Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#15
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 1, 5:31�pm, "Stefan Wolfe" wrote:
wrote in message ps.com... From: "Stefan Wolfe" on Wed, Feb 28 2007 7:24 pm * I agree but Steven James Robeson, K4YZ, wrote it. *See the quote * marks up there? * You were not present when Robeson was told of his obvious * error...by several others. *I posted the link to the DoD * directive on MARS operations. In order to join MARS and receive a MARS call sign, one must be approved by a branch of the military service for that purpose and one must be a present, retired or family member of a military member. * You had best look up the various service branch MARS * web pages and correct yourself on the above. You are correct but this is a very insignificant point. NOT to the military nor the particular MARS group. As if everyone here has read all of your posts over the last 10 years? I see you like to flatter yourself. No. No flattery is necessary. Brian Burke, Hans Brakob and myself tried to correct Robesin but - as usual - he refused to be corrected. That particular thread ran for months. That quote was VERY familiar to ANYONE seeing it at the time. Really. OMG, I thought MARS was a Top SECRET classified confidential and highly tactical/strategic radio service that was used on different frequencies than the ham bands so we couldn't hear what the military was saying. Did the Russians know about this too? You are writing gibberish again. MARS did not carry any classified or secure communications nor was it "secret" to any amateur years ago. I doubt ANY MARS station ever carried classified communications. In 1954, for example, the Tokyo MARS station was a two- room office space at the FEC Hq building (the former Japanese military Hq building during WW2, would later revert back as the Japanese Self Defense Force Hq when FEC Hq was moved to Fort Shafter, HI. MARS got to use bits and pieces of RF transmitters on a very low priority - if and only if it was available. I know this as a member of the REAL tactical-strategic Army station that served the FEC Hq at the time. In late 1955 the Tokyo MARS station got moved to Hardy Barracks in west-central Tokyo and was permitted to get multi- band beam antenna and more amateur-like equipment. The predecessor to MARS * was born before WW2 in the US Army, a quaint idea to get US * amateurs involved in hopes that some "new technology" in radio * might be tried out or shown to the US Army. *As far as radio * design for the Army is concerned, that did not appear to happen. It only served to put a few service people in touch with their loved ones during WW2, korea and VN. NOT "during" WW2. NOT "during" the active part of the Korean War. The Korean War entered a permanent Truce period in July 1953 and that has NOT ended to this day. In 1954 and beyond, there were sufficient voice telephone circuits available commercially to enable "loved ones" to communicate directly with military personnel...IF and only IF those personnel were free to use such commercial communications. Officers and other higher-rank civilians were able to do so but not the vast majority of the rest. Red Cross messaging was available (on a low priority to military comms) and usually sent over non-busy TTY circuits after the end of a "radio day" (which was about 2 to 3 AM local Tokyo time). This was seen at ADA Control center where I spent a month filling in for a regular center E-5 who was on emergency leave. During that time one of the TTY relay tape handlers on midnight shift got to see a copy of a Red Cross message saying he had just become a father. Proud new papa was then chewed out by the Officer in Charge of TTY relay for "looking at unauthorized messages!" That OIC was later reprimanded by the signal battalion commander for that...and wound up on the immediate list for return to civilian life as a reservist, something that was the Army's equivalent to "downsizing" after the Truce. MARS *is* given credit for its messaging during the Vietnam War morale support. You can find that at the US Army Center for Military History on Signal Operations during the Vietnam War. The DoD dates the 'Nam War from 1965 to 1973 and is over 30 years in the past. Then this "new technology" as you put it was all forgotten due to the other big secret that I think you're holding back on: Roswell. And the +/- gravity amplifiers. After the saucer crashes, the military considered ham radio to be relatively low tech so MARS was relegated to a low place on the military budget, but I know you must deny this :-)) You are nuts. Well, I might suggest you avoid the "f" word when posting. Remember, whatever you post here is and always will be accessible to everyone who cares to research you on usenet. Do you have grandchildren? No. My grand-nephew is presently serving in Iraq as a PFC with a heavy-equipment moving and repair unit. I am proud of his voluntary service and know damn-****ing-well how he and his buddies "talk" as one who went before him. Authoring posts like this with the "f" word will show them how little class their ancestor had. Ever think of that, bud? You've been taking lessons from the Nun of the Above? Drop the ANONYMOUS Sister act with knuckle-spanking ruler. One transgendered sissy in here is enough. Two is way too many. However, I think we all can agree it will be 20K times worse for offshoots of kb9rqz (I feel sorry for them already!). No, that's WRONG. Given the posting examples of one who managed to get the callsign of K4YZ (there are no psychological tests of radio amateurs), HIS progeny are probably carrying his gene material. That is NOT GOOD for the human race. Or for the USMC. Steppinwolfe, why go on with your ANONYMITY? You don't fool anyone. You are simply ignorant of radio communications in general, certainly so for the USA which has a lot of communications history available for the learning. Get some help with your "belief" in aliens and flying saucers. Or go infiltrate "Area 51" and get arrested for trespassing on US military property...you will then get some "help" on your crazy belief trauma. LA |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! | Policy | |||
HAMS ACCUSE OMEGA ONE OF PIRACY! | General | |||
Part # 2 - The Simplest Shortwave Listener (SWL) Antennas That I Know Of . . . | Shortwave | |||
802.11x and part 97 | Digital | |||
802.11x and part 97 | Digital |