Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article , Dwight Stewart
writes: And conservatives want to end big government. More specifically, conservatives want to end unnecessary government rules which exist only to benefit the interests of a certain special interest group. While you and your ilk (a special interest group) have an interest in maintaining code testing to reinforce your self-perceived status, code testing itself is unnecessary today for anything outside that. Therefore, those seeking to end code testing are more compatible with conservative views, while those seeking to maintain code testing to reinforce status are more compatible with liberal views. Dwight: You've conveniently failed to take into account the full context of my previous response on the same topic. I'm not an anarchist, Dwight. I believe that government has a role in our society, and maintaining standards in the ARS, an activity in which citizens are given the privilege of making use of the valuable and finite resource known as the RF spectrum, makes sense to me. Well, that's big of you. The question now is which standards (necessary or unnecessary), which you answer in the next few sentences. The "government protection" whine is just another NCTA strawman. I prefer to think of it as the government "protecting" the whole ARS, not just the Morse code and it's testing requirement. (snip) Then you support unnecessary government requirements. No, I don't. However, I don't consider the code testing requirement to be "unnecessary." I consider this requirement to be current, valid, and essential to maintaining the use of this valuable communications skill within the ARS. Code testing serves no real purpose today, Prove it… either as a means of insuring communications support to those outside Ham Radio …starting with this… or as a means to keep riff-raft out of Ham Radio (you were able to get in). Where have I ever said that it has this effect? I have repeatedly disclaimed this particular theory, usually citing the 20-WPM Extra- class HF Phone reprobates who collect virtually 100% of the NAL's issued to amateur radio operators. As such, it exists solely to maintain your own delusions of status and I don't think the government should be maintaining rules just so you can help yourself feel important. No, Dwight, that's just your own twisted and, quite frankly, slanderous opinion. (snip) "Rednecks," of any region, are usually tough, self-reliant, moral and decent people. (snip) You fail that test in many ways. A redneck doesn't need government rules to be "self-reliant" and your attitudes towards others are certainly not "decent" or "moral." If that's how you perceive me, then you're obviously no judge of character. And, based on your old web page pictures, you clearly don't look that tough. And just what is that supposed to mean? It looks like you're making the classic mistake of judging a book by it's cover. So, failing that test, we have to look elsewhere for someone similar to you. And, looking solely at attitudes towards others, only the deep woods redneck springs to mind. Well, I guess you're entitled to your opinion, groundless though it may be. These people (deep woods rednecks) don't like anybody outside kin or clan, and just barely, though not always, tolerate neighbors. I haven't had any complaints. Does this sound familiar, Larry? I don't know what you do with your kin, so I won't go there. However, speaking solely of Ham Radio, you don't like anyone outside your pro-code testing clan, and just barely, though not always, tolerate those outside the code testing debate. Dwight, you're digging yourself into a deep hole of scurrilous, groundless ad hominem attacks -- something that I've been accused of in the past. Of course, this is only a perception. And, I might add, not a very well-considered one at that. Since you obviously have a different perception of yourself, we're never going to agree. As such, I'll drop the comparative speculation at this point. That's the most intelligent thing you've said so far in this entire post. You've obviously had a bad day, so I'll let it go at that. 73 de Larry, K3LT |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1366  October 17 2003 | General | |||
Some comments on the NCVEC petition | Policy | |||
NCVEC NPRM for elimination of horse and buggy morse code requirement. | Policy | |||
Now That It's "Over"... | Policy | |||
ATTN: Tech Licensee USA Morse Code Freedom Day is August 1st | Policy |