Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Fifth pillar
"Mark Kramer" wrote in message ... I wasn't talking about a place where there are only one or two repeaters. I was talking about a place where there are a large number of repeaters, but only one or two have a lot of activity. If you want to got through and shut down the "inactive" repeaters so you can harvest the assigned pairs, then you will wind up with not enough infrastructure when it is really needed. The notion I advanced wasn't an arbitrary and heavy-handed "mass extinction", but a deliberate cooperative "needs assessment" process. Here is what I suggested: Since this thread is about the "5th Pillar" of ARRL emphasis, "technology", perhaps ARRL and NFCC could jointly sponsor a Skimmer-like technology initiative which would put up a broadband receiver on a local highrise (we're in flatland country out here) and count squelch-tails per QRG for three months. Then approach the low 10% and suggest they might reconsider their needs. Especially those clubs who sponsor multiple quiet repeaters all covering an identical footprint. An obvious part of that needs assessment process would be to identify (and protect) critical infrastructure. The desired end result (not well stated, perhaps), would be a small pool of QRGs set aside as an "emerging technology corridor" (DStar mentioned only as an example) where tinkering and experimentation were encouraged. Mike suggests that there would be very few users of such a "technology reservation". That's almost certainly true, but I don't think that makes it a "bad thing". It's no secret that homebrewing and "radio for the sake of advancing the art of radio" (in Mikes terms "technology for it's own sake") is a minority share of our hobby. But I think that it's an important minority, critical to our future, and that we can afford to set aside "incubation spectrum" to nurture it. 73, de Hans, K0HB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|