Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 7, 7:04?pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/Appl...ain.jsp?applID... Congrats on the new license, Lennie. Congratulations to Len also. Dee, N8UZE Thank you, Dee. Now, what were you saying about the "ARRL VEC handling 'new' applications 'first?'" I know the package of paperwork from the Sunday exam session (25th) was sent off quickly. ...back to business as usual in here. Len I can say with certainty that I mailed my Feb 23rd materials on Saturday the 24th and all my applicants, both new licensees and upgraders showed in the FCC database on Feb 27. Since I used priority mail, it was almost certainly in the ARRL's hands on Monday, Feb 24. Perhaps I was lucky enough to beat the big surge of submittals and to be on top. Dee, N8UZE |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 7, 8:30�pm, "Dee Flint" wrote:
wrote in message oups.com... On Mar 7, 7:04?pm, "Dee Flint" wrote: "KH6HZ" wrote in message ... http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/Appl...ain.jsp?applID.... Congrats on the new license, Lennie. Congratulations to Len also. Dee, N8UZE * Thank you, Dee. * Now, what were you saying about the "ARRL VEC handling * 'new' applications 'first?'" *I know the package of paperwork * from the Sunday exam session (25th) was sent off quickly. * ...back to business as usual in here. * Len I can say with certainty that I mailed my Feb 23rd materials on Saturday the 24th and all my applicants, both new licensees and upgraders showed in the FCC database on Feb 27. Since I used priority mail, it was almost certainly in the ARRL's hands on Monday, Feb 24. *Perhaps I was lucky enough to beat the big surge of submittals and to be on top. Okay on paying attention to your group. I'm just doubtiing that the ARRL VEC had the Big Deluge of mail that claimed (but did not quantify) on their website. That's one reason I did the tabulation from the FCC Search engine results that started this thread. Part of a "deluge" might have been from too many ARRL/VEC teams adding extra exams on Friday or Saturday, out of the usual monthly schedules (give or take). I can understand those with CSCEs wanting to upgrade (although I don't know why 4 in my exam session thought they needed that to "modify" their Tech license to a Tech license under the new rules). :-( There were about 2 who just needed to change their mailing address, something which could have been done by mail or by computer directly...no charge. Judging by all the modifications (not an upgrade) and the renewals handled by the ARRL, those could have been done OUTSIDE the need for hand-holding the free paperwork process on relatively small tasks. I'm thinking more of the usual "celebrity PR ploy" of the ARRL "becoming overworked." Not unusual PR tactic. That kind of PR is done in this city all the time in the entertainment biz here. 73, AF6AY |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Radio Revolution, the DRM way | Shortwave | |||
Revolution in Ukraine? | Shortwave | |||
The Revolution Will Not be Televised | Shortwave | |||
The Revolution Isn't Being Radioized | Shortwave | |||
Revolution in Haiti? | Shortwave |