facility/hospital shut down for the rest of the year because it ran
out of government money (a typical scenario in Canada), there will be
no one to give you any care and you'll just die.

Pray tell, oh wise one, from what source are you getting this
information? You claim that this is a typical scenario in Canada, which
is utter BS (= Bush ****), which means that it happens all the time. It
seems rather strange that none of this seems to make the headlines or news.

Maybe they just don't want you to know the truth? Not surprising, since the
government in CanaDuh woud fall if you ever discovered the truth.

BTW, I overheard this while I was visiting in Toronto and witnessed an
accident: " Wow! The police and ambulance are much quicker here than in
Atlanta".

Did the accident involve the police and the ambulance racing to the donut shop?
Maybe that's why they appeared to be quicker.

dxAce
Michigan
USA